NZMA Home

Table of contents
Current issue
Search journal
Archived issues
NZMJ Obituaries
Classifieds
Hotline (free ads)
How to subscribe
How to contribute
How to advertise
Contact Us
Copyright
Other journals
The New Zealand Medical Journal

 Journal of the New Zealand Medical Association, 26-July-2002, Vol 115 No 1158

Outpatient treatment of community acquired venous thromboembolism - the Christchurch experience
David Heaton, Dug Yeo Han and Alison Inder
Abstract
Aims To describe our experience with the outpatient treatment of venous thromboembolic disease at Christchurch Hospital in the first 30 months following the establishment of an outpatient haemostasis service in March 1999.
Methods Patient clinical and laboratory data were collected prospectively on a Microsoft Access database and statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel software.
Results 288 patients were treated and their medical profiles are detailed. The treatment protocols for low molecular weight heparin and warfarin, using dosing protocols determined by weight and INR results, are described. During the course of heparin therapy no patient had clinical progression of thrombosis and only one had haemorrhage.
Conclusions Treatment of DVT delivered to outpatients has proven to be effective and safe.

Heparin therapy, followed by oral anticoagulation has been routine treatment for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) for many years. Usually standard unfractionated heparin was administered by intravenous infusion and monitored by activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) testing. This required the patient to be in hospital until oral anticoagulation became established. More recently, low molecular weight heparin has been available and given subcutaneously, on a weight-determined dose without monitoring, results in predictable anticoagulation. This is at least as safe and effective as unfractionated heparin in the treatment of DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE) 1,2. Trials have also shown that such treatment can be given safely out of hospital3, 4. Outpatient anticoagulation for initial treatment of DVT and related disorders began at Christchurch Hospital in March 1999. This report details our experience of treating patients over the following 30 months and includes a report on the use of an oral anticoagulation dosage protocol.

Methods

The Haemostasis Service at Christchurch Hospital was established to provide outpatient care for adults with bleeding and clotting disorders, principally those with haemophilia or venous thrombosis. It consists of a haemostasis nurse (full time) and a haemostasis physician/haematologist (part time). Most patients with DVT were seen initially in the Emergency Department, diagnosed by ultrasound, and then assessed by the Internal Medicine Acute Team. If they had no other significant illness requiring admission they were referred to the Haemostasis service for further management. Patients arriving during normal working hours were often referred immediately. Those arriving out of hours received an initial dose of low molecular weight heparin and were referred to the clinic the following morning. Some patients with extensive superficial thrombophlebitis or with non-massive PE were also referred to the clinic.

Table 1. Dosing schedule for dalteparin and warfarin.
DALTEPARIN DOSAGE
WEIGHT (kg)
DOSE (u/day)
DOSE/KG
44-55
10,000
227-182
56-67
12,500
223-186
68-80
15,000
220-187
81-99
18,000
222-182
100-110
20,000
200-181
WARFARIN DOSAGE


DOSE (mg/day)
DAY 1
WEIGHT ≥ 60 kg
INR ≤ 1.2

15 mg

WEIGHT < 60 kg
INR ≤ 1.2

10mg

INR > 1.2
Treat empirically
DAY 2
INR ≤ 1.5
INR > 1.5
5mg
0mg
DAY 3
INR < 1.5
INR 1.5-1.9
INR 2.0-2.5
INR 2.6-3.0
INR > 3.0
10mg
5mg
4mg
3mg
0mg
DAY 4
INR < 1.5
INR 1.5-1.9
INR 2.0-2.5
INR 2.6-3.0
INR > 3.0
10mg
8mg
5mg
3mg
0mg
DAY 5
INR < 2.0
INR 2.0-2.2
INR 2.3-2.4
INR 2.5-2.6
INR 2.7-3.0
INR > 3.0
10mg
8mg
6mg
4mg
2mg
0mg

The patients were seen daily by the haemostasis nurse and at least once by the haemostasis physician. They received daily subcutaneous injections of dalteparin (Fragmin) on a weight-based schedule (Table 1) with a maximum dose of 20000iu. Warfarin therapy was commenced the same day as the heparin or the following day and was administered according to a nomogram (Table 1) modified from one devised by Fennerty and colleagues.5 The Fennerty protocol was modified (a) to have a weight-determined dose on day 1, (b) to have a lower dose day 2, (c) to have a zero dose if INR >3 and (d) to have fewer steps. Patients who had commenced warfarin off protocol prior to referral or whose initial INR was elevated were dosed empirically. Patients with superficial thrombophlebitis were treated with therapeutic doses of dalteparin for two weeks without the addition of warfarin.
Patient history and examination were recorded on a standard form and the following tests were routinely performed: prothrombin time (PT), APTT, blood count, ESR, creatinine, liver function tests, D-dimers (SimpliRED screening test or IL D-dimer assay), thrombophilia screen (antithrombin, protein S, protein C, activated protein C (APC) resistance, plasminogen, lupus anticoagulant–genetic tests for Factor V Leiden and the G20210A prothrombin mutation were performed if the APC resistance test was positive), chest X-ray and ECG. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) was performed in males aged over 40 years and pelvic ultrasound in females.
The patients were monitored daily with clinical assessment of legs and pulse oximetry. Low molecular weight heparin was given for at least five days and until the INR was ≥2.0 on two consecutive days. Blood was taken for INR testing, warfarin tablets were provided and the patient was phoned later that day with warfarin dose advice. The patients were discharged to their general practitioner once oral anticoagulation was stable with a recommendation for the duration of therapy and DVT patients were offered a review at the clinic in one year’s time. Those who attended that clinic were assessed for history of clinical recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and for development of the post-phlebitic syndrome. The patient data were collected in the hospital notes and on a Microsoft Access database and statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel software.

Results

Prior to starting the DVT outpatient service in March 1999, about 100 patients were admitted annually to the Christchurch hospital for treatment of community acquired DVT. In the first two and a half years of the outpatient service, we treated 228 patients with VTE. During that same period another 49 patients were admitted for inpatient care and 24 of those were in the first four months showing that the majority of patients were managed by the outpatient service.
Table 2. Age/sex of patients and site of thrombi.
Male
124

Female
104

Age (male)
21-80
53.1 (mean)
Age (female)
16-90
54.5 (mean)
Upper limb DVT
10

Upper limb Superficial VT
5

Lower limb DVT
173

Iliac

9
Femoral

79
Popliteal

60
Calf

25
Lower limb Superficial VT
12

Pulmonary embolism
28


There were 228 patients (124 male, 104 female) aged 16 to 90 years with a mean of 53.8 years (Table 2) who were treated by the outpatient Haemostasis Service during this period. The primary diagnoses were lower limb DVT (173) (right 70, left 103), upper limb DVT (10), superficial vein thrombosis (17) and pulmonary embolism (28). 60 patients had suffered a prior venous thrombosis.

Table 3. Risk factors for thrombosis.
CLINICAL RISK FACTORS
N
% of patients
Previous venous thrombosis
60
26.3
Family history of VTE
42
18.4
Travel >4 hrs within last 4 weeks
34
14.9
Recent surgery
34
14.9
Active malignancy ( 6 months)
22
9.6
Immobility
20
8.8
Leg trauma
16
7.0
Oral contraceptive use
15
6.6
Hormone replacement Rx
8
3.5
IV central line
8
3.5
THROMBOPHILIA

% of patients tested
Factor V Leiden (hetero)
36
18.3
Protein S deficiency
11
5.6
Lupus anticoagulant
4
2.0
Protein C deficiency
3
1.5
Antithrombin deficiency
2
1.0
Prothrombin mutation (hetero)
1
2.8


128 patients had one clinical risk factor, 57 had two, five had three or more and 38 had no recognisable clinical risk factor (Table 3). Of the 34 patients with recent surgery, 20 had orthopaedic procedures. 22 patients had active cancer, or cancer diagnosed or treated within the last six months. No new cancers were diagnosed at presentation. Thrombophilia tests were performed in 197 patients and the results appear in Table 3.

Table 4. D-dimer result and site of thrombus.
SITE OF THROMBUS
Positive
Negative
Not tested
Upper limb DVT
5
0
5
Upper limb Superficial VT
2
1
2
Lower limb DVT



Iliac
7
0
2
Femoral
49
5
25
Popliteal
34
12
14
Calf
11
4
10
Lower limb Superficial VT
9
0
3
Pulmonary embolism
20
2
6

At the beginning of this 30 month period, D-dimers were assessed as either positive or negative by the SimpliRED test and more recently quantified by IL D-dimer assay (>250mg/L considered elevated/positive). 161 of the patients were tested for D-dimers before receiving any heparin and only these results were analysed (Table 4). Of those with pulmonary embolism or iliac or femoral DVT, 92% had positive D-dimers whereas only 74% of those with popliteal or calf vein thrombosis had elevated levels. Of the eight upper limb thrombi tested, seven had elevated levels and all nine lower limb superficial vein thrombi tested had elevated levels.
Figure 1. INR results (+/- 1SD) in protocol patients.
CONTENT01.jpg

135 patients followed the warfarin dosing protocol. The mean doses of warfarin were 14.6 (day 1), 4.9 (day 2), 5.5 (day 3), 6.2 (day 4), 6.6 (day 5) and 5.8 (day 6). The mean INRs were 1.0 (day 1), 1.2 (day 2), 1.9 (day 3), 2.1 (day 4), 2.2 (day 5) and 2.4 (day 6) (Figure 1). There were 29 INR results over 3 during the first six days of treatment (3.6% of tests). The mean duration of heparin therapy in this group was 5.8 days.
Patients in different age and weight groups achieved comparable degrees of anticoagulation using our dosing protocol though this was achieved with different doses of warfarin (Table 5).
Table 5. Warfarin dose (mg/day) and INR by age and weight of patient.
GROUP
MEAN AGE (years)
MEAN WEIGHT (Kg)
MEAN WARFARIN DOSE DAY 5
MEAN INR

DAY 5
Age < 70
48
85
6.9
2.2
Age 70+
76
74
4.7
2.5
Wt <60 Kg
56
54
4.7
2.6
Wt 60-79 Kg
51
72
6.1
2.2
Wt 80-99 Kg
52
88
7.1
2.2
Wt 100+ Kg
52
110
7.7
2.1

The relationship was assessed between the mean warfarin dose on days 3-5 (using protocol-determined doses) and the maintenance warfarin dose on day 30 obtained by phone call to the patient’s general practice clinic (Figure 2). There was a positive correlation (R2 = 0.62 p=<0.001) and line of best fit was y=0.969+0.739x.
Figure 2. Correlation of mean warfarin dose days 3-5 with maintenance dose day 30 in protocol patients only.
CONTENT02.jpg
76 patients received empirical warfarin dosing. The mean doses of warfarin were 9.6 (day 1), 6.6 (day 2), 5.6 (day 3), 5.6 (day 4), 6.5 (day 5) and 6.5mg (day 6). The mean INRs were 1.1 (day 1), 1.2 (day 2), 1.9 (day 3), 2.1 (day 4), 2.1 (day 5) and 2.2 (day 6). There were 20 INR results over 3 during the first six days of treatment (4.4% of tests). The mean duration of heparin therapy in this group was 6.5 days. Seventeen patients (including eleven with superficial vein thrombosis) received no warfarin and were treated with heparin only.
No patients suffered clinical pulmonary embolism or extension of DVT during the low molecular weight heparin treatment. Only one patient suffered a haemorrhage during this time. This was a 68 year old woman with an INR of 2.1 on day three who developed epistaxis which persisted despite reversal of anticoagulation and required surgical management.
117 DVT patients were diagnosed more than one year prior to the end of the study period and theoretically were eligible for a one-year clinical review. Only 63 attended. Reasons for non-attendance included: failure to receive booking advice, failure to attend, non-residence in Christchurch and death. Three patients were known to have had a recurrence of DVT within the first year. The Patient Management System (PMS) records of the other 54 patients were accessed to identify if any had been admitted to a public hospital for recurrent VTE but none had. Five patients are known to have died within the year following diagnosis of DVT. All died of cancer at 0.3, 1,1,3 and 9 months following DVT and all but one were known to have cancer when the DVT occurred. Twelve of the 63 patients reviewed at one year had developed mild (none severe) post phlebitic syndrome using the criteria of Prandoni et al.6

Discussion

Christchurch Hospital is the only hospital in the city that accepts acute general medical admissions. During the study period most cases of suspected DVT in the community were sent to this hospital for diagnosis and subsequent treatment.
The prevalence of laboratory and clinical prothrombotic states was as expected (Table3). Height was not routinely recorded in these patients hence obesity was not formally assessed. Although obesity is often considered a risk factor for spontaneous DVT, this has been challenged.7 The most common inherited condition was factor V Leiden, found in 18% of those tested. Further cases of the prothrombin mutation would probably have been detected if more patients had been tested for that genetic mutation. The extent to which thrombophilia testing should be done and how the results should influence patient management remains somewhat controversial.8 Although most of our patients were tested for thrombophilia, the results rarely influenced our management. Based on the reported high recurrence rate in such people,9 the patient with heterozygosity for both factor V Leiden and the prothrombin mutation was advised to take prolonged warfarin therapy but chose not to follow that advice.
Recommended schedules for dalteparin dosing had placed a daily upper limit of 18000u as this had been used in initial clinical trials. As there is evidence that the pharmacokinetics of low molecular weight heparin are not significantly altered in obese subjects,10 we extended this upper limit to 20000u thus allowing a standard weight-based dosing schedule for patients weighing up to 110kg (Table 1).
Traditionally warfarin therapy was started with a loading dose. Most patients using the Fennerty protocol receive 10 mg on both day one and day two and this dose was commonly used in our hospital. As the mean maintenance dose is about 6mg, a “10,10” protocol constitutes a loading dose on both day 1 and day 2 for most people. If a loading dose is to be used, it seems more logical to give that on day 1 only and 15mg was chosen for those >60Kg and 10mg for 60+Kg.11 Because of concern with early over-anticoagulation and low factor VII levels with high initial doses, loading doses are now less frequently used and a starting dose of 5mg is favoured. A study of 53 patients given an initial dose of either 5mg or 10mg demonstrated a similar time to achieving a therapeutic INR in both groups.12 In that study, 4% of INR results in the first six days of treatment were above 3 in the 5mg group compared to 12% in the 10mg group. In our protocol patients, 3.6% of the tests were above 3 in the same time period and in our non-protocol group 4.4% of the tests were above 3. Our patients were not randomly allocated to protocol or non-protocol so no formal comparison can be made between the groups. The results, however, suggest that the use of our protocol, including the use of a loading dose, can accommodate the differing dose requirements associated with varying age and weight (Table 5) without an excess of over anticoagulation.
No analysis of the cost of this service compared to the cost of alternative inpatient care was made for the purposes of this paper. We believe, however, that the economic benefits observed elsewhere would apply.13 A previous paper in this Journal documented some deficiencies in the transfer of warfarinised patients from Christchurch hospital to general practitioner care.14 We expect that the more formalised transfer protocol, accompanied by treatment recommendations, used by our service will improve patient care during and following this transition. Although no formal evaluation of patient satisfaction was performed, the number of spontaneous complimentary statements made about the service impressed us. In particular, the patients were pleased to be out of hospital and few found difficulty with daily transport. The objective results of the first 30 months activity of this clinic confirm that treatment of VTE can be provided effectively and safely in the outpatient setting.
Author Information:; David Heaton, Consultant Haematologist; Dug Yeo Han, Biostatistician; Alison Inder, Haemostasis Nurse, Haematology Department, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Correspondence: Alison Inder, PO Box 151, Christchurch. Fax: (03) 364 0492; email: alison.inder@cdhb.govt.nz.
References:
  1. Hull RD, Raskob GE, Pineo GF et al. Subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin compared with continuous intravenous heparin in the treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 975-82.
  2. Simonneau G, Sors H, Charbonnier B et al for The Thésée Study Group. A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 663-9.
  3. The Columbus Investigators. Low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 657-62.
  4. Mattiasson I, Berntorp E, Bornhov S et al. Out-patient treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis. Int Angiol 1998; 17: 146-50.
  5. Fennerty A, Dolben J, Thomas P et al. Flexible induction dose regimen for warfarin and prediction of maintenance dose. B M J 1984; 288: 1268-70.
  6. Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Cogo A et al. The long-term clinical course of acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125: 1-7.
  7. Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN et al. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 809-15.
  8. Walker ID, Greaves M, Preston FE. Investigation and management of heritable thrombophilia. Brit J Haematol 2001; 114: 512-28.
  9. De Stefano V, Martinelli I, Mannucci PM et al. The risk of recurrent deep vein thrombosis among heterozygous carriers of both factor V Leiden and the G20210A prothrombin mutation. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 801-6.
  10. Wilson SJ, Wilbur K, Burton E, Anderson DR. Effect of patient weight on the anticoagulant response to adjusted therapeutic dose of low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. Haemostasis 2001; 31: 42-8.
  11. Holford NHG. Choosing the first dose. New Ethicals 1990; 27: 73-80.
  12. Crowther MA, Ginsberg JB, Kearon C et al. A randomised trial comparing 5-mg and 10-mg warfarin loading doses. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 46-8.
  13. Lindmarker P, Holmstrom M. Use of low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin), once daily, for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. A feasibility and health economic study in an outpatient setting. Swedish Venous Thrombosis Dalteparin Trial Group. J Intern Med 1996; 240: 395-401.
  14. Egermayer P, Inder A, Town GI. The use of warfarin in Christchurch for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. N Z Med J 2001; 114: 336-8.

This article was corrected 23 August 2002 to reflect the Erratum, NZ Med J 2002;115: URL http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/115-1160/151/
     
Current issue | Search journal | Archived issues | Classifieds | Hotline (free ads)
Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals