![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outpatient treatment of community acquired venous
thromboembolism - the Christchurch experience
David Heaton, Dug Yeo Han and Alison Inder
Heparin therapy, followed by oral anticoagulation has been
routine treatment for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) for many years. Usually
standard unfractionated heparin was administered by intravenous infusion and
monitored by activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) testing. This required
the patient to be in hospital until oral anticoagulation became established.
More recently, low molecular weight heparin has been available and given
subcutaneously, on a weight-determined dose without monitoring, results in
predictable anticoagulation. This is at least as safe and effective as
unfractionated heparin in the treatment of DVT and pulmonary embolism
(PE) 1,2. Trials have also shown that such
treatment can be given safely out of hospital3,
4. Outpatient anticoagulation for initial treatment of DVT and related
disorders began at Christchurch Hospital in March 1999. This report details our
experience of treating patients over the following 30 months and includes a
report on the use of an oral anticoagulation dosage protocol.
MethodsThe Haemostasis Service at
Christchurch Hospital was established to provide outpatient care for adults with
bleeding and clotting disorders, principally those with haemophilia or venous
thrombosis. It consists of a haemostasis nurse (full time) and a haemostasis
physician/haematologist (part time). Most patients with DVT were seen initially
in the Emergency Department, diagnosed by ultrasound, and then assessed by the
Internal Medicine Acute Team. If they had no other significant illness requiring
admission they were referred to the Haemostasis service for further management.
Patients arriving during normal working hours were often referred immediately.
Those arriving out of hours received an initial dose of low molecular weight
heparin and were referred to the clinic the following morning. Some patients
with extensive superficial thrombophlebitis or with non-massive PE were also
referred to the clinic.
Table 1. Dosing schedule for dalteparin and
warfarin.
The patients were seen daily by the haemostasis nurse
and at least once by the haemostasis physician. They received daily subcutaneous
injections of dalteparin (Fragmin) on a weight-based schedule (Table 1) with a
maximum dose of 20000iu. Warfarin therapy was commenced the same day as the
heparin or the following day and was administered according to a nomogram (Table
1) modified from one devised by Fennerty and
colleagues.5 The Fennerty protocol was modified
(a) to have a weight-determined dose on day 1, (b) to have a lower dose day 2,
(c) to have a zero dose if INR >3 and (d) to have fewer steps. Patients who
had commenced warfarin off protocol prior to referral or whose initial INR was
elevated were dosed empirically. Patients with superficial thrombophlebitis were
treated with therapeutic doses of dalteparin for two weeks without the addition
of warfarin.
Patient history and examination were recorded on a standard form and the following tests were routinely performed: prothrombin time (PT), APTT, blood count, ESR, creatinine, liver function tests, D-dimers (SimpliRED screening test or IL D-dimer assay), thrombophilia screen (antithrombin, protein S, protein C, activated protein C (APC) resistance, plasminogen, lupus anticoagulant–genetic tests for Factor V Leiden and the G20210A prothrombin mutation were performed if the APC resistance test was positive), chest X-ray and ECG. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) was performed in males aged over 40 years and pelvic ultrasound in females. The patients were monitored daily with clinical assessment of legs and pulse oximetry. Low molecular weight heparin was given for at least five days and until the INR was ≥2.0 on two consecutive days. Blood was taken for INR testing, warfarin tablets were provided and the patient was phoned later that day with warfarin dose advice. The patients were discharged to their general practitioner once oral anticoagulation was stable with a recommendation for the duration of therapy and DVT patients were offered a review at the clinic in one year’s time. Those who attended that clinic were assessed for history of clinical recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and for development of the post-phlebitic syndrome. The patient data were collected in the hospital notes and on a Microsoft Access database and statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel software. ResultsPrior to starting the DVT
outpatient service in March 1999, about 100 patients were admitted annually to
the Christchurch hospital for treatment of community acquired DVT. In the first
two and a half years of the outpatient service, we treated 228 patients with
VTE. During that same period another 49 patients were admitted for inpatient
care and 24 of those were in the first four months showing that the majority of
patients were managed by the outpatient service.
Table 2. Age/sex of patients and site of
thrombi.
There were 228 patients (124 male, 104 female) aged 16 to 90
years with a mean of 53.8 years (Table 2) who were treated by the outpatient
Haemostasis Service during this period. The primary diagnoses were lower limb
DVT (173) (right 70, left 103), upper limb DVT (10), superficial vein thrombosis
(17) and pulmonary embolism (28). 60 patients had suffered a prior venous
thrombosis.
Table 3. Risk factors for thrombosis.
128 patients had one clinical risk factor, 57 had two, five
had three or more and 38 had no recognisable clinical risk factor (Table 3). Of
the 34 patients with recent surgery, 20 had orthopaedic procedures. 22 patients
had active cancer, or cancer diagnosed or treated within the last six months. No
new cancers were diagnosed at presentation. Thrombophilia tests were performed
in 197 patients and the results appear in Table 3.
Table 4. D-dimer result and site of thrombus.
At the beginning of this 30 month period, D-dimers were
assessed as either positive or negative by the SimpliRED test and more recently
quantified by IL D-dimer assay (>250mg/L considered elevated/positive). 161
of the patients were tested for D-dimers before receiving any heparin and only
these results were analysed (Table 4). Of those with pulmonary embolism or iliac
or femoral DVT, 92% had positive D-dimers whereas only 74% of those with
popliteal or calf vein thrombosis had elevated levels. Of the eight upper limb
thrombi tested, seven had elevated levels and all nine lower limb superficial
vein thrombi tested had elevated levels.
Figure 1. INR results (+/- 1SD) in protocol
patients.
![]() 135 patients followed the warfarin dosing protocol. The mean
doses of warfarin were 14.6 (day 1), 4.9 (day 2), 5.5 (day 3), 6.2 (day 4), 6.6
(day 5) and 5.8 (day 6). The mean INRs were 1.0 (day 1), 1.2 (day 2), 1.9 (day
3), 2.1 (day 4), 2.2 (day 5) and 2.4 (day 6) (Figure 1). There were 29 INR
results over 3 during the first six days of treatment (3.6% of tests). The mean
duration of heparin therapy in this group was 5.8 days.
Patients in different age and weight groups achieved
comparable degrees of anticoagulation using our dosing protocol though this was
achieved with different doses of warfarin (Table 5).
Table 5. Warfarin dose (mg/day) and INR by age and
weight of patient.
The relationship was assessed between the mean warfarin dose
on days 3-5 (using protocol-determined doses) and the maintenance warfarin dose
on day 30 obtained by phone call to the patient’s general practice clinic
(Figure 2). There was a positive correlation
(R2 = 0.62 p=<0.001) and line of best fit
was y=0.969+0.739x.
Figure 2. Correlation of mean warfarin dose days 3-5
with maintenance dose day 30 in protocol patients only.
![]() 76 patients received empirical warfarin dosing. The mean
doses of warfarin were 9.6 (day 1), 6.6 (day 2), 5.6 (day 3), 5.6 (day 4), 6.5
(day 5) and 6.5mg (day 6). The mean INRs were 1.1 (day 1), 1.2 (day 2), 1.9 (day
3), 2.1 (day 4), 2.1 (day 5) and 2.2 (day 6). There were 20 INR results over 3
during the first six days of treatment (4.4% of tests). The mean duration of
heparin therapy in this group was 6.5 days. Seventeen patients (including eleven
with superficial vein thrombosis) received no warfarin and were treated with
heparin only.
No patients suffered clinical pulmonary embolism or
extension of DVT during the low molecular weight heparin treatment. Only one
patient suffered a haemorrhage during this time. This was a 68 year old woman
with an INR of 2.1 on day three who developed epistaxis which persisted despite
reversal of anticoagulation and required surgical management.
117 DVT patients were diagnosed more than one year prior to
the end of the study period and theoretically were eligible for a one-year
clinical review. Only 63 attended. Reasons for non-attendance included: failure
to receive booking advice, failure to attend, non-residence in Christchurch and
death. Three patients were known to have had a recurrence of DVT within the
first year. The Patient Management System (PMS) records of the other 54 patients
were accessed to identify if any had been admitted to a public hospital for
recurrent VTE but none had. Five patients are known to have died within the year
following diagnosis of DVT. All died of cancer at 0.3, 1,1,3 and 9 months
following DVT and all but one were known to have cancer when the DVT occurred.
Twelve of the 63 patients reviewed at one year had developed mild (none severe)
post phlebitic syndrome using the criteria of Prandoni et
al.6
DiscussionChristchurch Hospital is the only
hospital in the city that accepts acute general medical admissions. During the
study period most cases of suspected DVT in the community were sent to this
hospital for diagnosis and subsequent treatment.
The prevalence of laboratory and clinical prothrombotic
states was as expected (Table3). Height was not routinely recorded in these
patients hence obesity was not formally assessed. Although obesity is often
considered a risk factor for spontaneous DVT, this has been
challenged.7 The most common inherited
condition was factor V Leiden, found in 18% of those tested. Further cases of
the prothrombin mutation would probably have been detected if more patients had
been tested for that genetic mutation. The extent to which thrombophilia testing
should be done and how the results should influence patient management remains
somewhat controversial.8 Although most of our
patients were tested for thrombophilia, the results rarely influenced our
management. Based on the reported high recurrence rate in such
people,9 the patient with heterozygosity for
both factor V Leiden and the prothrombin mutation was advised to take prolonged
warfarin therapy but chose not to follow that advice.
Recommended schedules for dalteparin dosing had placed a
daily upper limit of 18000u as this had been used in initial clinical trials. As
there is evidence that the pharmacokinetics of low molecular weight heparin are
not significantly altered in obese subjects,10
we extended this upper limit to 20000u thus allowing a standard weight-based
dosing schedule for patients weighing up to 110kg (Table 1).
Traditionally warfarin therapy was started with a loading
dose. Most patients using the Fennerty protocol receive 10 mg on both day one
and day two and this dose was commonly used in our hospital. As the mean
maintenance dose is about 6mg, a “10,10” protocol constitutes a
loading dose on both day 1 and day 2 for most people. If a loading dose is to be
used, it seems more logical to give that on day 1 only and 15mg was chosen for
those >60Kg and 10mg for 60+Kg.11 Because of
concern with early over-anticoagulation and low factor VII levels with high
initial doses, loading doses are now less frequently used and a starting dose of
5mg is favoured. A study of 53 patients given an initial dose of either 5mg or
10mg demonstrated a similar time to achieving a therapeutic INR in both
groups.12 In that study, 4% of INR results in
the first six days of treatment were above 3 in the 5mg group compared to 12% in
the 10mg group. In our protocol patients, 3.6% of the tests were above 3 in the
same time period and in our non-protocol group 4.4% of the tests were above 3.
Our patients were not randomly allocated to protocol or non-protocol so no
formal comparison can be made between the groups. The results, however, suggest
that the use of our protocol, including the use of a loading dose, can
accommodate the differing dose requirements associated with varying age and
weight (Table 5) without an excess of over anticoagulation.
No analysis of the cost of this service compared to the cost
of alternative inpatient care was made for the purposes of this paper. We
believe, however, that the economic benefits observed elsewhere would
apply.13 A previous paper in this Journal
documented some deficiencies in the transfer of warfarinised patients from
Christchurch hospital to general practitioner
care.14 We expect that the more formalised
transfer protocol, accompanied by treatment recommendations, used by our service
will improve patient care during and following this transition. Although no
formal evaluation of patient satisfaction was performed, the number of
spontaneous complimentary statements made about the service impressed us. In
particular, the patients were pleased to be out of hospital and few found
difficulty with daily transport. The objective results of the first 30 months
activity of this clinic confirm that treatment of VTE can be provided
effectively and safely in the outpatient setting.
Author Information:;
David Heaton, Consultant Haematologist; Dug Yeo Han, Biostatistician; Alison
Inder, Haemostasis Nurse, Haematology Department, Christchurch Hospital,
Christchurch, New Zealand.
Correspondence:
Alison Inder, PO Box 151, Christchurch. Fax: (03) 364 0492; email: alison.inder@cdhb.govt.nz.
References:
This article was corrected
23 August 2002 to reflect the Erratum, NZ Med J 2002;115: URL
http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/115-1160/151/
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |