![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strike action by senior medical staff in Timaru – how
did this come about?
John Rietveld
Strike action by senior medical staff has never occurred in
New Zealand until now. It has been underway in Timaru Hospital since 3 February
2003, in the form of withdrawal of elective services one day a week, progressing
through the days of the week over a five-week period.
The decision by senior medical staff to take formal
industrial action was not taken lightly, and was preceded by long and heated
debates until all alternative avenues of dispute resolution were
exhausted.
How did this situation come about?
The collective senior medical staff contract at Timaru
Hospital expired on 1 July 2002. Negotiations for a new contract were
immediately instigated with the aid of the Executive Director of the ASMS, Ian
Powell. Right from the beginning, it was clear the negotiation was going to be
difficult, with management dismissing outright the senior medical staff’s
concerns and also rejection of their new contract offer. A counter offer tabled
by Timaru Hospital management was in fact a disguised reduction in salary with
no attempt to address the senior medical staff concerns. Over a period of six
months, repeated discussions clearly showed that the Timaru Hospital management
team was not even prepared to offer a salary increase to cover the inflation
rate and they had no intention of changing the status quo on any other
issue.
The salary of the senior medical staff at Timaru Hospital is
at the lowest end of the national pay range, with the majority of the staff at
the lower end of the scale, eg, a staff member with 25+ years’ continuous
service with Timaru Hospital would be at Step 7 of the 15-step scale. These low
remuneration rates have largely come about as the result of the archaic and
heavy-handed management approach to contract negotiation over the years and the
threat of closure of the Hospital if it exceeded its fiscal budget allocated by
the Government.
Associated with this are years of systemic dismissal by
hospital management of the concerns and problems of senior staff. More recently,
these included issues such as the lack of hospital beds to meet clinical
demands, the lack of modern equipment, the onerous nature of the on-call roster,
the failure to agree on an updated job size and description, the poor rate of
remuneration resulting in retention and recruiting difficulties, and the lack of
junior staff support. Previous dialogue with management on these issues had
fallen on deaf ears. The senior medical staff felt it was time to make a stand,
as these issues had reached a crisis point and could not be dismissed
again.
The main issues that needed addressing were:
We were able to come to an
agreement with management that they would look into employing more staff to
address the onerous nature of the rosters in the areas in which the highest call
back occurred, namely orthopaedic surgery and general surgery.
Management also made an undertaking to go into formal
negotiations on updating job sizing and job descriptions.
Management also agreed to address the pay issue by agreeing
to an increase equivalent to our neighbouring DHBs, but would not address the
issue of our position at the bottom of the national pay scale.
The lack of registrar cover and junior staff support was not
considered to be worth any offer by management, despite our insistence that this
was the key issue. Despite multiple requests by senior medical staff for
independent arbitration, or for the Board and Board Chairman to become involved,
management were not prepared to discuss these options or even contemplate other
methods of arbitration. This left us with no choice but to resort to industrial
action.
Previous votes of no confidence in hospital management by
senior medical staff were of no merit, so this avenue was not pursued. Mass
resignation was considered, but it was agreed that industrial action in the form
of one-month rolling strikes of all elective services (all acute services would
remain unaffected) would be the most effective course of action and the least
disruptive to our patients.
Strike action was not entered into lightly and has not been
without its toll of the senior staff. On instigation of the strike action, we
were overwhelmed by the enormity of the support from the people of South
Canterbury. We received full support from the public, the local media, and all
of our patients.
Unfortunately, after two weeks of strike action, management
remained intransigent, and their new offer was a retrenchment of a previous
offer, so drawing us further apart. By now, public support on the doctors’
stance was swelling, with independent bodies, including the local chapter of
Grey Power, City councillors, and the Mayor of Timaru, calling for a public
meeting to bear pressure on hospital management to resolve the issues and to
help clarify the issues for the general public.
The toll of senior staff became evident, with one of our
most senior staff members tabling his resignation as the industrial action,
which he supported, seemed to make no difference regarding concerns over lack of
junior staff support. This increased the public support for the doctors and put
pressure on the District Health Board to either get involved or to instigate
independent arbitration.
The medical staff also implored the Minister of Health to
require the DHB to become involved. We believe as a result of this intervention
that headway was again achieved. Informal talks with the Chairman of the Board
were instigated within 24 hours of our request to the Minister. This dialogue
included instruction by the Chairman to management to improve their offer,
resulting in a new offer, which is under consideration and goes some way to
addressing issues. It includes a minimal compensation package, while the
possibility of the introduction of registrars and more junior staff is being
contemplated.
However, whatever the outcome of this latest offer, the net
result has been a complete breakdown of any confidence and trust the senior
medical staff had in the hospital management team. These wounds will take years
to heal.
Author information:
John A Rietveld, Orthopaedic Surgeon, Timaru Hospital, Timaru
Correspondence: Mr
John A Rietveld, Orthopaedic Department, Timaru Hospital, Private Bag 911,
Timaru. Fax: (03) 684 1532; email: jarcer@xtra.co.nz
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |