![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suicide in New Zealand II: a review of risk factors and
prevention
Annette Beautrais
This paper aims to provide a summary of suicide in New
Zealand. The previous paper examined time trends and the epidemiology of
suicide.1 The objectives of this paper are to:
(a) provide a summary of the research evidence about risk and protective factors
for suicide and attempted suicide in young people aged <25 years and adults
aged ≥25; and (b) examine the implications of this knowledge for
approaches to suicide prevention. The review is based upon New Zealand research,
supplemented by evidence from the international literature.
To place this discussion in perspective it is useful to
begin by reviewing rates of suicidal behaviours amongst both youth (age
15–24) and adults (≥25 years). During the last decade, two sets of
factors have focused public and professional attention on youth suicide in New
Zealand. First, rates of youth suicide increased dramatically in the mid-1980s,
peaking in the mid-1990s. Second, this increase led to New Zealand having high
youth suicide rates compared with other OECD countries. In turn, concerns about
these matters have raised important issues about the risk factors that
predispose young people to attempt to take their lives.
However, although current policy emphases in New Zealand
have focused on youth suicide, the majority of those who die by suicide are
adults aged ≥25: 75.6% of the 516 deaths by suicide in 1999 (www.nzhis.govt.nz). Almost half of all these
adult suicides were males aged 25–44. This review also considers health
and related issues associated with risks of suicide in adults.
A conceptual model of youth suicidal behaviourTo organise the review of risk and
protective factors for suicidal behaviour into an orderly conceptual framework,
Figure 1 provides a model of the development of youth suicidal behaviours. This
model assumes that the factors that contribute to suicidal behaviour may be
organised into six domains that are conceptually related: genetic and biologic
factors; social and demographic background; childhood adversity; personality
characteristics; life stresses; and mental health factors. The model further
assumes that four sets of factors (genetic and biologic factors; social factors;
family factors; personality characteristics) act as broad, ‘distal’
determinants of an individual’s vulnerability or resiliency to suicidal
behaviour. Those most vulnerable tend to come from socially disadvantaged
backgrounds; to have genetic and biologic predispositions to suicidal
behaviours; to be exposed to childhood adversity and to have personality and
cognitive difficulties. Those with most resiliency tend to show the opposite
profile. These four sets of factors influence both an individual’s
vulnerability and resiliency to mental illness and his/her level of life-event
exposure. Mental illness and exposure to stress and adversity are the more
proximal determinants of suicidal behaviour.
Since research evidence suggests that a broadly similar
conceptual model applies to adult suicidal behaviour, in the interests of
brevity this review will use the framework in Figure 1 to review the factors
that contribute to risk of, and protection from, suicide, for youth and for
adults aged ≥25, noting the similarities and differences in risk factors
between the two groups. This model is based upon an empirically-derived,
individual risk-factor approach. While alternative paradigms for suicidal
behaviour (including, for example, social causation, psychoanalytic and
philosophical models) have been proposed, there are difficulties in reconciling
these theoretical frameworks with the existing evidence on risk factors for
suicide.2 For this reason, this summary is
based not upon a particular theory of suicide but upon a general conceptual
model of the ways in which suicidal behaviour is influenced by various
risk-factor domains.
Figure 1. Conceptual model of domains of factors for
suicidal behaviours amongst young people (click here to
view Figure 1)
Genetic and biologic factorsA family history of suicidal
behaviour is a strong risk factor for suicide and suicide attempt for both youth
and adults,3 suggesting that there are genetic
factors that predispose individuals either to suicide
per se or to the psychiatric disorders
with which suicide is associated. Using twin designs, studies have suggested
that up to 45% of the variance in suicidal behaviour may be genetic in
origin.4 In a second line of research,
researchers have attempted to identify biologic and genetic markers for
suicidality, focusing particularly on those involving the serotonergic
system.5 More work is required to clearly
identify, and clarify, the role of a range of genetic and biologic factors in
suicidality.
Social and demographic factorsSeveral New Zealand studies have
examined linkages between suicide attempts and suicide in young people, and a
series of measures of socioeconomic and educational
disadvantage.6,7 Rates of suicidal behaviour
were elevated amongst young people with poor educational qualifications and from
families with low socioeconomic status. It is likely that the major route by
which socioeconomic adversity leads to suicidal behaviour is as a result of
linkages between socioeconomic factors and mental health and adjustment in
adolescence.7
Similar trends have been found for adults and older
adults.8,9 In addition, adults who die by
suicide are more likely than the general population to have never married, to be
divorced or widowed, and to live alone.10,11
Some of these findings may be explained by high rates of psychopathology in
those with serious suicidal behaviour (see below).
Childhood adversityNumerous studies suggest clear
linkages between exposure to childhood adversity and risk of later suicidal
behaviour amongst young people. These studies have found elevated rates of
suicidal behaviours amongst young people who have experienced: parental
separation or divorce; sexual, physical or emotional abuse and neglect; parental
psychopathology; family discord and violence; impaired parent–child
relationships; and experience of institutional or welfare
care.12–14 In general, experiences of
childhood adversities tend to act cumulatively, with those most at risk of
suicidal behaviour being characterised by multiple childhood
disadvantage.2,7,15
For adults, compared with youth, early childhood factors
appear to be less influential in risks of suicidal behaviours. The likely reason
for this is that, with the passage of time, the effects of adverse childhood
experiences become overlaid by other life experiences, resulting in earlier
experiences playing a decreasing role in the aetiology of adult suicide.
Nevertheless, older adults (≥55 years) with serious suicidal behaviour
tend to have histories of childhood adversity (including sexual abuse and poor
paternal care), suggesting that early exposure to such adversity may confer
enduring vulnerability for the development of mood disorders and suicidal
behaviour.16
Personality characteristicsRisks of suicidal behaviour are
increased amongst young people with particular personality
characteristics,17,18 including high levels of
neuroticism, hopelessness, impulsivity, risk taking, and low self-esteem. It is
likely that personality is linked to suicidality by two major pathways. First,
certain personality traits (neuroticism, for example) act as predisposing
factors for mental disorders, notably depression and substance-use disorders. In
turn, these disorders are associated with increased risk of suicidal behaviour
(see below). Second, these personality traits may also influence the ways in
which young people react to adverse life events.
Similar personality traits (hopelessness, neuroticism,
anxiety, timidity, cognitive rigidity, impulsivity, aggression, and a strong
sense of personal independence) have been shown to be associated with suicidal
behaviours in adults and older adults.19 In
addition, elevated rates of suicidal behaviour have been found amongst those
with borderline personality disorder and antisocial personality
disorder.16,20
Mental health factorsWhilst genetic and biologic factors,
social factors, childhood adversity, and personality characteristics may act to
determine individual susceptibility to suicidal behaviours, the major risk
factors for suicidal behaviours are mental disorders. Four disorders have
consistently been identified as making major contributions to youth suicidal
behaviours: mood disorders (including depression, bipolar disorders);
substance-use disorders (alcohol, cannabis and other drug abuse and dependence);
conduct disorder, antisocial and offending behaviours; and anxiety
disorders.21
A consequence of the linkages between mental disorder and
suicidality is that many young people making suicide attempts or dying by
suicide will have a history of contact with medical, welfare and related
services for mental health problems. New Zealand research suggests that the
majority (80%) of young people making serious suicide attempts have had contact,
at some time in their lives, with such services for psychiatric problems, with
30% having a history of psychiatric hospital admission prior to making suicide
attempts.22
Similarly, mental disorders prove to be the strongest
predictors of suicidal behaviours in adults. These disorders include mood
disorders, substance-use disorders, antisocial behaviours and non-affective
psychosis, and there is a clear trend for risks of suicide attempt and suicide
to increase with increasing comorbidity.16,23
Findings suggest that individuals with two or more disorders had odds of serious
suicide attempt that were 90 times of those with no
disorders.24
The contribution of psychiatric illness to suicide risk
tends to increase with increasing age: mental disorder (particularly depression)
plays a more dominant role in determining suicide risk in adults ≥45 years
than in younger individuals.25
Given the strong role of mental disorders in adult suicide,
individuals who die by suicide or make suicide attempts tend to have histories
of mental illness, of previous suicide attempts, and of mental health care,
including psychiatric hospital
admission.23
Psychosocial stressesVarious forms of psychosocial stress
or discrimination may act to precipitate suicidal
behaviours.14 For youth, research has tended to
focus on three areas:
In common
with findings for youth, research suggests that exposure to recent adverse life
experiences plays an influential role in precipitating suicidal behaviours in
adults. For adults, the key life events that increase risk of suicidal behaviour
are interpersonal losses and conflicts (including marital separation, serious
family arguments, unemployment, change of residence, retirement), financial
problems and job problems.9,25
Some of the life events that precede serious suicidal
behaviour appear to be generated by an individual’s own
behaviour.32 Furthermore, specific life events
(separation, serious family arguments, financial problems and unemployment)
often appear to arise from problems with
alcohol.32 Research evidence also suggests age
and gender differences in the association between life events and suicidal
behaviour, with younger subjects likely to have more life events than older
subjects, and males likely to experience more life events than
females.32
In older adults, health impairments, somatic illnesses and
declining physical capacity play a role in precipitating suicidal behaviour,
with some evidence that physical health problems play an increasingly
influential role with increasing age, particularly for males. In a study of
subjects aged ≥65 who died by suicide, visual impairment, neurological
disorders, and malignant disease were associated with increased risk of
suicide.33
A further set of factors associated with suicidal behaviours
in adults relates to various forms of social interaction. Those making serious
suicide attempts are likely to be characterised by high rates of social
isolation, feelings of loneliness, poor social support and lack of a close,
confiding relationship.16,23
Protective factorsThere is growing interest in the
exploration of a range of protective factors that may mitigate risks of suicidal
behaviour. This interest has been motivated by the observation that many people
with exposure to risk factors do not develop suicidal tendencies. Only a
minority of those with depression develop suicidal behaviour, for
example.
Such observations suggest that there may be a range of
protective factors that act to mitigate the effects of exposure to risk factors.
Although there has been increasing interest in protective or resiliency factors
for youth suicidal behaviour,34 there has been
relatively little research in this area. Rather, many of the factors suggested
as protective factors for suicidal behaviour have been speculative, or have been
extrapolated from research in other fields.
Factors that have been suggested as providing protection or
resiliency against the development of suicidal behaviours include: an adaptable
temperament; good self-esteem; problem-solving skills; social support and social
networks; a good emotional relationship with at least one person in the family;
positive school experiences; and spiritual
faith.34
In New Zealand, some of these issues have been addressed
using data from a 21-year longitudinal study of a birth cohort of over 1000
young people.35 This analysis identified a
series of factors that acted to exacerbate or mitigate risks of suicidal
behaviour amongst young people with depression. These factors included: a family
history of suicidal behaviour; childhood sexual abuse; neuroticism;
novelty-seeking behaviour; self-esteem; and peer affiliations. Positive
configurations of these factors (no family history of suicide; no childhood
sexual abuse; low neuroticism; low novelty-seeking behaviour; high self-esteem;
and absence of deviant peer affiliations) increased resiliency to suicide
attempt, whereas negative configurations acted to increase vulnerability to
suicidal behaviour.
In contrast to the current emphasis on protective factors in
youth suicide, there has been relatively little research interest in the role of
protective factors for suicide in adults. One exception has been research that
suggests that having children acts as a protective factor for females and
minimises risk of suicidal behaviour.36 A
further set of protective factors is suggested by a recent study of adults
≥65 years, which found that having a hobby and actively participating in
organisations decreased suicide risk.9 More
generally, these findings perhaps suggest that social attachments and social
obligations may form important protective factors against suicidal
behaviour.
Issues for older adultsA population of particular interest
are older adults, ≥65 years. Until the mid-1970s, international and New
Zealand suicide rates were highest amongst older males and concerns centred on
this group. When suicide rates amongst young males in New Zealand increased
dramatically from the mid-1970s, the focus of interest moved from older people
to youth. In many countries, however, there was no substantial increase in youth
suicide rates at this time, and interest in the issue of suicide rates amongst
older adults was maintained. Internationally, there has been a recent resurgence
of interest in older-adult suicide, with recognition that the progressive ageing
of populations in the industrialized world is likely to increase absolute
numbers of suicides and suicide attempts among older adults. Further concerns
about suicidal behaviour in older adults have been prompted by recent focus on
the issues of assisted suicide, euthanasia, ‘right to die’
arguments, longer life expectancy for the elderly, and limitations on the
availability of health resources.
Suicidal behaviour in older adults has a number of features
that are not shared with younger age groups.37
Older adults make fewer non-fatal suicide attempts than younger people. Reasons
for this may include their being physically more frail, and therefore less
likely to survive suicide attempts; that they are more often living alone, and
so less likely to be found in time to be helped after a suicide attempt; and
that they use more lethal methods of suicide attempt, perhaps reflecting a
stronger intent to die. Finally, although the risk factors for elderly suicide
overlap with risk factors for other age groups, amongst older age groups mental
health factors, predominantly depression, play a more significant
role.16
Risk and protective factors for suicide in MaoriThis review provides a perspective
on risk and protective factors in suicide from population-based studies. The
extent to which the findings from these studies apply to Maori is largely
unknown. In particular, there have been suggestions that, while Maori may share
risk factors with non-Maori, their unique cultural and historical background may
present different risk factors and interpretations for suicidality than those
for other New Zealand groups:38,39
‘There are additional risk
factors which apply only to Maori and other indigenous youth. These are the risk
factors relevant to cultural alienation, the impact of history through
intergenerational modelling and behavioural transfer, and confusion over
identity.’38
The extent to which this is so remains to be determined, but
this issue is being investigated by projects funded by the Health Research
Council focused on risk and protective factors for Maori youth suicide. Parallel
research is being conducted for Pacific Island youth (www.hrc.govt.nz).
In contrast to youth suicide, where Maori have higher rates
than non-Maori, rates of suicide for Maori adults ≥25 years are similar
to, or lower than, non-Maori rates (www.nzhis.govt.nz). There has been
relatively little research to examine the extent to which risk and protective
factors for suicidal behaviour in Maori adults differ from, or are similar to,
those for non-Maori. There is some limited suggestion that aetiological factors
may differ with ethnic identification. For example, official statistics suggest
that suicide amongst Maori aged ≥45 is virtually non-existent, suggesting
culturally specific factors that protect this group against suicide. In 1999,
amongst those aged ≥45, only one Maori person died by suicide, compared
with 154 non-Maori. In addition, research in the 1980s suggested that
approximately one quarter of all Maori male suicide deaths were accounted for by
suicides in prisons.40 The extent to which this
trend holds at the present time is not known.
Implications for prevention: youthThe research findings outlined above
provide the foundations for developing prevention approaches to reduce suicidal
behaviour. The evidence suggests that such policies should be organised around
two major themes:
1. Youth mental
health
While a range of social, personality, childhood and related
factors make contributions to risks of suicidal behaviour, by far the largest
contribution comes from mental health measures and, particularly, mood
disorders, previous suicidal behaviour, and prior mental health
problems.41 These findings imply that a major
plank of any suicide prevention strategy must involve approaches that aim to
improve the detection, treatment, management and prevention of these disorders
in young people.
There are a number of approaches by which this general
objective might be achieved:
(a)
Population-based programmes The most
general way is through population-based approaches that encourage positive
mental health, improved public understanding of mental illness, and improved
detection, treatment and management of mental disorders. For suicide prevention
two approaches may be of particular use: initiatives focusing on the better
recognition, treatment and management of depression in young people; and
parallel programmes designed to address substance-use disorders. For example,
population-based drug prevention programmes delivered in schools have been found
to reduce both drug and polydrug
use.42
(b) Clinical
interventions Although population-based initiatives may reduce rates of
mental disorders within the population, inevitably a fraction of the population
will develop such disorders. This requires the availability of adequate
psychiatric services to address the mental health needs of young people within
tertiary, secondary and primary care.
(c) Support for at-risk
youth A significant proportion of those dying by suicide have made a
previous suicide attempt, suggesting that one approach to suicide prevention is
through evidence-based, targeted programmes that attempt to address the
psychiatric and other needs of young people following their contact with health
services for suicide attempts. Research has identified a further population of
at-risk young people – specifically, those with conduct disorder and
antisocial behaviours – suggesting that another approach to suicide
prevention is through the development of evidence-based prevention programmes
targeted to young people in juvenile justice programmes and institutions. An
example of support programmes for at-risk youth is provided by a programme
targeting youth at risk for high-school dropout, of whom approximately 40% have
been shown to be also at risk for suicidal
behaviour.43 Those who participated in a
classroom programme designed to provide support and increase skills were found
to have decreased levels of suicide-risk behaviours, depression, hopelessness,
anger and stress, and increased levels of social support, self-esteem and
personal control.44
2. Early
intervention
A second theme that pervades research into youth suicidal
behaviour is that a small but conspicuous group of young people vulnerable to
suicidal behaviours is characterised by childhood histories of social
disadvantage and family dysfunction. These findings suggest that an important
step in reducing the number of young people who are vulnerable to suicidal
behaviours is through programmes that reduce the number of children exposed to
unsatisfactory, disadvantaged or dysfunctional environments that lead to risk of
later suicide attempt.
There are a number of strategies by which this target might
be achieved:
(a) Population-based
programmes Programmes designed to reduce social inequity and social
discrimination may make an effective contribution to youth suicide prevention by
providing an equitable social environment in which other, more-targeted
approaches to suicide prevention would have their best chance of success.
Another population-based approach is focused on the development of general
mental health programmes, which aim to foster good mental health skills to
promote resiliency and address the psychosocial needs of young people exposed to
stress and adversity. There is increasing emphasis in youth suicide prevention
efforts, for example in the USA, on school-based competency-promoting and
stress-reducing programmes to reduce risks of mental disorders and behaviours
with which suicidal behaviour is
associated.45
(b) Support for at-risk
families and children A further approach to youth suicide prevention lies
with the provision of family support and early intervention programmes targeted
to at-risk families and designed to ameliorate infant and early-childhood
exposure to family disadvantage and dysfunction, and to optimise childhood and
adolescent educational and life opportunities.
In addition, an important New Zealand research finding has
been that young people in welfare care are at increased risk of suicidal
behaviour compared with their peers who do not access welfare
care.46 A further approach to suicide
prevention may lie in developing targeted programmes to ensure young people in
welfare care receive adequate, supportive care and protection, and appropriate
mental health services.
A major population-based component of many national suicide
prevention strategies focuses on restricting access to means of suicide.
However, the ubiquitous availability of the most common methods of suicide in
New Zealand (hanging, vehicle exhaust gas), suggest that there is limited scope
for the restriction of access to means of suicide to play a substantial role in
New Zealand suicide prevention, for youth or adults.
Most young people who die by suicide are not teenagers but
young adults aged 20–24 years. However, the majority of those who make
non-fatal suicide attempts are young (predominantly female) teenagers. This
observation implies that youth suicide prevention programmes need to be
inclusive and developed for the entire age range 15–24 years. To date,
youth suicide programmes have tended to focus on school-based approaches. There
is a dearth of prevention programmes appropriate for young males aged
19–24 who have left school.
The effective prevention of youth suicide will likely
require a multi-sectoral approach that integrates both individual-level and
population-level programmes to minimise the circumstances that encourage
suicidal behaviours in young people. There is also a need to develop a
public/private partnership to address youth suicide prevention, with this
partnership coordinated across government agencies and integrated across public
and private sectors. Such structures will require adequate government and
community support and resources to ensure that reductions in youth suicide rates
are pursued using empirically developed and well-evaluated programmes.
Implications for prevention: adultsThe profile of risk and protective
factors in adults is similar in many ways to that for youth. The major exception
is that childhood and family experiences appear to play a lesser role in
suicidal behaviours by older people and, conversely, mental health factors and
recent life events emerge as being more influential. This is particularly
evident for mood disorders, which play an increasingly significant role in the
aetiology of suicide with increasing age. For example, in the Canterbury Suicide
Project, amongst those aged 55 and older, individuals with a current mood
disorder had odds of suicidal behaviour and attempt that were over 150 times
higher than the odds for those without mood
disorders.16 In contrast, amongst those aged 25
to 45 the odds ratio was 20.25 The major
implication of these findings is that for adult, and particularly older adult,
populations prevention strategies should focus very strongly on the detection,
treatment and management of depression and the better recognition of the life
event, social, family and related factors that may contribute to the development
of depression in older adults.
An example of such approaches is provided by a structured
education programme for general physicians on the island of Gotland that focused
on the recognition and treatment of depression. Several outcome measures were
assessed, including antidepressant and anxiolytic prescribing, referrals for
psychiatric consultation, psychiatric inpatient treatment, sick leave for
depression, and suicides. Positive results were found for the programme,
although the findings were the subject of some debate. The suicide rate
subsequently increased, coincident with the departure of almost half of the
physicians trained in the
programme.47,48
A further example of a community-level programme is provided
by the US Air Force suicide prevention programme, which appears to have reduced
suicide rates by focusing on improving knowledge and attitudes about suicide,
increasing identification of at-risk individuals and improving access to help
and treatment (http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/pubfiles/af/44/afpam44-160/afpam44-160.pdf).
A similar approach could be adopted by workplace organisations and institutions
with high rates of suicide.
Many adult and older-adult
suicidal individuals appear to have generally poor social circumstances. The
extent to which these circumstances arise from psychopathology (particularly
depression) and personality traits, and the extent to which it might be possible
to encourage social participation by at-risk individuals is an area in which
further research is needed. A promising finding in this area, for example, is
suggested by reduced suicide rates (at least for females) reported for an
elderly population who were supported by regular telephone contact and needs
assessment.49
The majority (75%) of those who die by suicide have contact
with primary-care providers in the year prior to death, and one third have
contact with mental health services.50 In the
final month before death, 45% of suicide victims have contact with primary-care
providers, with rates of contact higher amongst older, compared with younger,
adults. These contacts suggest primary care providers are potentially well
placed to detect and assist a substantial fraction of those with mood disorders
and suicidal behaviours. However, there is also a need to improve public
knowledge and attitudes about mental illness, depression and treatment, in order
to encourage and support help-seeking behaviours amongst those adults,
predominantly males, who do not presently go to primary care providers. For this
group, there is also a need to develop alternative sources of community-based
support.
The need for a national suicide prevention strategy for all agesIn recent years, the emphasis in New
Zealand policy in suicide prevention has been almost exclusively in the area of
youth suicide. This is reflected in the fact that New Zealand has a National
Youth Suicide Prevention Strategy but no parallel strategy for adults. In
addition, responsibility for youth suicide prevention programmes is vested in
the Ministry of Youth Affairs. There are no parallel structures within the
Ministry of Health for adults and older adults. New Zealand has (unusually)
appointed an Associate Minister of Health with special responsibility for youth
suicide prevention, yet there is no ministerial responsibility for suicide
prevention in general.
This emphasis on youth suicide has been motivated by
continued claims that New Zealand has ‘the highest rate of youth suicide
in the world’. This claim is not correct and, furthermore, has obscured
the fact that the majority of those dying by suicide in New Zealand are not
youth but rather adults aged 25–45. These considerations suggest that
there is an urgent need to develop a national suicide prevention policy that is
applicable to all age groups, and accords all age groups equal levels of care
and protection. The above review suggests that much of this policy can be
borrowed and adapted from existing youth suicide prevention policies. However,
policies for adults and older adults may need to place less emphasis on
childhood, family and social factors, and greater emphasis on mental health
factors and particularly on the role of depression.
New Zealand was notable in being amongst the first countries
to develop a national youth suicide prevention strategy. However, in the area of
adult and older adult suicide prevention New Zealand now lags behind other
countries in that research, policy and political interest have virtually ignored
the problem of suicide in adults. The result is that New Zealand is now unique
in the world in having a youth suicide prevention policy but no parallel policy
to address suicide prevention in adults. The United States, the United Kingdom,
Australia, Canada, Finland, Sweden, Norway, and a number of other countries now
have suicide prevention strategies for people of all ages. It does not seem
acceptable for policy processes in New Zealand to have disenfranchised the
majority of those dying by suicide in this way.
Author information:
Annette L Beautrais, Principal Investigator, Canterbury Suicide Project,
Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Christchurch
Correspondence: Dr A
L Beautrais, Canterbury Suicide Project, Christchurch School of Medicine and
Health Sciences, P O Box 4345, Christchurch. Fax: (03) 372 0405; email: suicide@chmeds.ac.nz
References:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |