![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buteyko: an effective complementary therapy
We agree with the statement made by Holt and Beasley in
their recent letter to the NZMJ (http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/117-1188/754/)1
that asthma poses a significant economic and health burden to New Zealanders. It
is acknowledged that the evidence base supporting the use of the Buteyko
Breathing Technique (BBT) in asthma is modest. Nonetheless, the four trials
currently published in the peer-reviewed medical literature uniformly exhibit
positive results with similar magnitude of
effect.2–5 To dismiss this growing body
of evidence with inflammatory epithets such as ‘pseudoscience’
contributes nothing to the debate.
Holt and Beasley note that there was no difference in
FEV1 between the two groups in our
study,4 and erroneously extrapolate a lack of
efficacy of BBT. Most patients, and many doctors as well, would regard
maintenance of equivalent ventilatory status with the use of vastly less
medication (50%
reduction in inhaled steroid and 85% in β2-agonist) as a positive
outcome.
Holt
and Beasley fail to appreciate that both groups in our trial were instructed to
use β2-agonist on a strictly as-needed basis. BBT teachings are consistent
with the advice of the Asthma and Respiratory Foundation, which
encourages continued use of preventer medication titrated to the need for
reliever medication and use of reliever medication on demand only. We regard BBT
as a complementary approach to standard asthma management rather than an
alternative.
Conduct of trials on complementary and alternative therapies
is difficult. Objective outcome measurement, randomisation, and blinding all
require special consideration, as discussed in our paper. We acknowledge that
access to funding for investigation of non-drug therapies may prove particularly
difficult to mainstream researchers, many of whom have built careers on research
sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry. In light of the social and economic
burden of asthma, and the potential benefit of BBT, the challenge to such groups
to meaningfully contribute to the evidence is clear.
Patrick McHugh
Director, Emergency Department Fergus
Aitcheson
Consultant Physician Bruce Duncan
Medical Director Gisborne Hospital Frank Houghton
Health Geographer Mid-Western Health Board, Limerick, Ireland References:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |