![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Antibiotic resistance in
Helicobacter pylori: is it a problem in
New Zealand?
Dilruba Ahmed, Heather Brooks, Michelle McConnell, Gil
Barbezat
The association of the Gram negative, spiral bacterium
Helicobacter pylori with gastritis,
gastric and duodenal ulcers, gastric adenocarcinoma, and mucosa-associated
lymphoid tissue lymphoma is now well
established.1
Helicobacter pylori
has a worldwide distribution, and serological studies in Auckland, New Zealand
indicate infection is particularly common among Maori and Pacific Island
communities.2 Prevalence is much lower amongst
the European population, particularly in the South
Island.3,4 Successful eradication of
H. pylori infection depends on a number
factors, one of the most important being the use of an antibiotic regimen to
which the infecting strain is susceptible.5
Triple therapy combining an acid inhibiting agent (proton pump inhibitor) with
clarithromycin and either amoxycillin or metronidazole is recommended as a
first-line treatment in the Maastricht Consensus Report .
Second-line therapy should include a combination of an acid
inhibitor with bismuth salt, metronidazole, and tetracycline or quadruple
therapy (standard triple therapy as above plus
bismuth).6,7 In recent years, the emergence of
antibiotic-resistant strains has been widely reported, and these pose a
significant threat to the successful treatment of
H. pylori
infection.5,6,8–10 For most bacterial
infections, antibiotic susceptibility testing is routinely carried out but the
specialised growth requirements of H.
pylori preclude such tests in most diagnostic medical laboratories. There
is a dearth of published New Zealand studies which include data on the
antibiotic susceptibility of this
pathogen.11,12 In practice,
H. pylori infections are currently
being treated in most centres without any up-to-date knowledge concerning the
incidence of resistant strains.
The aim of the present study was to determine the antibiotic
susceptibility of H. pylori isolated
from gastric biopsies of patients referred to Dunedin Public Hospital because of
upper gastrointestinal symptoms.
Materials and methodsPatients—Over
a 13-month period, patients presenting for routine gastroscopy in the Endoscopy
Unit of Dunedin Public Hospital were invited to participate in the study. The
patient inclusion criteria comprised a history of upper gastrointestinal tract
complaints requiring histological definition, symptoms suggestive of peptic
ulcer, and where gastric biopsies were indicated from the physical findings at
endoscopy.
Patients who did not give consent, or who had medical
contraindications for taking biopsies, were excluded from the study. Ethical
approval for the collection of extra biopsies was granted by the Otago Ethics
Committee, Health Funding Authority, Dunedin.
Gastric biopsy
samples—Upper endoscopy was performed and duplicate gastric biopsy
samples from both the antrum and the corpus of each patient were obtained. One
pair of samples (antrum and corpus) was subjected to histopathological
examination in the Histopathology Department of Dunedin Public Hospital, and
Giemsa-stained H. pylori identified by
light microscopy. The other pair of samples was cultured for
H. pylori as described below.
Samples for bacteriological examination were placed in
Stuart’s Transport medium (Oxoid, Hampshire, England), transported to the
laboratory on ice and processed within 2 hours. Cleaning and sterilisation of
endoscopes and biopsy equipment were maintained according to nationally agreed
criteria and a monthly sterility check performed on the endoscopic flush
fluid.13
Culture and
identification of H.
pylori—Biopsy samples were
cultured on Columbia agar with Dent H.
pylori antibiotic supplement (Oxoid, Hampshire, England), containing 7%
laked horse blood (Invitrogen, Auckland, New Zealand) and incubated in a
microaerophilic atmosphere for up to 10 days as described by
Goodwin.14 Colonies were identified as
H. pylori as previously
described.14
H. pylori NCTC 11637 (type strain) was
used as a positive control for the culture conditions and identification tests.
Antibiotic
susceptibility tests—Antibiotic susceptibility was determined on
Mueller Hinton agar (Difco, Becton Dickinson & Co., Sparks, Maryland, USA )
containing 5% sheep blood (Invitrogen, Auckland, New Zealand) by the epsilometer
test using metronidazole, clarithromycin, amoxycillin, and doxycycline E-test
strips (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). The tests were carried out according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. Strains were considered resistant when the
MIC for metronidazole was >8 mg/L; clarithromycin >1 mg/L; amoxycillin
>1mg/L; and doxycycline >1 mg/L.15
H. pylori NCTC
11637 was used as a sensitive control.
ResultsH.
pylori was cultured from the biopsies of 58 of the 134 patients recruited
for the study. Histopathological examination revealed
H. pylori along the mucosal surface in
57 of these patients and sections of the gastric mucosa showed typical
infiltration of mixed inflammatory cells composed of lymphocytes, plasma cells,
and occasional polymorphs and eosinophils. A single patient was culture
positive, but histology negative and endoscopic examination in this patient
indicated the presence of gastritis, duodenitis and duodenal ulcer consistent
with H. pylori infection.
In the 58 H. pylori
culture positive patients, the clinical findings at endoscopy were: 22 patients
had duodenal ulcers; 10 had gastric ulcers; 4 had duodenitis; and 12 had
gastritis. In the remaining 10 patients, findings were inconclusive. There was
no evidence of malignancy in any of the patients.
Fifty H. pylori
isolates from 50 patients were available for E-tests (the remaining 8 isolates
could not be satisfactorily subcultured) and the results are shown in Table 1.
Resistance to clarithromycin, amoxycillin, and doxycycline was not
detected—but isolates from 10 (20%) of the patients were resistant to
metronidazole (95% confidence interval: 8.9–31.1%).
Table 1. Susceptibility to antibiotics of
H. pylori cultured from gastric biopsy
samples of patients attending the Endoscopy Unit of Dunedin Public
Hospital
ND=not
detected
For the sensitive isolates, the minimum inhibitory
concentrations (MICs) of clarithromycin, amoxycillin, and metronidazole were
well below the break points for resistance. However, the metronidazole resistant
strains were extremely resistant having MICs of >256mg/L.
DiscussionThe most significant finding of this
study was the detection of H. pylori
that were highly resistant to metronidazole in 20% of the patients. A
standardised method for assessing the susceptibility of
H. pylori to metronidazole has not been
established because this antibiotic is a pro-drug and reduction to the active
form by the bacteria is influenced by the conditions of the
test.9 Nevertheless, the high degree of
resistance suggests that the efficacy of a regimen in which metronidazole
featured would be compromised.
Using triple therapy including metronidazole, Megraud et al
found the eradication rate of H. pylori
infection was 96% when the bacteria were sensitive to the antibiotic but only
45% when they were resistant.16 Fraser et al
found a similar decrease in the eradication rate when the infecting strain was
metronidazole-resistant but noted that when clarithromycin was included in the
therapeutic regimen, metronidazole resistance had a much smaller
impact.12
The proportion of isolates resistant to metronidazole (20%)
was somewhat lower in the present study compared to other parts of the world.
Metronidazole resistance rates have been found to vary geographically with very
high rates (80-90%) being recorded in China, Zaire, and
Bangladesh.5
In a study carried out in Auckland, Fraser et al noted that
32% of H. pylori isolates were
resistant to metronidazole, and Mollison suggests the incidence is similar in
Australia.11,17 However, a multi-centre study,
carried out by Katelaris et al, on H.
pylori from Australia and New Zealand recorded a much higher incidence of
primary metronidazole resistance (56%,) but failed to distinguish between
isolates from each country.18
Factors contributing to the prevalence of
metronidazole-resistance probably include the widespread use of nitro-imidazoles
to treat gynaecological and Giardia
infections or previous treatment of H.
pylori infection with this drug, especially if the patient failed to take
the whole course.19 Antibiotic exposure exerts
a selective pressure on resistant mutants within the sensitive
H. pylori population colonising the
stomach;20 these become predominant as the
sensitive bacteria are eradicated. Giardiasis is prevalent in many parts of New
Zealand21 and, as long as metronidazole remains
the treatment of choice, it appears unlikely that resistance in
H. pylori to this drug will decrease
over time. However, this statement must be qualified in view of the recent
downward trend in metronidazole MICs in Australian isolates despite the overall
consumption of this antibiotic remaining the
same.15
In the present study, all isolates were sensitive to
amoxycillin and tetracycline and, on a worldwide basis,
H. pylori resistance to these
antibiotics seem to be infrequent.8,17
Clarithromycin resistance was also not detected in our study but the sample size
was insufficiently large to exclude it altogether. Clarithromycin is
particularly efficient in eradicating H.
pylori from the stomach as it achieves high concentration in the gastric
mucosa and becomes highly concentrated
intracellularly.19 It is of some concern that
clarithromycin resistance is being increasingly reported with rates in other
countries ranging from 10-40% and, in an Auckland based study, Fraser et al
recorded a resistance rate of 6.8%.12,17
There is no doubt that primary and acquired resistance to
clarithromycin jeopardises the success of the first-line recommended treatment
regimen. Alarcon et al noted the cure rate varied from 20–50% when
laboratory tests indicated the H.
pylori were clarithromycin resistant but 64–98% when they were
susceptible.5 Grove and Koutsouridis detected a
step-wise annual increase in the percentage of isolates resistant to
clarithromycin over a 5-year period in Australia, and attributed this to a
change in prescribing habits, notably the switch from erythromycin usage to
roxithromycin and clarithromycin.15
Cross-resistance has been demonstrated with macrolide antibiotics and some
H. pylori resistance may reflect the
use of this class of antibiotics in the
community.22
ConclusionIf non-compliance can be ruled out
as a reason for the failure of treatment regimens (including metronidazole) to
effect a cure for H. pylori infection,
then antibiotic resistance must be
considered.23 For first-line treatments
(including clarithromycin and amoxycillin), treatment failure is less likely to
be due to antibiotic resistance. Metronidazole resistance in
H. pylori is a problem in New Zealand,
and is likely to continue to be so in the foreseeable future. The possibility of
there being regional variations in the antibiotic susceptibility of
H. pylori cannot be ruled out, and any
future studies should take this into account. Further advances in molecular
techniques may enable antibiotic resistance to be detected without the need to
culture the bacteria, thus facilitating more successful treatment of infection
caused by this very common pathogen.
Author information:
Dilruba Ahmed, Postgraduate Student, Department of Microbiology, Dunedin School
of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin; Heather Brooks, Visiting Scientist,
Department of Microbiology, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago,
Dunedin; Michelle McConnell, Lecturer, Department of Microbiology, Otago School
of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin; Gil Barbezat, ‘Mary
Glendining Professor of Medicine’, Department of Medicine, Dunedin School
of Medicine; University of Otago, Dunedin
Acknowledgements:
This study was supported by a University of Otago Bequest Fund grant. The
assistance of the nursing staff of the Gastroenterology Endoscopy Unit, Dunedin
Public Hospital is also gratefully acknowledged.
Correspondence: Dr
Michelle McConnell, Department of Microbiology, Otago School of Medical
Sciences, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin. Fax: (03) 479 8540; email: michelle.mcconnell@stonebow.otago.ac.nz
References:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |