![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Better than well!At the peak of its popularity, the
viewpoint of some was that Prozac (fluoxetine) could make well people feel
“better than well”. This was a concept that not many people could
resist. Mark Epstein, a psychiatrist, was drawn to the promise of the drug. His
report was as follows.
“One evening, I decided to try a little myself. I was
well, but I could be better, I wanted to be. I soon noticed my stomach becoming
queasy and a quickening of my pulse. Maybe this was the price I would have to
pay, I thought. But that night, I did not sleep. I struggled through the next
day feeling worse than ever and resolved to put the Prozac away. Better to leave
well enough alone.”
He concludes that the selective serotonin-reuptake
inhibitors are interesting drugs, but their muting of sexuality, their tendency
to produce agitation, and their occasional association with suicidal thoughts
and behavior will forever limit their appeal. The vast number of people who take
Prozac for common unhappiness will notice nothing but side effects.
So, maybe not better than well.
N Engl J Med
2004;351:2777
Better treatment for breast cancerTamoxifen has been a marvellous
adjuvant treatment for breast cancer over the last 2 decades. But the hot
flushes, increased risk for endometrial cancer and its thromboembolic risk have
limited its use.
Recently anastrazole (an aromatase inhibitor) has been shown
in a large randomised trial (over 9000 postmenopausal women followed for 5
years) to be superior in all respects (longer disease-free survival, longer time
to relapse, and reduced distant metastases). And less limiting adverse effects.
Good news for patients.
Lancet
2005;365:60–2
Antihypertensives in older womenALLHAT, the Antihypertensive and
Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial, indicated that diuretics
were equal or superior to other antihypertensive agents as first-line therapy.
However, most patients with hypertension require more than 1 drug class to
control hypertension.
But what combination is best? In a recent study involving
over 90,000 American women aged between 50 and 79 years, some interesting data
has been reported.
After 5.6 years of follow-up, monotherapy with diuretics was
superior to monotherapy with other agents in preventing cardiovascular
complications. Combination therapy with a calcium channel blocker plus diuretic
was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular mortality than the
combination of a β-blocker plus diuretic. Risks were similar for combined
therapy with either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor plus diuretic or
a β-blocker plus diuretic.
JAMA
2004;292:2849–59
Bigger is betterThe first report on silicone breast
implants appeared in 1963. In addition to occasionally leaking, they have been
the subject of reports associating them with adverse health outcomes, including
connective tissue diseases, especially systemic sclerosis, and other autoimmune
diseases.
A recent retrospective report compares symptoms in a cohort
of women who had silicone implants and a cohort who had non-silicone involved
plastic surgery. It appears that both groups included patients with night
sweats, lethargy, breast pain, impaired mentation, reflux, paraesthesiae, hand
muscle weakness and myalgia.
The symptoms were significantly more common in the silicone
cohort. The authors concluded that silicone implant patients were not suffering
from “silicone-osis”. Really? The study was funded by Dow Corning
(who make silicone implants).
Intern Med J
2004;34:668–76
Water, water everywhere“Water is now everywhere. It
has become a modern fashion and health accessory, as ubiquitous as the mobile
phone. Students have a bottle in their bags or in front of them during lectures,
people are jogging with water, and office workers have a bottle within easy
reach of their desk.”
This is from a recent BMJ editorial. The authors go on to
point out that sales figures confirm that bottled water is the world’s
fastest selling drink. In the United Kingdom, consumers spent ₤1bn
(NZ$2.7bn) on bottled water last year, a 70-fold increase from 20 years
ago.
In the United States, consumption of bottled water has risen
from 2.5bn gallons (9.5bn litres) in 1992 to almost 6bn gallons in 2002. Water
is good for you and bottled water is very, very good for its purveyors. The
gullibility of the junior members of the human race never ceases to
amaze.
BMJ
2004;329:1417–18
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |