![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Violence against women in New Zealand
This letter is in response to two articles recently
published in the Journal (26 November
2004 issue; http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/117-1206/)
dealing with violence against women in New Zealand.
Neither of these articles deal with the cause of this
violence, which in most cases relates to events within the home. The matter is
of such serious consequence, especially to the children of the home, that every
effort should made to investigate the causes, and the possible ways in which it
may be eliminated or minimised.
I thought that the authors would welcome some kind of
dialogue in that direction, but to my surprise, apart from an initial note
acknowledging interest in the articles, there has been no reply to letters
properly addressed to Ms Janet Fanslow, Social and Community Health, University
of Auckland, who is cited as dealing with the correspondence on one of the
articles.
It is perhaps expected that a scientific publication like
the NZMJ would encourage debate on such important issues, especially if it
thought that the articles may not be soundly based.
Frank H Sims
Retired Pathologist Auckland NZMJ
note: We (including article authors)
encourage debate on articles via letters to the
editor such has yours—it is up to the
NZMJ readership to write and send these. Such debate can continue over several
issues—e.g. letters on prostate screening earlier this year.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |