![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
More on ‘Violence against women in New
Zealand’
The information in two articles of the 26 November 2004
issue of the NZMJ (Fanslow J,
Robinson E. Violence against women in New
Zealand: prevalence and health consequences plus Koziol-McLain J,
Gardiner J, Batty P, et al. Prevalence of
intimate partner violence among women presenting to an urban adult and
paediatric emergency care department;
http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/117-1206/)
was obtained by interviews of the married women, with no recorded contact or
response from the husbands involved.
The evidence is therefore highly suspect and the articles of
little value in making a significant contribution to the important problem of
domestic violence. There is no attempt to evaluate the verbal abuse and other
forms of misbehaviour for which the wives may be responsible.
The other problem is of course a very important one,
especially in relation to the children of the home. My awareness of the
existence of this work was from an article in the
New Zealand Herald giving publicity to
the investigation and its results.
It is therefore surprising to learn that Ms Janet Fanslow,
who is cited in one of the articles as dealing with correspondence, does not
respond directly but only via letters to the Editor of the
NZMJ.
Frank H Sims
Retired Pathologist Auckland |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |