![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Use it or lose itMany people regard Alzheimer disease as one of the most
dreaded consequences of aging. Most of my colleagues share this view. How can we
prevent or delay it? Keep busy? Exercise?
If regular physical exercise were shown to be effective in
reducing the risk or delaying the onset of dementing illness, it would be a
compelling reason to promote physical exercise. Researchers in Seattle studied
1740 persons older than 65 years without cognitive impairment over 6 years. They
found the incidence rate of dementia was 13.0 per 1000 person-years for
participants who exercised 3 or more times per week compared with 19.7 per 1000
person-years for those who exercised fewer than 3 times per week
(p=0.004).
Better get the running (or walking shoes) out—if you
can remember where you put them!
Ann Intern Med
2006;144:73–81
Venous thrombosis and its managementAnother high quality review of this topic appears in a
recent BMJ. It reinforces the view that
the use of low molecular weight heparin in deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary
embolism is now firmly established. Many trials and meta-analyses have confirmed
their superior efficacy, safer profile, and cost effectiveness over
unfractionated heparin. It also discusses the merits of fondaparinux which is
apparently at least as effective as heparin in the treatment of venous
thrombosis. Apparently fondaparinux is a precisely engineered pentasaccharide,
which binds antithrombin and enhances its activity toward factor Xa but is
devoid of activity against thrombin.
An interesting point is raised in the ensuing
correspondence. It seems that heparins are of porcine (pig) origin and this
might be an important issue in some religions, for example, Islam and Judaism.
Many doctors and nurses are unaware of this and therefore cannot fully inform
patients when giving advice about prophylaxis or treatment with heparin
(unfractionated or low molecular weight).
Another can of worms?
BMJ 2006;332:215–9
& 364
Transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs) are an important warning sign of strokeA TIA is defined as a sudden neurological event of vascular
cause, lasting not more than 24 h. This is a sad misuse of the language as
transient implies minutes not hours or days. Furthermore, most TIAs are over
within 15 min and few last longer than 1 h.
Does this matter? It does as TIA lasting longer than 1 hour
have a worse prognosis. Other bad prognostic features are age 60 years or over,
hypertension and unilateral weakness and dysphasia. Estimates of subsequent
stroke incidence range up to 17.3% at 3 months. So TIA need to be taken
seriously. The author of this interesting editorial speculates about what can be
done to reduce this high risk of early stroke after TIA? Beyond aspirin, and
warfarin in atrial fibrillation and surgery for carotid stenosis, few acute
interventions have the support of level I evidence.
In spite of lack of level I evidence most of us would add
statin treatment and optimise management of diabetes and hypertension.
Int Med J
2006;36:214–5
International teleradiologySeveral hundred U.S. hospitals use overseas teleradiology
services. CT head in Maine, reported in Bangalore, India—fax or phone the
results!
Indian radiologists read films while U.S. radiologists are
sleeping. What a great idea—but is it so great? The American College of
Radiology has, unsurprisingly, stated that it is “very concerned”
about overseas teleradiology, though its concern is tempered by a recognition
that the practice fills a vacuum left by its own members, who would like to
sleep at night.
Quality assurance is their main concern but the possibility
that low-wage foreign radiologists will take work from its members must also be
considered. As one U.S. radiologist wrote on a popular professional Web log,
“Who needs to pay us $350,000 a year if they can get a cheap Indian
radiologist for $25,000 a year?”
N Engl J Med
2006;354:662–3
Transplant tourismApparently Britons and other foreigners have been paying
tens of thousands of dollars for life-saving operations in China, where livers,
kidneys, hearts and lungs are harvested from executed prisoners. But accusations
that the practice is unethical have prompted the government to tighten the law.
This “service” has been running since 2001 and it appears that the
going rates are at least US$110,000 for a liver or heart transplant and $60,000
for a kidney transplant. This rather grisly tourism may prevent the recipients
queuing up for years for a transplant at home.
But soon it will end as Chinese Health Ministry guidelines
that come into effect on July 1 forbid the buying and selling of organs.
Guardian Weekly 7–13
April 2006, p7
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |