![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Would somebody please have a normal vaginal
delivery?
Having just completed the 5 weeks of Obstetrics and
Gynaecology in my Trainee Intern year, my logbook records my attendance at 10
deliveries—only 1 was a normal vaginal delivery. During my week on
delivery suite in my fifth year, I logged 15 deliveries—3 were normal
vaginal deliveries.
At an early morning caesarean section (not so many weeks
ago), the on-call anaesthetist tried to cheer me up, ‘You’ve been
reading too many history books’, he smirked, ‘babies don’t
come out the vagina any more’. I wasn’t laughing; I’d spent
the last 7 hours in and out of that delivery room waiting on twins to be born
the ‘old-fashioned’ way; the previous hour had been spent palpating
contractions and encouraging the mother to push against her epidural-addled
perineum.
My attendance at this labour was aided by the fact that, as
a high-risk pregnancy, it was supervised by the obstetrician. I got the feeling
that the independent midwife wasn’t exactly keen on the idea (of me being
present), but once she realised I was in it for the long haul, was not just in
it for the action, was knowledgeable, had a decent level of skill, and was
generally useful, she warmed to my presence.
My attempts to attend other labours were wholly
unsuccessful; the few independent midwives whom I approached said they would ask
the mothers, but that they weren’t hopeful. Maybe the families genuinely
didn’t want me to attend, maybe it was the defeatist attitude with which
the midwives approached the situation, maybe it was the way I was described
(perhaps as a ‘medical student’ who wanted to ‘watch’),
but I was never invited to a primary care delivery. Having never otherwise been
turned away by a patient, the reasons why remain a mystery.
I wish I knew why midwives are so discouraging when medical
students try to attend normal vaginal deliveries, because I’m left with
the horrible sense that the only sin I have committed is to have signed up for
the wrong profession. After all, I’m female, proactive, have good
knowledge, support minimal intervention, am staunchly pro-breastfeeding, support
‘baby-friendly’ hospitals, and am happy to fetch and carry if that
is the way I can be of most use.
Whatever the concerns of midwives, I suspect they will be
more concerned at this—having completed all of the obstetrics training I
will receive at medical school, I, a potential rural doctor, would be more
comfortable delivering a baby by caesarean than by vagina.
If midwives as a collective are worried about the
medicalisation of the natural process of pregnancy and childbirth, they should
be very concerned that a generation of doctors who have seen no other way are
about to graduate and begin filling hospitals and general practices across the
country.
Misty Curry
Trainee Intern School of Medicine University of Auckland |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |