![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The recent outbreak of plague in Auckland (part
1)
Published in NZMJ 1908;6(26):7–12 and written by J
S Purdy, District Health Officer, Auckland
Few greater calamities from a public health point of view
could befall a community than an outbreak of Bubonic Plague. Until the disease
broke out in Sydney in 1900, the possibility of New Zealand becoming infected
does not seem to have been seriously considered. With Oriental Plague raging
within three and a half days’ sail of the country, public opinion was
sufficiently aroused to justify the Government in formulating legislation to
deal with the question. It was also shown that vigorous sanitary reform was
necessary more especially with regard to the chief centres of population.
Auckland, as being the nearest port to Sydney, San
Francisco, Calcutta, and other centres of infection, naturally was looked upon
as the most likely point of entrance. During the past seven years sporadic cases
have occurred in Auckland, all strange to say, with one exception, within a
short radius of the last focus of infection, Lower Queen Street, at a short
distance from the chief wharf of the harbour.
The last outbreak—in which two young women died within
three days with symptoms clinically similar, and post mortem appearances
identical—typical cases of Bubonic Plague of the Septicaemic
type—came like a thunder-clap on the community. The fact that both
patients were employed in the same building, one occupying a position on the
floor almost immediately above the other, the finding of a rat which had died
from Plague in the same building, the grossly filthy condition of the cellars,
and the uncountable accumulation of dirt and rags under the floors of the
topmost room, combined with the regrettable mishap of the second victim dying in
the ambulance unattended, the prompt and drastic measures taken to curtail the
outbreak entailing considerable hardship on a large number of citizens, all
combined to arouse public interest to fever pitch.
The experience of all centres where Plague has broken out is
that the first great difficulty has been to convince the public that the disease
was really and truly one of Oriental Bubonic Plague. Fortunately, as far as
diagnosis was concerned, there was not a vestige of doubt in either of these
cases, the presence of the Bacillus Pestis being easily demonstrated in each of
the numerous specimens examined, combined with the cultural and biological tests
being positive. Smears of blood from the heart, spleen and kidneys all showed
the typical cocco-bacillus with bipolar staining.
A guinea pig innoculated in the first case with gland tissue
died within 50 hours, the B. Pestis being found in the blood. As in the first
case, a second guinea pig innoculated with cultures taken from the first guinea
pig died of Plague; so in the second case a guinea pig similarly innoculated
also died of Plague. I am greatly indebted to my chief (Dr. Mason), Dr. Makgill
(Government Bacteriologist) and Dr. Frost (Bacteriologist to the Auckland
Hospital) for their great assistance in completing the chain of evidence, and
confirming the diagnosis.
Both cases occurred in residents of Parnell, Dr. Ferguson
being the medical attendant in each case. That he should together with Dr.
Lindsay, who was called in consultation in the first case but arrived just after
death—have suggested Bubonic Plague as the cause of death, more especially
in the first case, shows considerable clinical acumen. The following are Dr.
Ferguson’s notes on the cases.
Continued in the next issue
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |