![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Verbal Autopsy Standards: ascertaining and
attributing cause of death
Published by World
Health Organization (Geneva), 2007. ISBN 9789241547215. Contains 117 pages.
Price US$20.00
This manual is a consensus of a 3-year effort by an expert
group of the World Health Organization (WHO) consisting of researchers,
data-users, and others of the Health Metrics Network, to obtain mortality data
from Third World regions.
A verbal autopsy is first obtained from family and
associates of the recently deceased, by using standard questions for different
age groups and types of disease. These templates are to facilitate the
classification of deaths according to the International Statistical
Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10). This
classification favours recording the underlying factors such as diabetes, war,
HIV, etc before the precipitation of death, such as infarct or bullet.
Robust mortality statistics will lead to the better
targeting of health funding towards the world’s poor from government and
private organisations, e.g. the Gates’ Foundation.
The previous lack of health data was highlighted recently in
a Lancet series of reviews The way
forward.1 Our system is based on that of
Britain, which took three centuries to hone, yet our own champion of diabetes,
Professor Don Beaven was dismayed by diabetes not being noted in half of our
autopsy reports into death from cardiovascular
disease.2 The cause of death ascertained by
clinicians with sophisticated diagnostic aids such as scans and biochemistry
tests have been shown to vary from autopsy findings in about 30% of cases
3.
I admit bias as an ageing morbid anatomist with pathological
paternalism but believe the questions may overwhelm the recently trained worker.
The lists are extremely detailed. For a field worker in New Guinea with 400
different languages, the task will be daunting.
Collation of the data involves computers for rapid
correlation but this depends on the accuracy of the data, and correlations do
not necessarily imply cause and effect.4
Despite my negative feelings as to the immensity of the
task, and that the proposed methodology is too detailed, the aim of the exercise
is all important in improving World health.
Hopefully pilot studies will test and refine the data
collection.
Robin Fraser
Pathologist Anatomical Pathology Canterbury Health Christchurch References:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |