Table of contents
Current issue
Search journal
Archived issues
NZMJ Obituaries
Hotline (free ads)
How to subscribe
How to contribute
How to advertise
Contact Us
Other journals
The New Zealand Medical Journal

 Journal of the New Zealand Medical Association, 27-February-2009, Vol 122 No 1290

New Zealand’s venomous creatures
Robin J Slaughter, D Michael G Beasley, Bruce S Lambie, Leo J Schep
Aim New Zealand is home to a small number of venomous creatures. The purpose of this review is to educate and update healthcare professionals on the management of envenoming from these creatures.
Methods An extensive literature review was performed by systematically searching OVID MEDLINE and ISI Web of Science. In addition, further information was obtained from book chapters, relevant news reports, and web material.
Results The signs and symptoms resulting from envenoming of clinically significant venomous creatures found in New Zealand are discussed. Definitive medical treatment recommendations are made.
Conclusion Encounters with New Zealand’s few venomous creatures, while rarely fatal, can cause significant morbidity. Effective management can be achieved by informed health professionals having regard to the principles outlined in this review.

New Zealand is host to a small but varied group of terrestrial and marine venomous creatures. They range from species which cause only minor injuries, such as bluebottle jellyfish (Physalia utriculus), to creatures which can cause significant systemic envenoming, such as the yellow bellied sea snake (Pelamis platurus). Although envenoming caused by these animals is relatively rare, there are still a sufficient number of cases each year in New Zealand to warrant a broad review and update of current recommendations for management.
In this article we will examine New Zealand’s venomous creatures, including their habitats and distribution, the clinical effects of envenoming, and appropriate first aid and definitive medical treatment.

Katipo and Redback spiders

Description—There are five medically significant genera of spider in the world (Atrax, Hadronyche, Latrodectus, Loxosceles, and Phoneutria). New Zealand has two venomous spiders from the genus Latrodectus: the endangered native katipo (Latrodectus katipo) and an Australian import, the redback spider (Latrodectus hasseltii). Another spider, the “black katipo”, was once thought to be a separate species (Latrodectus atritus) but has been found to be a junior synonym of L. katipo.1 Katipo is a Māori name and means “night stinger”; it is derived from two words, kakati (to sting), and po (the night).2
L. katipo is found throughout coastal regions of New Zealand, including most of the North Island, and south to Greymouth on the west coast and Dunedin on the east coast of the South Island.3,4 Katipo spiders have a highly specialised habitat and are only found near the shoreline amongst sand dunes.4 Redback spiders were first found in the early 1980s in Wanaka and have spread further afield since then.4
Figure 1. Latrodectus katipo –Katipo spider
Figure 2. Latrodectus hasseltii –Redback spider
The katipo and redback are similar in appearance, both being dark brown to black in colour, with an orange to red jagged stripe running down the length of the dorsal abdomen (Figure 1). Katipo spiders are slightly smaller than redback spiders (~10 mm body length) (Figure 2).
Both spiders have a red hourglass marking on the lower surface, a common trait in many Latrodectus spiders. Female katipo found north of 39°15'S (L. katipo var. atritus) almost always lack the red stripe on the dorsal abdomen.1,4
There are very few reported cases of katipo or redback bites in New Zealand. Historically, there is some evidence of occasional significant symptoms from katipo bites.2 Black katipo bites have not been considered particularly dangerous, although a suspected case from Te Kopuru with mild to moderate symptoms has been reported.2
Bites from these spiders are not common, as by nature they are shy, non-aggressive animals. Additionally, the narrow habitat of the katipo and diminishing population means interaction between humans and the spider is typically minimal. Accidentally disturbing a web or antagonising a spider will likely result in the spider biting in self defence. If the female spider is protecting an egg sac it may act more aggressively.2
Signs and symptoms—Bites produce a syndrome known as latrodectism, which is characterised principally by pain. There may initially be minimal effects associated with the instant of the bite before local redness, diaphoresis, and pain develop. Pain often increases in severity and spreads proximally.5,6
Abdominal, back, or chest pain can occur. Non-specific systemic symptoms may develop, including nausea, vomiting, generalised diaphoresis, headache, lethargy, malaise and hypertension; less commonly other neurologic and autonomic symptoms may occur.5,6
Treatment—To help minimise systemic venom spread, victims should be reassured and persuaded to remain still. The application of a cold pack may help relieve local pain.
All bites should be medically observed in a hospital for at least 6 hours to detect any onset of symptoms.7 Patients can initially be treated with opioid analgesia and benzodiazepines.8,9 If pain is refractory to initial treatment, or if significant signs and symptoms of latrodectism occur, redback antivenom can be considered.
Current limited evidence on safety and efficacy would support antivenom use in cases of latrodectism causing either systemic effects or severe or persistent pain.8 It is likely to be effective for both redback and katipo spider bites.10 Adverse reactions to this antivenom are relatively uncommon11; early anaphylactoid reactions have been reported as occurring in 0.5 to 0.8% of patients, while less than 5% develop serum sickness.12 Severe anaphylaxis or death has not been reported.

White tailed spider

Description—The white tailed spider (Lampona cylindrata and L. murina) is an Australian native which arrived in New Zealand in the late 19th Century.13 Often found both inside and outside the home, it hides during the day in small crevices in walls, crawl spaces, shoes, bed linen, and under clothes or items left on the floor.7 This spider is distinctive with a dark grey to black cylindrical body, and is readily identifiable by a small white patch at the end of the abdomen, above the spinnerets. It is between 12 and 17 mm long (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Lampona cylindrata – White tailed spider
In New Zealand the white tailed spider has only become a medical concern in the last 15 to 20 years where it has been linked to necrotising arachnidism.
This concern has been due, in part, to media attention and medical reports in both New Zealand and Australia, suggesting bites may cause necrotic ulcers.14–17
However, a recent study has demonstrated that there is no link between white tailed spider bites and tissue necrosis.18
A prospective cohort study of 130 cases with confirmed bites was conducted. Patients were included only if there was a clear history of a bite, and the spider was caught at the time of the bite and later identified by an expert arachnologist. None of the 130 cases developed necrotic ulcers. Indeed, the only spiders proven to cause necrotising arachnidism belong to the genus Loxosceles, such as the North American brown recluse spider,19 and are not found in New Zealand.
Signs and symptoms—The bite from a white tailed spider may cause local symptoms of pain, redness, swelling, and pruritus.18 Less commonly minor systemic symptoms of nausea, vomiting, malaise, and headache can also be seen. All these symptoms are generally mild and self-limiting.18 As with any puncture wound, there is a risk of secondary infection.
Treatment—First aid consists of ensuring the wound is cleaned, along with application of an ice pack to reduce pain and swelling.
Further treatment is seldom required but may include simple analgesia and/or antihistamines for symptomatic relief. Patients presenting with a lesion thought to be associated with a spider should be thoroughly investigated for another cause.20 A good history and physical examination should be undertaken.
For severe or persistent necrotic lesions, microbiological investigation should be performed, including cultures for organisms such as fungi and unusual bacteria.21 Alternative diagnoses to spider bite should be considered, as a wide array of conditions have been misdiagnosed as necrotic arachnidism; these include sporotrichosis,22 Pyoderma gangrenosum,23 Mycobacterium ulcerans,24 and even chemical burns.25


Description—Of the numerous jellyfish within New Zealand’s coastal waters, only two species (within the same genus) are considered medically important: the Bluebottle jellyfish (Physalia utriculus) and the Pacific or Portuguese Man-of-War jellyfish (Physalia physalis). The two jellyfish species most dangerous to humans,26 the box jellyfish (Chironex fleckeri) and irukandji jellyfish (Carukia barnesi), are not found in New Zealand.
Bluebottles have a distinctive bright blue floating bladder, measuring about 2–15 cm long, and one main deep blue fishing tentacle which may be up to 10 m in length.27 (Figure 4)
The Pacific or Portuguese Man-of-War is a larger form of the bluebottle; its floating bladder may be up to 25 cm long, and it has up to five main tentacles.28 (Figure 5)
Figure 4. Physalia utriculus – Bluebottle jellyfish
Figure 5. Physalia physalis – Portuguese Man-of-War
All jellyfish possess microscopic stinging cells called nematocysts. These structures are numerous on the tentacles or body of the animal, and are used to capture prey. A small dose of venom contained within each nematocyst is discharged in response to chemical or mechanical stimulation.29 Nematocysts from many jellyfish do not penetrate human skin and/or their venom is not toxic to humans; encounters with these therefore do not produce a significant reaction. However, Physalia nematocysts do penetrate human skin, and envenoming may lead to systemic effects.
Signs and symptoms—Most victims of Physalia envenoming will display no signs and symptoms other than localised pain and pruritus. Characteristically, stings cause a linear collection of elliptical blanched weals, with a surrounding red flare (resembling a "string of beads").30
Extensive stinging (more likely from larger specimens) may lead to systemic symptoms including nausea, vomiting, headache, chills, drowsiness, breathing difficulties, cardiovascular collapse, or death;31,32 however, systemic symptoms are rare.33 Mild localised hypersensitivity reactions can occur (e.g. rash, urticaria, itching), but anaphylaxis is uncommon.34
Treatment—Initially the victim should be prevented from rubbing the area or performing vigorous muscular activity, as this will lead to greater discharge of attached nematocysts and venom movement into the general circulation.35
On-site first aid consists of flushing the affected area with sea water to help remove any adherent tentacles;28 careful removal of tentacles with forceps may be required.
Vinegar, which is used successfully to treat box jellyfish stings in north Australia,28 is contraindicated in New Zealand as it causes additional discharge of Physalia nematocysts, leading to a greater envenoming.36 Fresh water may also cause a discharge of nematocysts to a lesser extent, but it is acceptable to initially flush the area with fresh water if sea water is not available.
Traditionally, ice or cold packs were recommended for pain relief following Physalia stings;37 however, a recent randomised controlled trial has shown significant benefit of hot water over cold packs.33 Hot water immersion or showers should now be considered the treatment of choice for Physalia envenoming. The technique as described (below) for fish stings should be followed, or alternatively a hot shower may be all that is required to alleviate pain.
Further treatment consists of ensuring adequate pain relief with topical anaesthesia and simple analgesics (e.g. paracetamol), or parenteral administration of an opioid in severe cases. Infection, hypersensitivity reactions, or systemic symptoms are rare complications; monitoring and supportive care should be undertaken if required. There is no antivenom available for Physalia stings.


Description—Stingrays are found throughout New Zealand’s coastal waters, generally in shallow intertidal areas such as sheltered bays, river mouths, and other sandy regions.38 They are cartilaginous fish with a characteristic round, flattened body, and a thin tail (Figure 6). The tail contains at least one serrated spine on the dorsal surface; each spine has two ventrolateral glandular grooves containing the venom glands surrounded by the epidermis.38,39
Stingrays are not belligerent and do not attack humans if unprovoked. The majority of stingray injuries are to the lower limbs and usually occur when swimmers or divers accidentally step on them. Injuries can also occur when fishermen find stingrays in their nets or on their lines.40
Figure 6. Dasyatis brevicaudata –
Short-tail stingray
Signs and symptoms—The most significant concerns following a stingray strike are the risk of traumatic injury, envenoming, and bacterial wound contamination.41,42 Such strikes may cause lacerations or puncture wounds, which may involve direct injury to tendons, muscles, nerves, blood vessels or internal organs.39 Associated envenoming may cause intense local pain, oedema, and muscle cramps; local blistering or necrosis can also occur and may be extensive.40,41 Serious injury or death, though rare, has occurred due to exsanguination or direct trauma to vital organs (venom may contribute to the internal organ damage from such injuries), and from complications such as septicaemia or tetanus infection.41,43–45 Systemic symptoms, though uncommon, may include nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, hypotension, syncope, salivation, tremor—and in rare cases convulsions, arrhythmias, or circulatory collapse.46
Treatment—First aid consists of flushing the affected area with fresh water (sea water will suffice if fresh water is unavailable). Flushing assists in the removal of venom and barb fragments. Any haemorrhage must be controlled with local pressure. Stingray venom is heat labile,47 and much pain relief can therefore be achieved through the application of heat to the wound.42 Hot water immersion can be of considerable benefit and should be trialled at an optimum temperature of around 45°C for 15 to 20 minutes, taking care not to cause a thermal burn.48 The water temperature should be checked before immersion to ensure water temperature is bearable without injury.
If pain subsides, immersion should continue for up to 2 hours. Ensure the water remains at around 45°C. However, if pain relief is not achieved in the first 15 to 20 minutes, the procedure should be abandoned.
Early exploration and debridement of the wound is essential in all cases. All patients should be transported to a hospital as soon as practical for definitive wound management. Secondary infection is a significant cause of morbidity.41,49
All foreign matter, including retained sting fragments and any non-viable tissues, must be removed.50 Local anaesthesia or a regional nerve block should be used, but avoid adrenaline as this delays microvascular clearance of venom, thereby aggravating necrosis.46 Deep wounds may require debridement under general anaesthesia. Spines are usually radiopaque, and X-ray examination should be used to ensure removal of all fragments. Ultrasound may be required if there are still doubts regarding retained spines.39 Following debridement, the area should be thoroughly cleaned and left open to granulate and heal by secondary intention.41
Infiltration of the wound area with local anaesthetic may be required in the event of severe pain.41 Regional nerve block and/or parenteral opioids may also be required.51 There is no specific antivenom available. Supportive care should be undertaken for any systemic symptoms.
Stingray strikes may introduce a range of marine bacteria into a wound, or the spine may break and contaminate the site. Sequelae to these events include ulceration, infection, necrotizing fasciitis, and osteomyelitis.41,49 Broad-spectrum prophylactic antibiotics are not necessary for all wounds.42 However, they are indicated where there is considerable foreign material present, if there is a delay of 6 hours or more in wound debridement, or if the wound is deep.41,42
If infection is evident, then a broad spectrum parenteral antibiotic regimen is advised.52 Subsequent culture results should be used to determine the best antibiotic for continued management (specify seawater involvement when submitting a swab or specimens for microbiological analysis).53 Ensure tetanus prophylaxis is up to date following any stingray wound. All patients require medical review within 1 to 2 days, to detect any early evidence of wound necrosis or infection.41

Other venomous marine punctures

Description—New Zealand’s coastal waters are host to a range of venomous fish and sea urchins. Most of these fish are classified within the Scorpaenidae family (scorpion fish) (Figure 7) and come in a wide variety of sizes, shapes, and colours.
Apart from stingrays, further common venomous fish in New Zealand include spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) (Figure 8) and elephant fish (Callorhinchus milii) (Figure 9), plus the brown bullhead catfish (Ameiurus nebulosus)—an introduced freshwater catfish (Figure 10).
These venomous fish have external spines, which, depending on the species, may be located on a variety of positions on the fish including the dorsal (common), pectoral, shoulder, pelvic, opercular, anal, and caudal regions.
The different fish venoms have not been studied extensively, but are considered to be heat labile and all produce a similar toxic course.47
Figure 7. Scorpaena papillosus – Scorpion fish
Figure 8. Squalus acanthias – Spiny dogfish
Figure 9. Callorhinchus milii – Elephant fish
Figure 10. Ameiurus nebulosus – Brown bullhead catfish
Puncture wounds can also be caused by a variety of sea urchins, including kina (Evechinus chloroticus) (Figure 11) which are grouped within the Echinodermata phylum. Sea urchins have two venom apparatus: external spines and pedicellariae (small grasping organ that is covered by venom-producing glandular tissue).54 Injuries typically occur to the feet or hands after victims step on or handle fish or sea urchins.55–57
Figure 11. Evechinus chloroticus – Kina
Signs and symptoms—Symptoms are generally restricted to severe local pain, which can spread to the whole of the affected limb.56,58,59 Mild, non-specific systemic effects can also occur (including nausea, diaphoresis, and hypotension).55,60 Systemic symptoms are thought to be the result of circulating venom.61 In rare instances, sea urchin stings induce a delayed type hypersensitivity reaction. Clinical effects include local pruritus and erythema—along with vesicular eruptions, paraesthesia, malaise, and myalgia.62,63
Treatment—Initial first aid consists of flushing the affected area with fresh water, control of any haemorrhage, and hot water immersion (as outlined for stingray stings). While it is unusual for fish spines to break off, spines of sea urchins can commonly fracture and remain lodged in the wound. Protruding sea urchin spines can be removed using forceps. Fish and sea urchin spines are typically radiopaque and an X-ray or ultrasound can help identify any difficult-to-remove foreign material. If there is evidence of retained fragments, surgical exploration and debridement must be undertaken.
It is especially important for sea urchin stings that all foreign material is removed, as long-term lesions—such as chronic granulomas of various aetiologies and histologies (including sarcoidal)—can occur.64,65 These granulomas are sometimes accompanied by fibrosis, necrosis, or microabscesses. Some represent non-specific foreign body inflammatory reactions, and others are considered delayed type hypersensitivity reactions to an unknown antigen.65
Further treatment of fish and sea urchin injuries includes adequate pain relief, control of infection, tetanus prophylaxis, and (if required) supportive care for any systemic symptoms.

Sea Snake

Description—Sea snakes are a diverse group of front-fanged venomous snakes that belong to the Elapidae family. They vary in both size and colour, with most species growing to 1.2 to 1.5 m in length (Figure 12). Sea snakes are distributed mainly in warm tropical waters of the Indian and Pacific Oceans, with the majority found either close to the shore or around coral reefs.
Figure 12. Laticauda colubrina – Banded sea krait
One pelagic species, the yellow bellied sea snake (Pelamis platurus), is widely distributed from the east coast of Africa across the Indian and Pacific Oceans, south to New Zealand and across to the western coast of the Americas.66 Another species, the banded or yellow-lipped sea krait (Laticauda colubrina), has a wide distribution throughout the Pacific.
These two snakes are not common in New Zealand’s coastal waters, but they may occasionally beach themselves around the northern coast of New Zealand.67 It is estimated that only about a handful of these snakes wash up each year.68 Worldwide sea snake bites are encountered very infrequently and, to our knowledge, no cases of envenoming have been reported in New Zealand. Even so, there is a risk that envenoming could occur if a beached specimen is handled.
Signs and symptoms—All species of sea snake possess similar venom and therefore cause similar signs and symptoms; several attributable to myotoxins. Although it is estimated that 80% of bites result in no or trivial envenoming, there is the risk of severe and life-threatening effects occurring following bites.69 If envenoming does occur, there is often an asymptomatic time interval, ranging from one to several hours, before the onset of systemic symptoms.
Systemic toxicity is usually heralded by myolysis; patients typically develop significant muscle aches and pain, sometimes in association with weakness. Associated myoglobinuria may lead to renal effects including acute renal failure. Patients can also develop a flaccid paralysis with ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, and depressed or absent deep tendon reflexes. This may progress to more severe paralysis leading to full respiratory arrest.66,69,70
Treatment—Following envenoming, appropriate first aid consists of applying a pressure immobilisation bandage as early as possible to retard venom transport via the lymphatic system.71
Pressure immobilisation, particularly the immobilisation, appears to be the most effective method to minimise the systemic spread of snake venom.72 It consists of applying a broad compression bandage over the bitten area (as firmly as that used for a sprained ankle) followed by a second firm bandage applied from the tip of the limb heading proximally toward the body to cover as much of the limb as possible. A splint or sling should then be used to immobilise the affected region. The patient should remain completely immobilised for transport to hospital.73
If there is evidence of systemic envenoming, definitive treatment consists of administering antivenom. CSL Polyvalent Snake Antivenom is suitable and this resource is available from the Auckland Hospital Pharmacy. Supportive care of an envenomed patient is probably necessary; this can include management of myolysis, paralysis, and their complications.
IV fluids to help maintain urine output are required should myolysis become evident, and urinary alkalinisation may also be helpful. However, any developing renal failure or hyperkalemia may mandate haemodialysis. Atropine and neostigmine may provide short-term reversal of respiratory paralysis.74 In the event of respiratory compromise, early consideration for intubation and artificial ventilation is recommended. Following appropriate treatment the prognosis is good.


New Zealand has a very small number of venomous creatures, and mortality from envenoming is low. In some circumstances, however, there is the potential for prolonged morbidity if appropriate treatment is not initiated. Because these cases of envenoming are uncommon, this review has been written to assist the healthcare provider to identify the species in cases of likely envenoming, and provide the appropriate first aid and definitive treatment to ensure a satisfactory outcome for the patient.
Serum antibodies that specifically bind to and thereby neutralise venom
Species within the subphylum Chelicerata (joint-legged invertebrate animals) that include spiders and scorpions
Poisoning resulting from the bite or sting of an arachnid
The injection of sufficient venom into animals, including humans, to cause clinical symptoms
The clinical syndrome caused by the venom of Latrodectus spp. spiders.
Specialised stinging cells found on animals in the phylum Cnidaria
A sea urchin’s small grasping organ that is covered by venom producing glandular tissue
Competing interests: None known.
Author information: Robin J Slaughter, Poison Information Officer; New Zealand National Poisons Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin; D Michael G Beasley, Medical Toxicologist, New Zealand National Poisons Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin; Bruce S Lambie, Emergency Physician, Dunedin Hospital, Dunedin;
Leo J Schep, Poison Information Specialist, New Zealand National Poisons Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin
Acknowledgements: We thank Dr John Fountain (New Zealand National Poison Centre) for his helpful suggestions; Justine Schep for copyediting the manuscript; Dr Phil Bishop and Ken Miller (Department of Zoology, University of Otago) and Mike Barker (Department of Marine Science, University of Otago) for assistance with the photographs. We also wish to acknowledge contributions of photographs and the helpful suggestions of Malcolm Francis from the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd.
Correspondence: Robin J Slaughter; New Zealand National Poisons Centre, University of Otago, P. O. Box 913. Dunedin, New Zealand. Fax: +64 (0)3 4770509; email:
  1. Vink CJ, Sirvid PJ, Malumbres-Olarte J, et al. Species status and conservation issues of New Zealand’s endemic Latrodectus spider species (Araneae : Theridiidae). Invertebr Syst. 2008;22:589–604.
  2. Hornabrook RW. Studies in preventive hygiene from the Otago Medical School: the katipo spider. N Z Med J. 1951;50:131–8.
  3. McCutcheon ER. Distribution of the Katipo spiders (Araneae: Theridiidae) of New Zealand. NZ Entomol. 1976;6:204.
  4. Forster R, Forster L. Spiders of New Zealand and their worldwide kin. Dunedin: University of Otago Press; 1999, p173–9.
  5. Isbister GK, Gray MR. Latrodectism: a prospective cohort study of bites by formally identified redback spiders. Med J Aust. 2003;179:88–91.
  6. Sutherland SK, Trinca JC. Survey of 2144 cases of red-back spider bites: Australia and New Zealand, 1963--1976. Med J Aust. 1978;2:620–3.
  7. White J, Cardoso LJ. Clinical toxicology of spider bites. In: Meier J, White J, editors. Handbook of clinical toxicology of animal venoms and poisons, Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1995, p259–329.
  8. Vetter RS, Isbister GK. Medical aspects of spider bites. Annu Rev Entomol. 2008;53:409–29.
  9. Clark RF, Wethern-Kestner S, Vance MV, et al. Clinical presentation and treatment of black widow spider envenomation: a review of 163 cases. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:782–7.
  10. Graudins A, Padula M, Broady K, et al. Red-back spider (Latrodectus hasselti) antivenom prevents the toxicity of widow spider venoms. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37:154–60.
  11. White J. CSL antivenom handbook. Melbourne: CSL Ltd; 2001, p52–4.
  12. Isbister GK, Graudins A, White J, et al. Antivenom treatment in arachnidism. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2003;41:291–300.
  13. Platnick NI. A relimitation and revision of the Australasian ground spider family Lamponidae (Araneae: Gnaphosoidea). Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 2000;245:1–328.
  14. Spring WJ. A probable case of necrotizing arachnidism. Med J Aust. 1987;147:605–7.
  15. Gray M. A significant illness that was produced by the white-tailed spider, Lampona cylindrata. Med J Aust. 1989;150:401–3.
  16. St George I, Forster L. Skin necrosis after white-tailed spider bite? N Z Med J. 1991;104:207–8.
  17. Skinner MW, Butler CS. Necrotising arachnidism treated with hyperbaric oxygen. Med J Aust. 1995;162:372–3.
  18. Isbister GK, Gray MR. White-tail spider bite: a prospective study of 130 definite bites by Lampona species. Med J Aust. 2003;179:180–1.
  19. Swanson DL, Vetter RS. Bites of brown recluse spiders and suspected necrotic arachnidism. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:700–7.
  20. Isbister GK. Necrotic arachnidism: the mythology of a modern plague. Lancet. 2004;364:549–53.
  21. Isbister GK. Spider mythology across the world. West J Med. 2001;175:86–7.
  22. Moaven LD, Altman SA, Newham AR. Sporotrichosis mimicking necrotising arachnidism. Med J Aust. 1999;171:685–6.
  23. Weenig RH, Davis MD, Dahl PR, et al. Skin ulcers misdiagnosed as pyoderma gangrenosum. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1412–8.
  24. Hayman JA, Smith IM. Necrotising arachnidism in Australia. Med J Aust. 1991;155:351.
  25. Vetter RS, Bush SP. Chemical burn misdiagnosed as brown recluse spider bite. Am J Emerg Med. 2002;20:68–9.
  26. O'Reilly GM, Isbister GK, Lawrie PM, et al. Prospective study of jellyfish stings from tropical Australia, including the major box jellyfish Chironex fleckeri. Med J Aust. 2001;175:652–5.
  27. Nimorakiotakis B, Winkel KD. Marine envenomations. Part 1--Jellyfish. Aust Fam Physician. 2003;32:969–74.
  28. Fenner PJ, Williamson JA, Burnett JW, et al. First aid treatment of jellyfish stings in Australia. Response to a newly differentiated species. Med J Aust. 1993;158:498–501.
  29. Williamson J, Burnett J. Clinical toxicology of marine coelenterate injuries. In: Meier J, White J, editors. Handbook of clinical toxicology of animal venoms and poisons. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1995, p89–115.
  30. Hawdon GM, Winkel KD. Venomous marine creatures. Aust Fam Physician. 1997;26:1369–74.
  31. Burnett JW, Gable WD. A fatal jellyfish envenomation by the Portuguese man-o'war. Toxicon. 1989;27:823–4.
  32. Stein MR, Marraccini JV, Rothschild NE, et al. Fatal Portuguese man-o'-war (Physalia physalis) envenomation. Ann Emerg Med. 1989;18:312–5.
  33. Loten C, Stokes B, Worsley D, et al. A randomised controlled trial of hot water (45 degrees C) immersion versus ice packs for pain relief in bluebottle stings. Med J Aust. 2006;184:329–33.
  34. Auerbach PS. Marine envenomations. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:486–93.
  35. Lumley J, Williamson JA, Fenner PJ, et al. Fatal envenomation by Chironex fleckeri, the north Australian box jellyfish: the continuing search for lethal mechanisms. Med J Aust. 1988;148:527–34.
  36. Exton DR. Treatment of Physalia physalis envenomation. Med J Aust. 1988;149:54.
  37. Exton DR, Fenner PJ, Williamson JA. Cold packs: effective topical analgesia in the treatment of painful stings by Physalia and other jellyfish. Med J Aust. 1989;151
  38. Halstead BW. Poisonous and venomous marine animals, vol 3. Washington (DC): United States Government Printing Office; 1965, p13–91.
  39. Acott C, Meier J. Clinical toxicology of venomous stingray injuries. In: Meier J, White J, editors. Handbook of clinical toxicology of animal venoms and poisons. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1995, p135–40.
  40. Barss P. Wound necrosis caused by the venom of stingrays. Pathological findings and surgical management. Med J Aust. (1984);141:85–855.
  41. Fenner PJ, Williamson JA, Skinner RA. Fatal and non-fatal stingray envenomation. Med J Aust. 1989;151:621–5.
  42. Isbister GK. Venomous fish stings in tropical northern Australia. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;19:561–5.
  43. Wright-Smith RJ. A case of fatal stabbing by a stingray. Med J Aust. 1945;2:466–7.
  44. Liggins JB. An unusual bathing fatality. N Z Med J. 1939;203:27–9.
  45. Collins G. Steve Irwin, wildlife master, is killed by a stingray at 44. New York Times. New York, September 5, 2006.
  46. Weiss BF, Wolfenden HD. Survivor of a stingray injury to the heart. Med J Aust. 2001;175:33–4.
  47. Church JE, Hodgson WC. The pharmacological activity of fish venoms. Toxicon. 2002;40:1083–109.
  48. Vijayasekaran VS. Stingray envenomation or iatrogenic thermal burn. ANZ J Surg. 2001;71:323–5.
  49. Barber GR, Swygert JS. Necrotizing fasciitis due to Photobacterium damsela in a man lashed by a stingray. N Engl J Med. 2000;324:824.
  50. Flint DJ, Sugrue WJ. Stingray injuries: a lesson in debridement. N Z Med J. 1999;112:137–8.
  51. Dormon FM. Local nerve block after stingray injury. Lancet. 1985;16:1131–2.
  52. Ashdown L, Callanan V. Marine wound infections. In: Williamson JA, Fenner PJ, Burnett JW, Rifkin JF, editors. Venomous and poisonous marine animals. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press; 1996, p88–97.
  53. Lehane L, Rawlin GT. Topically acquired bacterial zoonoses from fish: a review. Med J Aust. 2000;173:256–9.
  54. Mebs D. Clinical toxicology of sea urchin and starfish injuries. In: Meier J, White J, editors. Handbook of clinical toxicology of animal venoms and poisons. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1995, p129–33.
  55. Aldred B, Erickson T, Lipscomb J. Lionfish envenomations in an urban wilderness. Wilderness Environ Med. 1996;7:291–6.
  56. Kizer KW, McKinney HE, Auerbach PS. Scorpaenidae envenomation. A five-year poison center experience. JAMA. 1985;253:807–10.
  57. Trestrail JH, al-Mahasneh QM. Lionfish string experiences of an inland poison center: a retrospective study of 23 cases. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1989;31:173–5.
  58. Garyfallou GT, Madden JF. Lionfish envenomation. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28:456–7.
  59. Vetrano SJ, Lebowitz JB, Marcus S. Lionfish envenomation. J Emerg Med. 2002;23:379–82.
  60. Wu ML, Chou SL, Huang TY, et al. Sea-urchin envenomation. Vet Hum Toxicol. 2003;45:307–9.
  61. Haddad V, Martins IA, Makyama HM. Injuries caused by scorpionfishes (Scorpaena plumieri Bloch, 1789 and Scorpaena brasiliensis Cuvier 1829) in the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean (Brazilian coast): epidemiologic, clinic and therapeutic aspects of 23 stings in humans. Toxicon. 2003;42:79–83.
  62. Burke WA, Steinbaugh JR, O'Keefe EJ. Delayed hypersensitivity reaction following a sea urchin sting. Int J Dermatol. 1986;25:649–50.
  63. Kane HE. Clinical curio: hypersensitivity after a sea urchin sting. Br Med J. 1982;282:950.
  64. Cracchiolo Ar, Goldberg L. Local and systemic reactions to puncture injuries by the sea urchin spine and the date palm thorn. Arthritis Rheum. 1977;20:1206–12.
  65. De La Torre C, Toribio J. Sea-urchin granuloma: histologic profile. A pathologic study of 50 biopsies. J Cutan Pathol. 2001;28:223–8.
  66. Reid HA. Sea-snake bites. Br Med J. 1956;2:73–8.
  67. Gill BJ. Records of turtles and sea snakes in New Zealand, 1837-1996. NZJ Marine Freshwater Res. 1997;31:477–86.
  68. Tahana Y. Rest and recreation for venomous visitor. New Zealand Herald. Auckland, April 25, 2008.
  69. White J. Clinical toxicology of sea snakebites. In: Meier J, White J, editors, Handbook of clinical toxicology of animal venoms and poisons. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1995, p159–170.
  70. Marsden AT, Reid HA. Pathology of sea-snake poisoning. Br Med J. 1961;1:1290–3.
  71. Sutherland SK, Coulter AR, Harris RD. Rationalization of 1st-aid measures for Elapid snakebite. Lancet. 1979;1:183–6.
  72. Currie BJ. Treatment of snakebite in Australia: The current evidence base and questions requiring collaborative multicentre prospective studies. Toxicon. 2006;48:941–56.
  73. White J. Clinical toxicology of snakebite in Australia and New Guinea. In: Meier J, White J, editors. Handbook of clinical toxicology of animal venoms and poisons. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1995, p595–617.
  74. Little M, Pereira P. Successful treatment of presumed death-adder neurotoxicity using anticholinesterases. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2000;12:241–5.
Current issue | Search journal | Archived issues | Classifieds | Hotline (free ads)
Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals