![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selenium was first identified by Jons Jakob Berzelius in
1817.1 In the early 20th Century, selenium
became known for its toxic effect on livestock which was called the “blind
staggers”.1 Later in the 20th Century
selenium was recognised as an essential trace mineral after the discovery of its
roles in glutathione peroxidase, Keshan disease and Kashin-Beck
disease.2 In the last 10 years, there has been
intense interest in selenium supplementation and its role in health.
Selenium biochemistry and metabolism are complex and have
been extensively reviewed elsewhere.3,4
Selenium is absorbed as selenoamino acids - L-selenomethionine (SeMet),
L-selenocysteine (Sec), and Se-methylselenocysteine and then
incorporated into proteins by two different pathways. The main pathway involves
L-selenocysteine which is inserted into proteins in specific positions, forming
specific selenoproteins.3 25 selenoproteins
exist in human, including glutathione peroxidases (GPx-1,
GPx-2, GPx-3, GPx-4, GPx-6), iodothyronine deiodinases (DIO 1-3) and thioredoxin
reductases (TrxR1, TrxR2, TGR).
Selenium and the eyeSelenium and
cataractogenesis—Cataract formation can be induced in mice within
3 to 5 days with a single subcutaneous injection of 30 mol/kg selenium as sodium
selenite.5 Conversely GPx-1 has been identified
in the lens, and cataract formation has been observed in GPx-1 knockout
mice.4
Given that GPx-1 level declines rapidly with selenium
deprivation, this suggests that selenium deficiency may contribute to cataract
development. Further evidence comes from selenium-deprived rats where a decrease
in GPx-1 activity in the rat lens and early lens morphological changes were
noted.6 However, there are no convincing human
studies (three case-control studies showing contradicting results) linking serum
selenium level with cataract
formation.7–9
There are three randomised controlled trials addressing
antioxidant supplementation, with selenium as one of the ingredients, on
cataract formation. In the largest study in 2008, 1020 participants with early
or no cataract were observed for 9 years.10 The
study found that a daily intake of Centrum, a multivitamin and mineral tablet
containing 25 microgram of selenium, led to a decreased incidence of total lens
opacity (hazard ratio 0.82, P = 0.03) and nuclear opacity (hazard ratio 0.66,
p=0.004) compared to placebo, but a higher rate of posterior subcapsular
cataract (hazard ratio 2.00, p<0.001) was noted. However, there was no
statistically significant reduction on moderate visual acuity loss or cataract
surgery in the treatment group.
In the other randomised controlled trials, one showed no
benefit on cataract formation when selenium was given with alpha-tocopherol and
beta carotene in Chinese subjects likely to be deficient in selenium and other
micronutrients.11 In the third randomised
controlled trial, when selenium was given as a wider package (β-carotene,
vitamin E, vitamin C, citrus bioflavonoid complex, quercitin, biberry extract,
rutin, zinc picolinate, selenium, taurine, n-acetyl cysteine, l-glutathione,
vitamin B2, and chromium), there was an increase in cortical cataract in the
right eye (p=0.04).12
It is important to note that selenium was included with a
large number of other micronutrients in these randomised controlled trials, thus
it is very difficult to draw conclusions on the real effect of selenium
supplementation on cataractogenesis. However, it is biologically plausible that
selenium supplementation in selenium deprived individuals can prevent the
formation of cataract by optimizing GPx-1 activity in the lens.
Selenium and glaucoma—The association
between selenium and glaucoma is complex and not well-understood. In the
Nutritional Prevention of Cancer (NPC) trial, a randomised controlled study
performed in 1996 involving 1312 patients on selenium supplementation and
non-melanoma skin cancer, 200 mcg of selenium supplementation daily was linked
to the development of glaucoma (hazard ratio 1.78, 95%CI
1.12–2.82).13,14 The risk was even higher
in those who chose to continue selenium supplementation after the trial (hazard
ratio 10.13, 95%CI 1.32–77.62).13,14
Two studies have been published on the effect of selenium on
human trabecular meshwork cells to provide a biological basis for the above
observation.14,15 These showed that in cell
culture, treatment of human trabecular meshwork cells with selenium leads to a
number of biochemical changes which may result in an increase in trabecular
outflow resistance.
In the latest case-control study involving 47 patients with
primary open angle glaucoma and 54 control
subjects,16 the odds ratio for glaucoma was
higher in the middle and upper tertile of plasma selenium level (odd ratio 4.6
for middle tertile and 11.3 for upper tertile). However, a protective effect was
seen at higher levels of aqueous humour selenium level in this study, with the
largest effect seen in the middle tertile (odds radio 0.06 for middle tertile
and 0.41 for upper tertile).
This association between high plasma selenium level and
glaucoma confirms the findings from the NPC trial, and suggests that selenium
supplementation may carry a risk of developing glaucoma. The suggested mechanism
is that excess selenium saturates selenium-related enzyme pools causing cell
damage before excretion.
In summary, there are both biological and human studies
suggesting selenium supplementation is linked with an increased incidence of
glaucoma.
Selenium and age-related
maculopathy—When selenium was given as part of a wider
anti-oxidant package in a double blinded study, patients with age-related
maculopathy of any type did not experience any decrease in visual acuity over a
period of 1.5 years, as measured by LogMAR visual
acuity.12 In another randomised controlled
trial, supplementation with lutein and a wider anti-oxidant package including
selenium was associated with an improvement in snellen visual acuity and macular
pigment optical density compared to
placebo.17,18 However, there was no added
benefit shown with the added anti-oxidant package as compared to supplementation
with lutein alone. Furthermore, there are three case-control studies addressing
the level of serum selenium and age-related
maculopathy.19-21
Two studies showed lower serum selenium level in patients
with age-related maculopathy, and one showed no statistically significant
relationship. There are two Cochrane reviews on the effect of antioxidant
supplementation in preventing or slowing the progression of age-related
maculopathy. They concluded that an antioxidant package may be of modest benefit
in slowing the progression of age-related
maculopathy,22 but there is no evidence that
the antioxidant package may delay the onset of age-related
maculopathy.23 However, these conclusions
cannot be applied directly to selenium as one of the Cochrane reviews did not
include any trials that has selenium as part of its
intervention,23 and the other review only
included two trials12,17,18 where selenium was
given as part of a wider anti-oxidant
package.22
Diabetic retinopathy—There has been
published data on the beneficial effect of selenium, either given alone or as a
wider package of anti-oxidants, on diabetic retinopathy in rat
models.24–29 There is no human study on
selenium supplementation and diabetic retinopathy.
Selenium and general health—Severe
selenium deficiency is known to cause Keshan Disease, an endemic cardiomyopathy
characterised by multifocal myocardial necrosis and fibrous bone replacement,
and Kashin-Beck disease, an endemic osteoarthropathy where degeneration and
necrosis of the joints and epiphyseal-plate cartilages are
seen.2 These diseases are mainly seen in low
selenium regions of China, where foods with the lowest selenium content are
found.30
Both diseases can be prevented by selenium
supplementation.2 There is evidence that less
overt selenium deficiency is linked to loss of immunocompetence, increase in a
number of viral infections, low mood, suboptimal fertility, impairment in
thyroid function, cardiovascular disease, and inflammatory conditions such as
chronic pancreatitis.31
Selenium supplementation of 200mcg daily has been linked to
a reduced risk of lung, colorectal, prostate and liver cancers as secondary
end-point analysis in two randomised controlled trials performed in
1990’s.13,32 A comprehensive report on
mineral supplements and chronic disease published by the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (United States Government, 2006) concluded that there is
moderate benefit on total cancer prevention by selenium
supplement.33
A Cochrane Systemic Review published in 2008 concluded that
selenium used singly or with other antioxidants significantly reduced all-cause
mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98), although this effect disappeared when
high-risk bias trials were excluded.34
The latest data suggests that the above effect is due to
study bias. Two large-scale trials addressing selenium and general health were
published in December 2008. In a well-designed phase 3 randomised controlled
trial involving 35535 men with adequate serum selenium level from the United
States, Canada and Puerto Rico, 200 mcg per day of selenium supplementation did
not have any statistically significant effect in reducing the risk of prostate
cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, overall primary cancer, significant
cardiovascular events, and overall mortality, over a time period of 5.46
years.35
In a case-control study involving 959 men with prostate
cancer and 1059 controls, there was no relationship between prostate cancer risk
and plasma selenium level.36
Selenium toxicityAcute selenium toxicity with industrial selenious acid is
invariably fatal, preceded by stupor, respiratory depression and
hypotension.1 Hair loss, brittle nails, and
garlic breath are seen with chronic selenosis in seleniferous areas, including
the Northern great plain of USA, parts of Venezuela and Colombia, and Enshi
county of China with an average intake of 4900 mcg per
day.37
A published report showed no signs of toxicity with selenium
intake of up to 819 microgram / day in China and 724 microgram / day in USA from
cereal or rice in the form of selenomethionine or
selenite.38,39 In a study of Inuit of North
Greenland where daily intake of selenium at levels up to 5885 mcg per day in the
form of selenocystine from meat and organs of marine animals, no sign of
toxicity was seen apart from striation of
nails.37
In Australia and New Zealand, nutrient reference values set
a safe upper limit for selenium intake of 400
microgram/day.40 This is considered a safe
intake that will not produce toxicity in the majority of the population.
On the other hand, there is evidence that selenium
supplementation may not be entirely safe for those with adequate selenium
status. A study has linked selenium supplementation with type II diabetes
(hazard ratio 1.55, 95%CI 1.03–2.33).41
Elevated serum selenium was linked to higher level of total cholesterol, LDL
cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and
triglycerides.42
Furthermore, a U-shape relationship between serum selenium
and risk of peripheral vascular disease (increasing serum selenium level to 150
to 160 microgram/L appears to be protective, but followed by gradual increase in
risk afterwards), and mortality (decreased risk up to 130 microgram/l but
increase in risk in higher level) has been
observed.43,44
Selenium intake and adequacy in New ZealandThe selenium content in the food chain depends on the region
the food is grown and its soil selenium
content.30 Average soil globally contains 0.1
to 2 mg of selenium per kg. It has been documented that soil in parts of New
Zealand has a lower than average selenium soil content. For example, the soil in
the central volcanic plateau of North Island and most of the South Island
contains less than 0.5 mg of selenium per kg, and a higher incidence of selenium
responsive diseases is seen in sheep from these
areas.45
The low soil selenium level is reflected in the selenium
content of plants – wholewheat grain produced in the USA on average
contains 2 mg of selenium per kg, whereby New Zealand produce on average
contains only 0.1mg of selenium per kg.30
The minimum concentration of plasma selenium to support
maximum GPx activity in humans is 1.00-1.14
micromol/L.46 In New Zealand, the recommended
daily intake is 70 mcg per day for men, and 60 mcg per day for
women.40
The selenium intake estimated from a simulated New Zealand
diet was 67 mcg per day for men and 49 mcg per day for
women,47 confirming that a proportion of the
population is not achieving the recommended daily intake of selenium. However,
these estimated figures for selenium intake come from a 2003–2004 total
diet survey. There have been several reports suggesting the blood selenium
concentration of South Island residents has been increasing over past 10
years.48 This is possibly due to the use of
selenium supplementation in animal feeds and a change in dietary pattern
(greater use of multigrain bread and imported legumes and
nuts).48 So it is likely that New Zealand
selenium intakes are now higher.
Even within New Zealand there is a significant difference in
selenium intake between the North and South Islands. Imported wheat, especially
Australian wheat, is higher in selenium and is used for all bread making in the
north of the North Island, so that people in this region have higher selenium
intakes. In the south of the North Island about 30-35% of wheat used is
Australian. In the South Island usually all wheat is grown locally, accounting
for lower selenium intakes in that
region.48
Furthermore a 2004 New Zealand study showed that infants and
toddlers born in the South Island had suboptimal selenium dietary intake and
serum selenium levels.49 The current plasma
selenium levels of residents of the Otago region of the South Island are in the
range 0·76–1·65 micromol/L (60–130 microgram/l), which is
low compared to other countries.48
From this data it can be estimated a proportion of South
Islanders have a low selenium status and are not capable of sustaining maximal
GPx activity. In this group, the ambulatory, independently living elderly people
are more likely to be selenium
deficient.48
Despite the probable increased dietary intake of selenium
and the documented increase over the years of mean plasma selenium levels, the
selenium status of New Zealand population remains low compared to other
countries, and may be considered as marginal.48
Furthermore, an increase in plasma and whole blood GPx activities and levels of
functional selenoproteins were noted in New Zealanders after selenium
supplementation, which further supports that the current level of selenium
intake in New Zealand is not adequate to sustain optimal functioning of
selenoproteins.48,50
DiscussionThis article highlights that New Zealand soils are low in
selenium content and this means serum selenium levels in the New Zealand
population, especially in South Islanders, are low. An increasing selenium
content of our food supply is probably increasing our selenium status. Although
there is a limited evidence base, there is both biological plausibility and data
from animal and human studies that selenium deprivation contributes to cataract
formation and age-related maculopathy and selenium supplementation is beneficial
in prevention of both conditions.
In addition, selenium supplementation has a beneficial
effect on general health, improves mood and strengthens the immune system.
Although the level of selenium intake leading to chronic selenium toxicity
(around 700 microgram/day) is much higher than the level used in trials (up to
200 microgram/day), selenium supplementation may not be risk free for those with
adequate selenium status as it has been linked to an increased risk of diabetes,
and increased mortality.
How then should New Zealand eyecare professionals interpret
this data and what are the implications for the health of New Zealanders?
Eyecare professionals in New Zealand may choose to interpret
the data as inconclusive and await further study on this topic while offering no
recommendations to patients. Justification for such an approach lies in the lack
of evidence of a higher prevalence of cataract, cataract surgery or age-related
maculopathy in New Zealand (especially in the South Island) compared to other
Western nations. Proponents of this approach can also argue that further
research is needed to clarify selenium biochemistry, the role of selenium and
various selenoproteins in ocular health and the best form of
supplementation.
But data on selenium’s role in ocular health is
unlikely to be forthcoming in the near future given that this would require
randomised controlled trials which control for many confounding factors and
which would require vast amounts of resources and time. Alternative approaches
to clarify selenium’s role in ocular health would be to conduct an
ecological study comparing the rate of cataract in patients in the South Island
versus the North Island of New Zealand. Another methodological approach is to
assess the selenium levels of the Dunedin Study cohort, comparing those study
members who live in Dunedin with those who live elsewhere and correlating this
with eye disease when the cohort is a few decades older.
Eye care professionals may rather choose to adopt an
alternative approach and advise selenium supplementation to individuals at high
risk of selenium deficiency, cataract formation or age-related maculopathy after
assessment of their selenium status. Such individuals may include those over 65
years of age, South Island New Zealanders, patients with a family history of
cataract or age-related maculopathy and smokers.
When choosing selenium supplementation, it is not known
whether different forms of selenium supplementation have different biochemical
effects on the body. Based on the current evidence, the authors are not able to
recommend what the best form of selenium supplementation is but it would seem
sensible to increase selenium intake through foods (fish, poultry, eggs,
imported nuts and legumes) rather than supplements. It can be seen from Table 1
that brazil nuts and certain fish stand out as the best dietary sources of
selenium.
The consumption of two Brazil nuts daily is as effective in
raising plasma selenium concentration as is the consumption of a 100 microgram
selenium selenomethionine supplement, and a greater increase in whole blood GPx
activity was seen with Brazil nuts as compared with
supplements.50 However, as Brazil nuts contain
high levels of selenium, barium and radium, its consumption should be limited to
no more than a few nuts daily to avoid accumulation of these trace
minerals.50
The optimal dose of selenium and whether additional
supplements or co-factors (such as other anti-oxidants, minerals and vitamins)
are also needed for selenium to achieve its full beneficial effects are also
unclear.
For eye care professionals recommending selenium
supplementation it is reassuring to know that toxicity from selenium
supplementation is low and that selenium blood levels can be easily measured if
toxicity is of concern. But caution is required when implementing selenium
supplementation for those with chronic diseases who already have adequate plasma
selenium levels.
If eye care professionals choose to offer selenium
supplementation, how is such advice best provided? Discussion on selenium
supplementation is presently an unrealistic expectation with the time pressures
of most clinical consultations. Advice about selenium and optimal ocular health
is therefore best given within general advice for optimal ocular health via
pamphlets or posters, or by assistants or health promotional groups.
The authors encourage New Zealand eye care professionals to
interpret the data presented and decide whether selenium supplementation might
benefit the ocular and general health of New Zealanders who have low selenium
status.
Table 1. Selenium content in common food
groups51
* Brazil nuts stand out as having high selenium
content. However this can vary considerably, between 125 mcg and 2650 mcg
according to soil content, and it may contain significant level of radium and
barium.
Competing interests: None known.
Author information: Leo Sheck, Non-Training
Registrar, Department of Ophthalmology, Gisborne Hospital; Graham Wilson,
Consultant Ophthalmic Surgeon and Paediatric Ophthalmologist, Department of
Ophthalmology, Gisborne Hospital,
Correspondence: Leo Sheck, Department of
Ophthalmology, Gisborne Hospital, Private Bag 7001, Gisborne 4010, New Zealand.
Email sheck@xtra.co.nz
References:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |