![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geriatric medicine is becoming the core of hospital
business
Matthew Croucher
The medical care of the elderly is becoming the core
activity of general hospital-based medicine and surgery in New Zealand and this
will become increasingly evident over the next 50 years. In my view, younger
adult surgery and medicine will become the exception and not the rule, and
hospital doctors may consider the care of younger adults with standard
single-diagnosis problems to be “practice” for the real job of
caring for older people in all their complex, challenging glory.
Is this just a polemic statement? The main drivers for this
trend are unarguable and simple: increasing longevity is the main current reason
behind this massive population trend, and shows no signs of slowing down; and
the slow ageing of the “Baby Boomers” will be the main force behind
this dynamic in the near future.1
An audit of admissions to Christchurch Public Hospital, not
counting the Canterbury District Health Board’s (CDHB’s) rehab or
geriatric wards in other hospitals, revealed that (in 1 week) 62% of general
medical admissions were for people over 65 (in fact, 32% were 80 and over) as
were 32% of general surgical admissions. Over the whole hospital, including
paeds and gynae units, 41% of acute admissions in Christchurch were over the age
of 65; 38% of the general hospital outpatient visits that week were also for
people over the age of 65.2
These statistics are especially challenging when it is
recognised that the portion of the CDHB catchment area made up of over 65s from
which these admissions and clinical reviews were generated was only around
13.6%.3 Since it is this ageing segment of the
total population that is set to expand significantly, and since the fastest
growing age demographic will probably be the over 85s, this is sobering news for
health services indeed.1
One response to this is to recognise that it is time for
general and sub-specialist medics and surgeons, the nursing and allied health
teams with which they work, primary care health services and the health system
as a whole to wake up, smell the roses and learn as much as possible from
geriatrics and its related disciplines. One of many lessons will be to accord
“brain failure” the same level of respect with which heart failure,
kidney failure and liver failure are currently imbued. Rodwell and colleagues
demonstrate in this issue one of the features of this peculiar
neglect.4
Delirium and dementia are very common among hospitalised
elders.5,6 These manifestations of acute and
chronic brain failure are predictors of
mortality.6,7 Patients and their families tell
me they are very concerned about the effects of malfunctioning brains, sometimes
more so than they are about the other-organ disease that may have been the
presenting complaint to hospital.
Standard inpatient care may be compromised if cognitive
impairment is not taken into account as may standard outpatient follow-up.
Lengths of stay increase, as do costs, something hospital administrators are
concerned about, for example, in respect of high ‘hospital sitter’ /
special nursing budgets.8
The first step is to improve diagnosis, something that
Rodwell and colleague’s paper shows is not currently done well at
Christchurch Public Hospital4—and there
is no reason to think that other New Zealand hospitals do any better. The days
of “STML”, “confusion”, “cognitive
impairment” or worse, no entry at all appearing in discharge letters for
people with dementia or delirium must surely be over. This is the equivalent of
writing “acute abdomen” or “shortness of breath” as a
final diagnosis after a surgical or medical admission and reflects an inability
or an unwillingness to make a diagnosis of these common manifestations of brain
failure.
Perhaps the main reason that this occurs is because there is
little sense within our general hospitals of surgical and medical teams being
confident that they can manage dementia and delirium themselves, certainly not
as confidently as they can manage congestive heart failure. Why diagnose if you
cannot recommend an effective treatment plan? Discovering the elements that
constitute effective management plans for dementia and delirium are lessons to
be learned from psychiatry of old age and related geriatric disciplines.
The challenge for geriatric services will be to become
sufficiently integrated into general hospital teams so that this transfer of
hard-won lessons and skills can occur smoothly, to the benefit of all.
Competing interests: None known.
Author information: Matthew Croucher,
Psychiatrist of Old Age, Canterbury District Health Board—and Clinical
Senior Lecturer, University of Otago, Christchurch
Correspondence: Dr Matthew Croucher, The
Walshe Centre, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, New Zealand 8140. Email: Matthew.Croucher@cdhb.govt.nz
References:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |