![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PHARMAC and New Zealand pharmacy
Scahill et al1 describe the
landscape for New Zealand pharmacy and touch on the role of Pharmaceutical
Management Agency (PHARMAC) and its impact on pharmacy.
We accept that PHARMAC's work has an impact on what
pharmacists do, but we are committed to minimising that impact as much as
possible. In recent years we have been working to remove 'niggles' from the work
of pharmacists, and this has included reviewing and, where appropriate, removing
Special Authority requirements for medicines and looking closely at dispensing
rules.
Part of this involves listening to the feedback we receive,
both informally and through formal consultation processes. Scahill et al refer
to a "recent example is the need for community pharmacists to check the
scope of practice of the prescriber for every prescription received". This
was proposed by PHARMAC, but as a result of the feedback we have received, we
changed our approach and no longer propose to include such references.
Rather than an example of PHARMAC's hand hindering pharmacy,
this is a good illustration of PHARMAC's determination to work cooperatively
with pharmacy, listen to feedback and remove unnecessary obstacles where we
can.
Rachel Mackay
Manager, Schedule and Contracts PHARMAC, Wellington Reference:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |