![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quackery with impunity
(But is this law? Ay, marry,
is't.—Hamlet.)
Published in NZMJ 1911 May;10(38):1.
A lady in the prime of life consulted a Wellington doctor
about two years ago and was advised to undergo an operation for the removal of a
fibroid tumour about the size of a hen’s egg. Neglecting this advice, she
took a long course of treatment from a company that agreed to remove the tumour
by “rational means without operation.” At great cost, she bought
their medicaments, and the chief part of the treatment was the use of so-called
pastilles, which caused a daily discharge of blood, clot and eschar.
With gladness the poor creature preserved in glass jars
these materials, and was repeatedly assured by the company that what she had
collected was the tumour coming away. She became ghastly anaemic and faint, and
finally could not leave her bed, and then she sent for the doctor who had seen
her previously. He found the tumour was the size of a football! The patient died
of anaemia and heart failure, or more plainly, her life was vilely cast away
through the improper treatment of quacks, who batten on helpless suffering
women.
Each of this tribe of infamous charlatans deserves the curse
that fell on Shylock—“O be thou damn'd, inexorable dog...for thy
desires are wolfish, bloody, starv'd and ravenous.”
The Law cannot raise the dead, but can it not protect the
living? Oh, that those who have authority would hoist Lord Nelson”s
favorite battle-signal—“Engage the enemy more closely!” They
are but half-hearted in the struggle.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |