![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is late-night salivary cortisol a better screening
test for possible cortisol excess than standard screening tests in obese
patients with Type 2 diabetes?
Elna Ellis, Paul K L Chin, Penelope J Hunt, Helen Lunt, John
G Lewis, Steven G Soule
Overt Cushing’s syndrome is associated with a high
prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (60%) and Type 2 diabetes
(15–20%), reflecting multiple adverse effects of glucocorticoids on
glucose homeostasis.1 These include increased
hepatic gluconeogenesis, peripheral insulin resistance and finally a suppressive
effect of glucocorticoids on beta-cell function. Furthermore, patients with Type
2 diabetes (T2DM) often have several clinical features of Cushing’s
syndrome, including central weight excess, hypertension and hyperglycaemia,
raising the question of whether cortisol excess is more common in patients with
T2DM than in a control population.2
An early prospective study by Catargi et al of 200
overweight inpatients with poorly controlled T2DM (HbA1C>8%) reported a 2%
prevalence of occult Cushing’s syndrome and concluded that systematic
screening for cortisol excess might be warranted in this
group.3 Apart from a 9.4% prevalence of
subclinical Cushing’s syndrome later reported by Chiodini et
al,4 subsequent studies have generally found a
low prevalence of Cushing’s syndrome in patients with T2DM (0–1%),
arguing against routine
screening.5–8
Salivary cortisol is in equilibrium with
biologically-active-free plasma cortisol and has a circadian rhythm which
mirrors plasma cortisol. The measurement of late night salivary cortisol has
been promoted as a non-invasive screening test for cortisol excess with
92–100% sensitivity and 93–100% specificity for the diagnosis of
Cushing’s syndrome.9–12 However
recent Endocrine Society guidelines caution that ‘the influence of gender,
age and coexisting medical conditions on late night salivary cortisol
concentrations has not been fully
characterised.’13
Previous studies utilising measurement of plasma and 24-hour
urine cortisol (24hr UFC) have suggested that patients with T2DM, particularly
those with microvascular complications, have activation of the
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis.14–16
There is however limited and conflicting data regarding the utility of
late night salivary cortisol to screen for cortisol excess in the setting of
T2DM.
A study by Liu et al suggested that a raised bedtime
salivary cortisol (>10nmol/L) was relatively uncommon in 141 patients with
T2DM without Cushing’s syndrome (3%).17
Conversely, Mullan et al recently reported that 23% of 201 consecutive
T2DM patients without evidence of Cushing’s syndrome had a raised bedtime
salivary cortisol (>10nmol/L).8
We hypothesised that bedtime salivary cortisol would be more
specific than conventional tests, namely the overnight 1mg dexamethasone
suppression test (1mg DST) and 24hr UFC, in screening for Cushing’s
syndrome in patients with T2DM. Thus we aimed to clarify the diagnostic
performance of bedtime salivary cortisol compared with the 1mg DST and 24hr UFC
in this patient group.
Since we were interested in examining the specificity of the
various screening tests in the context of T2DM, we systematically excluded
patients who had clinical features suspicious for cortisol excess.
MethodsInclusion and exclusion
criteria—We prospectively recruited 40 patients from the
Christchurch Diabetes Centre outpatient clinic.
Inclusion criteria for the study were
Exclusion criteria were
Testing
protocol—Baseline clinical and demographic data were recorded.
Patients performed the three tests in the order listed with
supervision by an endocrinology research nurse:
Steroid assays—Plasma,
urinary and salivary cortisol were measured directly by an enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using monoclonal
antibodies.20 For saliva and urine the cortisol
was extracted with dichloromethane prior to ELISA whereas plasma cortisol
was measured by a direct ELISA. The salivary cortisol assay has a limit of
detection (LOD) of 3nmol/L, interassay coefficient of variation (CV) of 12.6%
for the "low control" (mean cortisol value 7 nmol/L) and 7.4% for the "high
control" (mean cortisol value 22 nmol/L). The urinary cortisol assay has a
LOD of 22nmol/L and interassay CV of 8.5–13.3% over the range of 99
to 217nmol/L. The plasma cortisol assay has a LOD of 55nmol/L and
interassay CV of 6.9–8.5% over the range of 98 to 1007nmol/L).
Statistical analyses—Test
specificity was defined as:
![]() Specificity was calculated based on the assumption that
all included patients did not have Cushing’s syndrome.
McNemar’s Chi-squared test was used to compare
the performance of the screening tests, in terms of specificity for
Cushing’s syndrome. The 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of each
test’s specificity was calculated using the binomial distribution.
The relationships between BMI, HbA1C and salivary
cortisol, 1mg-DST and 24hr-UFC were examined by Spearman’s rank
correlation coefficient. GraphPad Prism version 5.04 for Windows (GraphPad
Software, San Diego, California USA) was used to generate the graphs.
The study was approved by the New Zealand Upper South B
Regional Ethics Committee, and informed written consent was obtained from all
patients.
ResultsDemographic dataForty patients with T2DM were studied, 15 male and 25
female, with mean age 56 years (31–75), BMI
37kg/m2 (31–56) and HbA1C 8.6%
(6.2–11.6). Overall glycaemic control was suboptimal with only 6 subjects
(15%) having HbA1C ≤7% and 9 (23%) ≤7.5%.
Biochemical dataSalivary cortisol—32 subjects (80%)
provided 5 bedtime salivary samples, a further five (12.5%) provided 4 samples,
two provided 3 samples (5%) and a single patient provided only 2 samples (2.5%).
Applying the 10nmol/L cutoff for bedtime salivary cortisol, 12/40 had at least
one salivary cortisol result ≥10nmol/L—a false positive rate of 30%
or specificity of 70% (95% CI 53–83%) (see Figure 1).
Seven of the 12 patients with one or more raised salivary
cortisol results had only a single salivary cortisol minimally raised in
the10–15nmol/L range and had both normal 1mg DST and 24hr UFC. Table 1
details the results of the remaining 5 subjects (with at least one salivary
cortisol >15nmol/L or 10–15nmol/L with another abnormal test result).
((View Table 1 and Figure 1 here))
24hr UFC and 1mg DST—39 subjects
completed a 24-hour urine collection and the 1mg DST. The specificity of the 1mg
DST using the conventional cutoff of <50nmol/L was only 72% (95% CI 55-85%).
The 24hr UFC had a specificity of 90% (95% CI 76-97%) using the cutoff
<400nmol (see Figures 2 and 3).
Figure 2. 24-hour urine-free cortisol
amounts
![]() Note: Each dot represents one result
(n=39 for 39 patients); Broken horizontal line represent cutoff (see
text).
Figure 3. Plasma cortisol concentrations
post-1mg dexamethasone suppression test
![]() Note: Each dot represents one result
(n=39 for 39 patients)Broken horizontal line represents cutoff (see text).
Overall, the specificity of salivary cortisol was inferior
to 24hr UFC (P=0.039) but not 1mg DST (P>0.99). The difference in specificity
between 24hr UFC (cutoff <400nmol) and 1mg DST (cutoff <50nmol/L) was not
statistically significant (P=0.146).
Relationship between cortisol results and demographic dataThere was no significant relationship between BMI, HbA1C and
either the mean salivary cortisol, 1mg DST or 24hr UFC. There was a significant
positive correlation between the mean salivary cortisol and 1mg DST cortisol
(r=0.36, P=0.02) but not with 24hr UFC (r=0.19, P=0.2).
DiscussionBedtime salivary cortisol is promoted as an accurate
diagnostic test for Cushing’s syndrome in view of the close correlation of
salivary cortisol with free circulating cortisol, the ease of sample collection
and the stability of salivary cortisol at room
temperature.9–12 The reported test
sensitivity and specificity are between 95 and 98%, suggesting that bedtime
salivary cortisol is an ideal screening test for Cushing’s
syndrome.1 However the utility of bedtime
salivary cortisol in the setting of T2DM remains contentious with the prevalence
of raised salivary cortisol (>10nmol/L) in the two available studies reported
as 3% and 23% respectively.8,17
Our study was designed to determine the specificity of
bedtime salivary cortisol in obese patients with T2DM in the real world setting
and aimed to answer the clinical question: how likely is it that a raised
bedtime salivary cortisol in an obese patient with T2DM is a false positive
result? We thus selected patients who did not have clinical features suspicious
of Cushing’s syndrome and performed standard screening tests for cortisol
excess (bedtime salivary cortisol, 1mg DST and 24hr UFC) to compare the
specificity of the tests in this context.
Our results indicate that the specificity of bedtime
salivary cortisol using the cutoff of <10nmol/L (70%) was inferior to 24hr
UFC using the cutoff of <400nmol (90%, P=0.039) but not 1mg DST using the
conventional cutoff of <50nmol/L (72%, P>0.99).
Several previous studies have examined the activity of the
HPA axis in patients with T2DM. Early reports found no alteration of the HPA
axis in T2DM21,22 although several more detailed recent studies
have consistently described increased HPA axis activity as reflected by an
elevation of basal ACTH, basal and post-dexamethasone cortisol, 24-hour urinary
and salivary cortisol.15,17,23–25
Furthermore, in a study of 190 patients with T2DM, Oltmanns et
al26 described a positive relationship between
diurnal salivary cortisol concentrations and HbA1C, as well as fasting and
postprandial glucose. Oltmanns speculated that the stimulatory effect of
cortisol on hepatic gluconeogenesis may exacerbate hyperglycaemia and ultimately
promote the development of diabetes-related
complications.26 This hypothesis is supported
by cross-sectional studies which revealed a relationship between increased HPA
axis activity and several diabetes complications, in particular carotid
atherosclerosis, diabetic retinopathy and
polyneuropathy.14,27,28 Although correlations observed in
cross-sectional studies do not prove causation, a putative mechanism for HPA
axis activation is a reduction in parasympathetic tone, which may result in
disproportionate sympathetic activation of the HPA
axis.29
Our study, similar to recent reports, suggested activation
of the HPA axis in a group of generally poorly controlled T2DM patients (mean
HbA1C 8.6%) with a relatively high prevalence of false positive screening tests
for cortisol excess (30% by bedtime salivary cortisol, 28% by 1mg DST and 10% by
24hr UFC) when applying cutoffs derived from a healthy reference population. The
high rate of false positive screening tests for cortisol excess in our patient
population, in whom Cushing’s syndrome was not felt to be clinically
likely, suggests that to confidently diagnose Cushing’s syndrome in the
setting of T2DM requires the use of normative data derived from a control
population of patients with T2DM rather than from healthy controls.
In contrast to the earlier report of a positive association
between glycaemic control and cortisol
secretion,26 our study did not reveal any
correlation between HbA1C and several measures of cortisol secretion, possibly
due to the limited number of subjects enrolled and the relatively narrow range
of HbA1C results.
The overlap of clinical features in patients with
Cushing’s syndrome and centrally obese patients with T2DM has raised the
question whether routine screening for cortisol excess is warranted in the
context of obese patients with T2DM. This issue has been studied by several
groups who have reported a variable prevalence of Cushing’s syndrome
ranging from 0–9.4% (Table 2).3-8 Of
note, the prevalence of 9.4% reported by Chiodini et
al4 referred to subclinical hypercortisolism, a
biochemical diagnosis defined by failure of suppression of cortisol following
1mg DST with either a raised 24hr UFC, suppressed plasma ACTH or raised midnight
cortisol. This remarkably high prevalence may be a reflection of the patient
population studied (inpatients admitted for poor glycaemic control) and the use
of test criteria determined in a healthy control population. On the basis of the
relatively low reported prevalence of Cushing’s syndrome in most screening
studies (0–3%), consensus expert opinion is that systematic screening for
Cushing’s syndrome in obese patients with T2DM is not
warranted.13
There are several limitations to our study. Obviously, the
results of the study are highly dependent on the cortisol “cutoff”
levels used to define an abnormal result. Whilst our cutoff for salivary
cortisol was derived from an ‘in-house’ reference population, the
other normal ranges were derived from the published literature rather than our
own control population, which may have affected the results. Further, the
specificity of the overnight DST in this setting of obesity may have been
improved with the use of a higher dose of
dexamethasone.30
It is also relevant that in our study each participant had
several measurements of salivary cortisol compared with only one measurement of
urine cortisol excretion and a single 1mg DST, potentially increasing the chance
of a spurious salivary result. Additionally, the accuracy of 24-hour urine
samples is also questionable because the compliance with urine collection
instructions is known to be notoriously variable. Another concern is that we
assumed that the included patients did not have Cushing’s syndrome, based
on the absence of clinical features. However, some of the five subjects with
clearly abnormal results (as defined in Table 1) may have had mild
Cushing’s syndrome at the time of the study. We have not formally
re-evaluated the patients but are not aware that any of these five patients have
subsequently developed overt Cushing’s syndrome 2 to 4 years following
study completion. Alternatively, these patients may have had other conditions
associated with elevated cortisol that were not part of our exclusion criteria,
such as obstructive sleep apnoea.
In conclusion, in a population of obese patients with poorly
controlled T2DM selected for the absence of specific features of cortisol
excess, bedtime salivary cortisol has a high false positive rate (30%). This
suggests that the test has limited specificity in this clinical context and
raises questions regarding the utility of bedtime salivary cortisol as a
screening test for Cushing’s syndrome in patients with T2DM.
Based on our data, 24hr UFC has the lowest rate of false
positive results. We cannot comment on test sensitivity, as we did not study a
population with proven Cushing’s syndrome. Thus, it is important to
emphasise that conventional tests for cortisol excess (1mg DST, 24hr UFC and
bedtime salivary cortisol) have low specificity in obese patients with T2DM and
such results need to be interpreted with caution.
Competing interests: None
declared.
Author information: Elna Ellis,
Endocrinology Registrar, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch;
Paul K L Chin, Clinical Pharmacology Registrar, Christchurch Hospital,
Christchurch; Penelope J Hunt, Consultant Endocrinologist,
Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch; Helen Lunt, Consultant Diabetologist,
Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch; John G Lewis, Steroid Biochemist,
Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch; Steven G Soule, Consultant
Endocrinologist, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch
Correspondence: Dr Steven G Soule,
Department of Endocrinology, Christchurch Hospital, Riccarton Avenue,
Christchurch, New Zealand. Fax: +64 (0)3 3641159; email: steven.soule@cdhb.govt.nz
References:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |