![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recertification of generalists
Dear Sir
The introduction of the recertification process for those
doctors not in vocational-training programmes has been a public relations
fiasco. It has alienated many of those involved who would have accepted a
properly reasoned explanation.
What we have had from the two protagonists, the Medical
Council and bpacnz (Best Practice Advocacy
Centre), has been limited. What has been offered is simply a welter of rhetoric
which goes nowhere near allaying the concerns of the 2500 doctors involved.
It seems it is now too late to stop the juggernaut.
Nevertheless, if the two major players wish the support and cooperation from
those afflicted they need to give credible answers to these questions:
In their
initial programme guide, bpacnz state they
reserve the right to review the annual fee, presently set at $1200. So the final
question is:
There is support for the need for
continuing education. What is proposed, and the manner of its introduction,
seems an unnecessarily convoluted and expensive way of providing it.
Humphrey B Rainey
Upper Hutt |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |