Paul Patten has jumped to the wrong conclusion in his 30 July 2010 letter published in theNZMJ. My reference to ‘the particular relationship ... with gynaecologists whose work she was researching' was not a reference to Professor Mantell and Dr Baird, as a close reading will show and as I have already acknowledged to Dr Baird.Professor Skegg wrote his own chapter in The Cartwright Papers. So did I. To condemn each of these chapters because we work in the same university is an odd basis for response. I suggest that it is better to read the chapters and make up one's own mind.Charlotte Paul Preventive and Social Medicine University of Otago, Dunedin
Patten P. A particular relationship [letter]. N Z Med J. 2010;123(1319). http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/123-1319/4243/content.pdf
Paul Patten has jumped to the wrong conclusion in his 30 July 2010 letter published in theNZMJ. My reference to ‘the particular relationship ... with gynaecologists whose work she was researching' was not a reference to Professor Mantell and Dr Baird, as a close reading will show and as I have already acknowledged to Dr Baird.Professor Skegg wrote his own chapter in The Cartwright Papers. So did I. To condemn each of these chapters because we work in the same university is an odd basis for response. I suggest that it is better to read the chapters and make up one's own mind.Charlotte Paul Preventive and Social Medicine University of Otago, Dunedin
Patten P. A particular relationship [letter]. N Z Med J. 2010;123(1319). http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/123-1319/4243/content.pdf
Paul Patten has jumped to the wrong conclusion in his 30 July 2010 letter published in theNZMJ. My reference to ‘the particular relationship ... with gynaecologists whose work she was researching' was not a reference to Professor Mantell and Dr Baird, as a close reading will show and as I have already acknowledged to Dr Baird.Professor Skegg wrote his own chapter in The Cartwright Papers. So did I. To condemn each of these chapters because we work in the same university is an odd basis for response. I suggest that it is better to read the chapters and make up one's own mind.Charlotte Paul Preventive and Social Medicine University of Otago, Dunedin
Patten P. A particular relationship [letter]. N Z Med J. 2010;123(1319). http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/123-1319/4243/content.pdf
Paul Patten has jumped to the wrong conclusion in his 30 July 2010 letter published in theNZMJ. My reference to ‘the particular relationship ... with gynaecologists whose work she was researching' was not a reference to Professor Mantell and Dr Baird, as a close reading will show and as I have already acknowledged to Dr Baird.Professor Skegg wrote his own chapter in The Cartwright Papers. So did I. To condemn each of these chapters because we work in the same university is an odd basis for response. I suggest that it is better to read the chapters and make up one's own mind.Charlotte Paul Preventive and Social Medicine University of Otago, Dunedin
Patten P. A particular relationship [letter]. N Z Med J. 2010;123(1319). http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/123-1319/4243/content.pdf
The full contents of this pages only available to subscribers.
Login, subscribe or email nzmj@nzma.org.nz to purchase this article.