In severe cases of Dupuytren’s contraction, certainly when the affected digits are rigidly bent into the palm, the operations in vogue are disappointing. Whether the surgeon divides or excises the palmar fascia he cannot straighten the contracted finger by manual force, still less can he trust to splint-pressure, however prolonged. The reason generally assigned is consecutive contraction of the flexor tendons. These have often been divided in the vain hope of overcoming the resistance. But it is easy to prove that the fault does not lie in the tendons, for full flexion of the wrist or metacarpo-phalangeal joints makes no difference.
Intra-articular adhesions in the metacarpo-phalangeal and interphalangeal joints of the contracted fingers might be invoked as the cause of the resistance, especially by those who see a close relation between this condition and gout or rheumatism. The idea of the existence of these adhesions is also favoured by the grave danger of stiffening of the fingers during the splint-treatment ordinarily pursued after operation. But the X-rays show a perfectly smooth articular surface in the joints. The cause of the resistance is as follows:—Owing to the second phalanx being extremely flexed so that its base is pressed against the neck of the first phalanx, and owing to this position being kept up during many months or years, the glenoid ligament in front of this joint, as well as the lateral ligaments, become shortened and incapable of extension.
The only way to overcome this obstacle is to excise the head of the first phalanx. This is done as follows:—
In severe cases of Dupuytren’s contraction, certainly when the affected digits are rigidly bent into the palm, the operations in vogue are disappointing. Whether the surgeon divides or excises the palmar fascia he cannot straighten the contracted finger by manual force, still less can he trust to splint-pressure, however prolonged. The reason generally assigned is consecutive contraction of the flexor tendons. These have often been divided in the vain hope of overcoming the resistance. But it is easy to prove that the fault does not lie in the tendons, for full flexion of the wrist or metacarpo-phalangeal joints makes no difference.
Intra-articular adhesions in the metacarpo-phalangeal and interphalangeal joints of the contracted fingers might be invoked as the cause of the resistance, especially by those who see a close relation between this condition and gout or rheumatism. The idea of the existence of these adhesions is also favoured by the grave danger of stiffening of the fingers during the splint-treatment ordinarily pursued after operation. But the X-rays show a perfectly smooth articular surface in the joints. The cause of the resistance is as follows:—Owing to the second phalanx being extremely flexed so that its base is pressed against the neck of the first phalanx, and owing to this position being kept up during many months or years, the glenoid ligament in front of this joint, as well as the lateral ligaments, become shortened and incapable of extension.
The only way to overcome this obstacle is to excise the head of the first phalanx. This is done as follows:—
In severe cases of Dupuytren’s contraction, certainly when the affected digits are rigidly bent into the palm, the operations in vogue are disappointing. Whether the surgeon divides or excises the palmar fascia he cannot straighten the contracted finger by manual force, still less can he trust to splint-pressure, however prolonged. The reason generally assigned is consecutive contraction of the flexor tendons. These have often been divided in the vain hope of overcoming the resistance. But it is easy to prove that the fault does not lie in the tendons, for full flexion of the wrist or metacarpo-phalangeal joints makes no difference.
Intra-articular adhesions in the metacarpo-phalangeal and interphalangeal joints of the contracted fingers might be invoked as the cause of the resistance, especially by those who see a close relation between this condition and gout or rheumatism. The idea of the existence of these adhesions is also favoured by the grave danger of stiffening of the fingers during the splint-treatment ordinarily pursued after operation. But the X-rays show a perfectly smooth articular surface in the joints. The cause of the resistance is as follows:—Owing to the second phalanx being extremely flexed so that its base is pressed against the neck of the first phalanx, and owing to this position being kept up during many months or years, the glenoid ligament in front of this joint, as well as the lateral ligaments, become shortened and incapable of extension.
The only way to overcome this obstacle is to excise the head of the first phalanx. This is done as follows:—
The full contents of this pages only available to subscribers.
Login, subscribe or email nzmj@nzma.org.nz to purchase this article.