View Article PDF
Charge
At a hearing held 9 March 2018 the Health Practitioner’s Disciplinary Tribunal considered a charge laid by the Professional Conduct Committee (PCC) against David Lim (the doctor).
The charge alleged that the doctor had been convicted, following trial in the district court, of five charges of stupefaction without lawful justification and five charges of indecent assault.
These charges related to four separate victims. The doctor was sentenced to a total of five years imprisonment.
The hearing proceeded by way of an agreed summary of facts.
Findings
The Tribunal found the charge established and disciplinary sanction was necessary.
Penalty
The Tribunal censured the doctor; cancelled his registration as a medical practitioner and ordered him to pay a total contribution of $4,380 towards the costs of the PCC and the Tribunal.
A full copy of the decision can be viewed at: http://www.hpdt.org.nz/ChargeDetails.aspx?file=Med17/412P
Summary
Abstract
Aim
Method
Results
Conclusion
Author Information
Acknowledgements
Correspondence
Correspondence Email
Competing Interests
For the PDF of this article,
contact nzmj@nzma.org.nz
View Article PDF
Charge
At a hearing held 9 March 2018 the Health Practitioner’s Disciplinary Tribunal considered a charge laid by the Professional Conduct Committee (PCC) against David Lim (the doctor).
The charge alleged that the doctor had been convicted, following trial in the district court, of five charges of stupefaction without lawful justification and five charges of indecent assault.
These charges related to four separate victims. The doctor was sentenced to a total of five years imprisonment.
The hearing proceeded by way of an agreed summary of facts.
Findings
The Tribunal found the charge established and disciplinary sanction was necessary.
Penalty
The Tribunal censured the doctor; cancelled his registration as a medical practitioner and ordered him to pay a total contribution of $4,380 towards the costs of the PCC and the Tribunal.
A full copy of the decision can be viewed at: http://www.hpdt.org.nz/ChargeDetails.aspx?file=Med17/412P
Summary
Abstract
Aim
Method
Results
Conclusion
Author Information
Acknowledgements
Correspondence
Correspondence Email
Competing Interests
For the PDF of this article,
contact nzmj@nzma.org.nz
View Article PDF
Charge
At a hearing held 9 March 2018 the Health Practitioner’s Disciplinary Tribunal considered a charge laid by the Professional Conduct Committee (PCC) against David Lim (the doctor).
The charge alleged that the doctor had been convicted, following trial in the district court, of five charges of stupefaction without lawful justification and five charges of indecent assault.
These charges related to four separate victims. The doctor was sentenced to a total of five years imprisonment.
The hearing proceeded by way of an agreed summary of facts.
Findings
The Tribunal found the charge established and disciplinary sanction was necessary.
Penalty
The Tribunal censured the doctor; cancelled his registration as a medical practitioner and ordered him to pay a total contribution of $4,380 towards the costs of the PCC and the Tribunal.
A full copy of the decision can be viewed at: http://www.hpdt.org.nz/ChargeDetails.aspx?file=Med17/412P
Summary
Abstract
Aim
Method
Results
Conclusion
Author Information
Acknowledgements
Correspondence
Correspondence Email
Competing Interests
Contact diana@nzma.org.nz
for the PDF of this article
View Article PDF
Charge
At a hearing held 9 March 2018 the Health Practitioner’s Disciplinary Tribunal considered a charge laid by the Professional Conduct Committee (PCC) against David Lim (the doctor).
The charge alleged that the doctor had been convicted, following trial in the district court, of five charges of stupefaction without lawful justification and five charges of indecent assault.
These charges related to four separate victims. The doctor was sentenced to a total of five years imprisonment.
The hearing proceeded by way of an agreed summary of facts.
Findings
The Tribunal found the charge established and disciplinary sanction was necessary.
Penalty
The Tribunal censured the doctor; cancelled his registration as a medical practitioner and ordered him to pay a total contribution of $4,380 towards the costs of the PCC and the Tribunal.
A full copy of the decision can be viewed at: http://www.hpdt.org.nz/ChargeDetails.aspx?file=Med17/412P
Summary
Abstract
Aim
Method
Results
Conclusion
Author Information
Acknowledgements
Correspondence
Correspondence Email
Competing Interests
Contact diana@nzma.org.nz
for the PDF of this article
Indecent assault
Subscriber Content
The full contents of this pages only available to subscribers.
Login, subscribe or email nzmj@nzma.org.nz to purchase this article.
