No items found.

View Article PDF

Mike Daube’s editorial1 challenges us all to see the Smokefree 2025 goal realised. Reducing smoking prevalence to fall below five percent among all population groups is undoubtedly bold, but needs to be if we are to overcome the smoking epidemic. Currently, smoking is estimated to cause around 5,000 deaths2 each year, and around 550,000 New Zealanders remain addicted to nicotine.3 We need the audacity to plan a future in which the tobacco industry and its lethal products no longer have a pernicious hold on our population’s health.

We agree with Daube’s observation that progress since the goal was adopted in 2011 has been slow. This is despite the legacy of the Māori Affairs Select Committee, whose members first recommended setting a Smokefree 2025 goal.4 The previous Government introduced some important policies, such as getting rid of point-of-sale tobacco displays, but focused mainly on increasing individual cessation help, with quit attempts largely stimulated by higher taxation. There has been no overall plan, insufficient new population level policies and inadequate resources allocated to tobacco control.

With a new Government, we now have an opportunity to introduce a coordinated, evidence-based strategy. Already there are some signs of progress. The Minister of Health quickly recognised that a clear path was required to achieve the 2025 goal,5 and now Associate Minister Salesa has committed to creating a plan.6

The multi-level strategy Achieving Smokefree Aotearoa by 2025 (ASAP), launched last August, provides a clear roadmap for achieving the goal.7 ASAP 2025 drew on expertise from throughout the smokefree sector to create a plan that would reduce the incidence of smoking and create the first smokefree generation. Benefiting from wide consultation, particularly within the Māori and Pacific tobacco control sector, ASAP 2025 offers policymakers evidence-based options to accelerate progress.

To realise this progress, we need that extra push that can only be provided by Government itself. In the same way that the Australian government won accolades for their stance on introducing standardised packages,8 the New Zealand Government needs to demonstrate that sovereign rights to health should always take priority over the tobacco industry. Adopting the principles of the ASAP plan and resourcing the work would build on the work done throughout the tobacco control sector.

Now is the time for the Government to start breaking new ground. To date, addressing the issue of tobacco has largely focused on reducing demand for the product. We must intensify these efforts, but also address the availability of tobacco and start to regulate the product itself, so it is less appealing and less addictive.9–11 US Federal Drugs Administration has recently announced its intention to introduce policy measures in these areas.12

Rather than sell a lethal product through thousands of outlets, we should limit distribution and sell tobacco from outlets with secure storage and trained adult staff.13,14 Selling tobacco only from outlets open only to those over 18 would remove the product from its current everyday place in the retail environment.

Using community wisdom to inform the delivery of cessation services to high prevalence communities, and increasing funding for these services by drawing on tobacco excise tax, could enhance their reach and effectiveness, as well as reduce criticism directed at higher tobacco taxation as an effective measure, including the disproportionate effects on lower income groups.15 Greatly increased use of mass and social media to encourage quitting and discourage uptake should also be implemented.

The editorial gives pause for thought. Should we give up on the 2025 goal? Emphatically no! Doing so would betray the vast majority of smokers who want to quit.16–20 More particularly, abandoning the goal would be to betray Māori, who have suffered disproportionately from the impacts of tobacco. Abandoning the goal would also betray the vision of the Māori Affairs Select Committee, whose members conceived the 2025 goal.

So, we need the Government to step up quickly with action. Please Minister Salesa, we are waiting and there is no time to lose.

Summary

Abstract

Aim

Method

Results

Conclusion

Author Information

Martin Witt, Cancer Society of New Zealand, Canterbury West Coast;-Richard Edwards, Co-Director ASPIRE 2025, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington; Janet Hoek, Co-Director ASPIRE 2025, Department of Marketing, University of Otago, Dunedin; George Thomson, Assoc. Professor [Research] Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington.

Acknowledgements

Correspondence

Martin Witt, c/o Cancer Society Centre, PO Box 13-450, Christchurch 8141.

Correspondence Email

martin.witt@cancercwc.org.nz

Competing Interests

Nil.

  1. Daube M. Tobacco targets doomed to fail? N Z Med J 2018; 131(1473):25–41.
  2. Ministry of Health. (2004). Looking upstream: Causes of death cross-classified by risk and condition, New Zealand 1997.Wellington: Ministry of Health.
    http://minhealthnz.shinyapps.io/nz-health-survey-2016-17-tier-1/
  3. Ministry of Health. Tier 1 statistics 2016/17: New Zealand Health Survey. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Health, 2017. Accessed April 12, 2018.
  4. New Zealand Parliament. Inquiry into the tobacco industry in Aotearoa and the consequences of tobacco use for Māori. Report of the Māori Affairs Select Committee. Wellington: New Zealand Parliament; 2010.
  5. One News. Bold ideas needed for NZ to be smokefree by 2025. Auckland: Television New Zealand, October 30, 2017. Accessed April 26, 2018. http://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/watch-bold-ideas-needed-nz-smokefree-2025
  6. Thomas R. No room for complacency if we are to kick smoking by 2025, Helen Clark says. Stuff. March 27, 2018. http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/102608415/no-room-for-complacency-if-were-to-reach-kick-smoking-by-2025-helen-clark-says
  7. Thornley L, Edwards R, Waa A, et al. Achieving Smokefree Aotearoa by 2025. Wellington: University of Otago, Quitline Group Trust, Hāpai te Hauora, 2017. http://aspire2025.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/asap-main-report-for-web2.pdf
  8. Australian Commonwealth Government. Tobacco Plain Packaging Act [2016], Canberra, Australian Parliament Accessed April 18, 2018 http://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2016C00892
  9. Donny EC, Walker N, Hatsukami D, et al. Reducing the nicotine content of combusted tobacco products sold in New Zealand. Tob Control 2017; 26(e1):e37–e42. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053186
  10. Smith TT, Hatsukami DK, Benowitz NL, et al. Whether to push or pull? Nicotine reduction and non-combusted alternatives - Two strategies for reducing smoking and improving public health. Prev Med 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.03.021
  11. Hatsukami DK, Luo X, Dick L, et al. Reduced nicotine content cigarettes and use of alternative nicotine products: exploratory trial. Addiction 2017; 112(1):156–67. doi: 10.1111/add.13603
  12. US Food and Drug Administration (2018). “Tobacco Product Standard for Nicotine Level of Combusted Cigarettes: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking “ Federal Register 83 (52):11818–11843
  13. Robertson L, Marsh L, Edwards R, et al. Regulating tobacco retail in New Zealand: what can we learn from overseas? N Z Med J 2016; 129(1432):74–9.
  14. Roberson L, Gendall P, Hoek J, et al. Smokers’ Perceptions of the Relative Effectiveness of Five Tobacco Retail Reduction Policies. Nicotine Tob Res 2017; 19(2):245–52. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw193
  15. Hoek J, Smith K. A qualitative analysis of low income smokers’ responses to tobacco excise tax increases. Int J Drug Policy 2016; 37:82–8.
  16. Pechacek TF, Nayak P, Slovic P, et al. Reassessing the importance of ‘lost pleasure’ associated with smoking cessation: implications for social welfare and policy. Tob Control 2017 doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053734
  17. Wilson N, Edwards R, Weerasekera D. High levels of smoker regret by ethnicity and socioeconomic status: national survey data. N Z Med J 2009; 122(1292):99–100.
  18. Nayak P, Pechacek TF, Slovic P, et al. Regretting Ever Starting to Smoke: Results from a 2014 National Survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14(4) doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040390
  19. Sansone N, Fong GT, Lee WB, et al. Comparing the experience of regret and its predictors among smokers in four Asian countries: findings from the ITC surveys in Thailand, South Korea, Malaysia, and China. Nicotine Tob Res 2013; 15(10):1663–72. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt032
  20. Fong GT, Hammond D, Laux FL, et al. The near-universal experience of regret among smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey. Nicotine Tob Res 2004; 6 Suppl 3:S341–51.

For the PDF of this article,
contact nzmj@nzma.org.nz

View Article PDF

Mike Daube’s editorial1 challenges us all to see the Smokefree 2025 goal realised. Reducing smoking prevalence to fall below five percent among all population groups is undoubtedly bold, but needs to be if we are to overcome the smoking epidemic. Currently, smoking is estimated to cause around 5,000 deaths2 each year, and around 550,000 New Zealanders remain addicted to nicotine.3 We need the audacity to plan a future in which the tobacco industry and its lethal products no longer have a pernicious hold on our population’s health.

We agree with Daube’s observation that progress since the goal was adopted in 2011 has been slow. This is despite the legacy of the Māori Affairs Select Committee, whose members first recommended setting a Smokefree 2025 goal.4 The previous Government introduced some important policies, such as getting rid of point-of-sale tobacco displays, but focused mainly on increasing individual cessation help, with quit attempts largely stimulated by higher taxation. There has been no overall plan, insufficient new population level policies and inadequate resources allocated to tobacco control.

With a new Government, we now have an opportunity to introduce a coordinated, evidence-based strategy. Already there are some signs of progress. The Minister of Health quickly recognised that a clear path was required to achieve the 2025 goal,5 and now Associate Minister Salesa has committed to creating a plan.6

The multi-level strategy Achieving Smokefree Aotearoa by 2025 (ASAP), launched last August, provides a clear roadmap for achieving the goal.7 ASAP 2025 drew on expertise from throughout the smokefree sector to create a plan that would reduce the incidence of smoking and create the first smokefree generation. Benefiting from wide consultation, particularly within the Māori and Pacific tobacco control sector, ASAP 2025 offers policymakers evidence-based options to accelerate progress.

To realise this progress, we need that extra push that can only be provided by Government itself. In the same way that the Australian government won accolades for their stance on introducing standardised packages,8 the New Zealand Government needs to demonstrate that sovereign rights to health should always take priority over the tobacco industry. Adopting the principles of the ASAP plan and resourcing the work would build on the work done throughout the tobacco control sector.

Now is the time for the Government to start breaking new ground. To date, addressing the issue of tobacco has largely focused on reducing demand for the product. We must intensify these efforts, but also address the availability of tobacco and start to regulate the product itself, so it is less appealing and less addictive.9–11 US Federal Drugs Administration has recently announced its intention to introduce policy measures in these areas.12

Rather than sell a lethal product through thousands of outlets, we should limit distribution and sell tobacco from outlets with secure storage and trained adult staff.13,14 Selling tobacco only from outlets open only to those over 18 would remove the product from its current everyday place in the retail environment.

Using community wisdom to inform the delivery of cessation services to high prevalence communities, and increasing funding for these services by drawing on tobacco excise tax, could enhance their reach and effectiveness, as well as reduce criticism directed at higher tobacco taxation as an effective measure, including the disproportionate effects on lower income groups.15 Greatly increased use of mass and social media to encourage quitting and discourage uptake should also be implemented.

The editorial gives pause for thought. Should we give up on the 2025 goal? Emphatically no! Doing so would betray the vast majority of smokers who want to quit.16–20 More particularly, abandoning the goal would be to betray Māori, who have suffered disproportionately from the impacts of tobacco. Abandoning the goal would also betray the vision of the Māori Affairs Select Committee, whose members conceived the 2025 goal.

So, we need the Government to step up quickly with action. Please Minister Salesa, we are waiting and there is no time to lose.

Summary

Abstract

Aim

Method

Results

Conclusion

Author Information

Martin Witt, Cancer Society of New Zealand, Canterbury West Coast;-Richard Edwards, Co-Director ASPIRE 2025, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington; Janet Hoek, Co-Director ASPIRE 2025, Department of Marketing, University of Otago, Dunedin; George Thomson, Assoc. Professor [Research] Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington.

Acknowledgements

Correspondence

Martin Witt, c/o Cancer Society Centre, PO Box 13-450, Christchurch 8141.

Correspondence Email

martin.witt@cancercwc.org.nz

Competing Interests

Nil.

  1. Daube M. Tobacco targets doomed to fail? N Z Med J 2018; 131(1473):25–41.
  2. Ministry of Health. (2004). Looking upstream: Causes of death cross-classified by risk and condition, New Zealand 1997.Wellington: Ministry of Health.
    http://minhealthnz.shinyapps.io/nz-health-survey-2016-17-tier-1/
  3. Ministry of Health. Tier 1 statistics 2016/17: New Zealand Health Survey. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Health, 2017. Accessed April 12, 2018.
  4. New Zealand Parliament. Inquiry into the tobacco industry in Aotearoa and the consequences of tobacco use for Māori. Report of the Māori Affairs Select Committee. Wellington: New Zealand Parliament; 2010.
  5. One News. Bold ideas needed for NZ to be smokefree by 2025. Auckland: Television New Zealand, October 30, 2017. Accessed April 26, 2018. http://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/watch-bold-ideas-needed-nz-smokefree-2025
  6. Thomas R. No room for complacency if we are to kick smoking by 2025, Helen Clark says. Stuff. March 27, 2018. http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/102608415/no-room-for-complacency-if-were-to-reach-kick-smoking-by-2025-helen-clark-says
  7. Thornley L, Edwards R, Waa A, et al. Achieving Smokefree Aotearoa by 2025. Wellington: University of Otago, Quitline Group Trust, Hāpai te Hauora, 2017. http://aspire2025.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/asap-main-report-for-web2.pdf
  8. Australian Commonwealth Government. Tobacco Plain Packaging Act [2016], Canberra, Australian Parliament Accessed April 18, 2018 http://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2016C00892
  9. Donny EC, Walker N, Hatsukami D, et al. Reducing the nicotine content of combusted tobacco products sold in New Zealand. Tob Control 2017; 26(e1):e37–e42. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053186
  10. Smith TT, Hatsukami DK, Benowitz NL, et al. Whether to push or pull? Nicotine reduction and non-combusted alternatives - Two strategies for reducing smoking and improving public health. Prev Med 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.03.021
  11. Hatsukami DK, Luo X, Dick L, et al. Reduced nicotine content cigarettes and use of alternative nicotine products: exploratory trial. Addiction 2017; 112(1):156–67. doi: 10.1111/add.13603
  12. US Food and Drug Administration (2018). “Tobacco Product Standard for Nicotine Level of Combusted Cigarettes: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking “ Federal Register 83 (52):11818–11843
  13. Robertson L, Marsh L, Edwards R, et al. Regulating tobacco retail in New Zealand: what can we learn from overseas? N Z Med J 2016; 129(1432):74–9.
  14. Roberson L, Gendall P, Hoek J, et al. Smokers’ Perceptions of the Relative Effectiveness of Five Tobacco Retail Reduction Policies. Nicotine Tob Res 2017; 19(2):245–52. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw193
  15. Hoek J, Smith K. A qualitative analysis of low income smokers’ responses to tobacco excise tax increases. Int J Drug Policy 2016; 37:82–8.
  16. Pechacek TF, Nayak P, Slovic P, et al. Reassessing the importance of ‘lost pleasure’ associated with smoking cessation: implications for social welfare and policy. Tob Control 2017 doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053734
  17. Wilson N, Edwards R, Weerasekera D. High levels of smoker regret by ethnicity and socioeconomic status: national survey data. N Z Med J 2009; 122(1292):99–100.
  18. Nayak P, Pechacek TF, Slovic P, et al. Regretting Ever Starting to Smoke: Results from a 2014 National Survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14(4) doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040390
  19. Sansone N, Fong GT, Lee WB, et al. Comparing the experience of regret and its predictors among smokers in four Asian countries: findings from the ITC surveys in Thailand, South Korea, Malaysia, and China. Nicotine Tob Res 2013; 15(10):1663–72. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt032
  20. Fong GT, Hammond D, Laux FL, et al. The near-universal experience of regret among smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey. Nicotine Tob Res 2004; 6 Suppl 3:S341–51.

For the PDF of this article,
contact nzmj@nzma.org.nz

View Article PDF

Mike Daube’s editorial1 challenges us all to see the Smokefree 2025 goal realised. Reducing smoking prevalence to fall below five percent among all population groups is undoubtedly bold, but needs to be if we are to overcome the smoking epidemic. Currently, smoking is estimated to cause around 5,000 deaths2 each year, and around 550,000 New Zealanders remain addicted to nicotine.3 We need the audacity to plan a future in which the tobacco industry and its lethal products no longer have a pernicious hold on our population’s health.

We agree with Daube’s observation that progress since the goal was adopted in 2011 has been slow. This is despite the legacy of the Māori Affairs Select Committee, whose members first recommended setting a Smokefree 2025 goal.4 The previous Government introduced some important policies, such as getting rid of point-of-sale tobacco displays, but focused mainly on increasing individual cessation help, with quit attempts largely stimulated by higher taxation. There has been no overall plan, insufficient new population level policies and inadequate resources allocated to tobacco control.

With a new Government, we now have an opportunity to introduce a coordinated, evidence-based strategy. Already there are some signs of progress. The Minister of Health quickly recognised that a clear path was required to achieve the 2025 goal,5 and now Associate Minister Salesa has committed to creating a plan.6

The multi-level strategy Achieving Smokefree Aotearoa by 2025 (ASAP), launched last August, provides a clear roadmap for achieving the goal.7 ASAP 2025 drew on expertise from throughout the smokefree sector to create a plan that would reduce the incidence of smoking and create the first smokefree generation. Benefiting from wide consultation, particularly within the Māori and Pacific tobacco control sector, ASAP 2025 offers policymakers evidence-based options to accelerate progress.

To realise this progress, we need that extra push that can only be provided by Government itself. In the same way that the Australian government won accolades for their stance on introducing standardised packages,8 the New Zealand Government needs to demonstrate that sovereign rights to health should always take priority over the tobacco industry. Adopting the principles of the ASAP plan and resourcing the work would build on the work done throughout the tobacco control sector.

Now is the time for the Government to start breaking new ground. To date, addressing the issue of tobacco has largely focused on reducing demand for the product. We must intensify these efforts, but also address the availability of tobacco and start to regulate the product itself, so it is less appealing and less addictive.9–11 US Federal Drugs Administration has recently announced its intention to introduce policy measures in these areas.12

Rather than sell a lethal product through thousands of outlets, we should limit distribution and sell tobacco from outlets with secure storage and trained adult staff.13,14 Selling tobacco only from outlets open only to those over 18 would remove the product from its current everyday place in the retail environment.

Using community wisdom to inform the delivery of cessation services to high prevalence communities, and increasing funding for these services by drawing on tobacco excise tax, could enhance their reach and effectiveness, as well as reduce criticism directed at higher tobacco taxation as an effective measure, including the disproportionate effects on lower income groups.15 Greatly increased use of mass and social media to encourage quitting and discourage uptake should also be implemented.

The editorial gives pause for thought. Should we give up on the 2025 goal? Emphatically no! Doing so would betray the vast majority of smokers who want to quit.16–20 More particularly, abandoning the goal would be to betray Māori, who have suffered disproportionately from the impacts of tobacco. Abandoning the goal would also betray the vision of the Māori Affairs Select Committee, whose members conceived the 2025 goal.

So, we need the Government to step up quickly with action. Please Minister Salesa, we are waiting and there is no time to lose.

Summary

Abstract

Aim

Method

Results

Conclusion

Author Information

Martin Witt, Cancer Society of New Zealand, Canterbury West Coast;-Richard Edwards, Co-Director ASPIRE 2025, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington; Janet Hoek, Co-Director ASPIRE 2025, Department of Marketing, University of Otago, Dunedin; George Thomson, Assoc. Professor [Research] Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington.

Acknowledgements

Correspondence

Martin Witt, c/o Cancer Society Centre, PO Box 13-450, Christchurch 8141.

Correspondence Email

martin.witt@cancercwc.org.nz

Competing Interests

Nil.

  1. Daube M. Tobacco targets doomed to fail? N Z Med J 2018; 131(1473):25–41.
  2. Ministry of Health. (2004). Looking upstream: Causes of death cross-classified by risk and condition, New Zealand 1997.Wellington: Ministry of Health.
    http://minhealthnz.shinyapps.io/nz-health-survey-2016-17-tier-1/
  3. Ministry of Health. Tier 1 statistics 2016/17: New Zealand Health Survey. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Health, 2017. Accessed April 12, 2018.
  4. New Zealand Parliament. Inquiry into the tobacco industry in Aotearoa and the consequences of tobacco use for Māori. Report of the Māori Affairs Select Committee. Wellington: New Zealand Parliament; 2010.
  5. One News. Bold ideas needed for NZ to be smokefree by 2025. Auckland: Television New Zealand, October 30, 2017. Accessed April 26, 2018. http://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/watch-bold-ideas-needed-nz-smokefree-2025
  6. Thomas R. No room for complacency if we are to kick smoking by 2025, Helen Clark says. Stuff. March 27, 2018. http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/102608415/no-room-for-complacency-if-were-to-reach-kick-smoking-by-2025-helen-clark-says
  7. Thornley L, Edwards R, Waa A, et al. Achieving Smokefree Aotearoa by 2025. Wellington: University of Otago, Quitline Group Trust, Hāpai te Hauora, 2017. http://aspire2025.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/asap-main-report-for-web2.pdf
  8. Australian Commonwealth Government. Tobacco Plain Packaging Act [2016], Canberra, Australian Parliament Accessed April 18, 2018 http://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2016C00892
  9. Donny EC, Walker N, Hatsukami D, et al. Reducing the nicotine content of combusted tobacco products sold in New Zealand. Tob Control 2017; 26(e1):e37–e42. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053186
  10. Smith TT, Hatsukami DK, Benowitz NL, et al. Whether to push or pull? Nicotine reduction and non-combusted alternatives - Two strategies for reducing smoking and improving public health. Prev Med 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.03.021
  11. Hatsukami DK, Luo X, Dick L, et al. Reduced nicotine content cigarettes and use of alternative nicotine products: exploratory trial. Addiction 2017; 112(1):156–67. doi: 10.1111/add.13603
  12. US Food and Drug Administration (2018). “Tobacco Product Standard for Nicotine Level of Combusted Cigarettes: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking “ Federal Register 83 (52):11818–11843
  13. Robertson L, Marsh L, Edwards R, et al. Regulating tobacco retail in New Zealand: what can we learn from overseas? N Z Med J 2016; 129(1432):74–9.
  14. Roberson L, Gendall P, Hoek J, et al. Smokers’ Perceptions of the Relative Effectiveness of Five Tobacco Retail Reduction Policies. Nicotine Tob Res 2017; 19(2):245–52. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw193
  15. Hoek J, Smith K. A qualitative analysis of low income smokers’ responses to tobacco excise tax increases. Int J Drug Policy 2016; 37:82–8.
  16. Pechacek TF, Nayak P, Slovic P, et al. Reassessing the importance of ‘lost pleasure’ associated with smoking cessation: implications for social welfare and policy. Tob Control 2017 doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053734
  17. Wilson N, Edwards R, Weerasekera D. High levels of smoker regret by ethnicity and socioeconomic status: national survey data. N Z Med J 2009; 122(1292):99–100.
  18. Nayak P, Pechacek TF, Slovic P, et al. Regretting Ever Starting to Smoke: Results from a 2014 National Survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14(4) doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040390
  19. Sansone N, Fong GT, Lee WB, et al. Comparing the experience of regret and its predictors among smokers in four Asian countries: findings from the ITC surveys in Thailand, South Korea, Malaysia, and China. Nicotine Tob Res 2013; 15(10):1663–72. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt032
  20. Fong GT, Hammond D, Laux FL, et al. The near-universal experience of regret among smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey. Nicotine Tob Res 2004; 6 Suppl 3:S341–51.

Contact diana@nzma.org.nz
for the PDF of this article

Subscriber Content

The full contents of this pages only available to subscribers.
Login, subscribe or email nzmj@nzma.org.nz to purchase this article.

LOGINSUBSCRIBE
No items found.