Ford et al recently discussed the ongoing and problematic nature of alcohol misuse in New Zealand.1 Like many other Western countries, New Zealand liberalised its sale and supply of liquor legislation towards the end of the 20th Century, starting with the 1989 Sale of Liquor Act.2–3 Over time this legislation and subsequent amendments permitted a significant expansion in the number and types of premises permitted to sell alcohol, a reduction in the age to legally purchase alcohol from 20 to 18, and allowed Sunday trading in alcohol.2–3 The outcome of this deregulation has included an increase of more than 100% in the number of alcohol outlets in New Zealand, increasing from 6,000 to 14,000 over a decade, and a growing state of widespread unease concerning the negative impact of alcohol on society in New Zealand.4
The adverse global impact of alcohol is significant,5 and New Zealand is no exception.4,6,7 It must be remembered that any routine assessments of the impact of alcohol on morbidity and mortality may overlook the role of alcohol as a facilitator and risk factor for both domestic violence and suicide. The inequitable negative impact of alcohol-related morbidity and mortality among Māori is also a particular issue of concern.8-10
Ireland has an equally problematic relationship with alcohol,11–17 and has traditionally been subject to a host of negative stereotypes and caricatures internationally around this issue.17–19 Per capita alcohol consumption in Ireland is a significant issue of concern.20–22 However, such population-based averages lead to a gross underestimation of the extent of the problem in Ireland as just over one in five (20.6%) Irish adults are, for religious or other reasons, teetotal. Amended per capita calculations of alcohol consumption therefore indicate that in 2015, adults that consumed alcohol in Ireland drank on average the equivalent of 46 bottles of gin/vodka. Heavy episodic (‘binge’) drinking is a particular concern in Ireland. World Health Organization (WHO) research indicates that on this measure Ireland was second only to Austria out of 194 countries and significantly ahead of the UK.21
Similar to New Zealand, Ireland significantly deregulated its controls around alcohol in the early years of the 21st Century. Despite the growing and indisputable evidence11–16 of the negative and costly impact of alcohol on Irish society, successive governments have demonstrated remarkable ambivalence towards effective regulation of alcohol.23–24 However, the beginning of a turning point towards a more responsible approach to alcohol may be seen with the explicit inclusion of alcohol in Ireland’s Drug strategy in 2009.25
More recently, after more than 1,000 days of debate and in the face of significant opposition from representatives from rural constituencies, Ireland’s parliament (the Dáil) has just passed a new alcohol Bill which paved the way for a range of more stringent control measures.26–27 These include minimum unit pricing, mandatory cancer warnings and the spatial segregation of alcohol sales in shops.26
Given both the negative impact on morbidity and mortality attributable to alcohol and the high level of public unease about this issue, it may be an opportune time for New Zealand to once again seriously reconsider similar initiatives. New Zealand’s Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 enacted some, but not all of the impressively comprehensive Law Commission report Alcohol in Our Lives: Curbing the Harm.4 Thus former opportunities for more stringent protections may have been wasted, however now is the time for action.27 Recent research in New Zealand has highlighted the failure of a voluntary code of warnings on alcohol.28 Additionally, despite a reluctance in government circles,29 there appears to be growing pressure to push for legislation to introduce a minimum unit price initiative.30 Support for such a measure may also be seen in a recent Ministry of Justice report.31 In relation to the segregation of alcohol sales, it should be noted that the New Zealand Medical Association (NZMA) has already called for a ban on the sale of alcohol from supermarkets.32 In addition, research from New Zealand has amply demonstrated the high level of exposure of children to alcohol in everyday environments that only serves to normalise alcohol,33 a product that is ‘no ordinary commodity’.34
Ford et al recently discussed the ongoing and problematic nature of alcohol misuse in New Zealand.1 Like many other Western countries, New Zealand liberalised its sale and supply of liquor legislation towards the end of the 20th Century, starting with the 1989 Sale of Liquor Act.2–3 Over time this legislation and subsequent amendments permitted a significant expansion in the number and types of premises permitted to sell alcohol, a reduction in the age to legally purchase alcohol from 20 to 18, and allowed Sunday trading in alcohol.2–3 The outcome of this deregulation has included an increase of more than 100% in the number of alcohol outlets in New Zealand, increasing from 6,000 to 14,000 over a decade, and a growing state of widespread unease concerning the negative impact of alcohol on society in New Zealand.4
The adverse global impact of alcohol is significant,5 and New Zealand is no exception.4,6,7 It must be remembered that any routine assessments of the impact of alcohol on morbidity and mortality may overlook the role of alcohol as a facilitator and risk factor for both domestic violence and suicide. The inequitable negative impact of alcohol-related morbidity and mortality among Māori is also a particular issue of concern.8-10
Ireland has an equally problematic relationship with alcohol,11–17 and has traditionally been subject to a host of negative stereotypes and caricatures internationally around this issue.17–19 Per capita alcohol consumption in Ireland is a significant issue of concern.20–22 However, such population-based averages lead to a gross underestimation of the extent of the problem in Ireland as just over one in five (20.6%) Irish adults are, for religious or other reasons, teetotal. Amended per capita calculations of alcohol consumption therefore indicate that in 2015, adults that consumed alcohol in Ireland drank on average the equivalent of 46 bottles of gin/vodka. Heavy episodic (‘binge’) drinking is a particular concern in Ireland. World Health Organization (WHO) research indicates that on this measure Ireland was second only to Austria out of 194 countries and significantly ahead of the UK.21
Similar to New Zealand, Ireland significantly deregulated its controls around alcohol in the early years of the 21st Century. Despite the growing and indisputable evidence11–16 of the negative and costly impact of alcohol on Irish society, successive governments have demonstrated remarkable ambivalence towards effective regulation of alcohol.23–24 However, the beginning of a turning point towards a more responsible approach to alcohol may be seen with the explicit inclusion of alcohol in Ireland’s Drug strategy in 2009.25
More recently, after more than 1,000 days of debate and in the face of significant opposition from representatives from rural constituencies, Ireland’s parliament (the Dáil) has just passed a new alcohol Bill which paved the way for a range of more stringent control measures.26–27 These include minimum unit pricing, mandatory cancer warnings and the spatial segregation of alcohol sales in shops.26
Given both the negative impact on morbidity and mortality attributable to alcohol and the high level of public unease about this issue, it may be an opportune time for New Zealand to once again seriously reconsider similar initiatives. New Zealand’s Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 enacted some, but not all of the impressively comprehensive Law Commission report Alcohol in Our Lives: Curbing the Harm.4 Thus former opportunities for more stringent protections may have been wasted, however now is the time for action.27 Recent research in New Zealand has highlighted the failure of a voluntary code of warnings on alcohol.28 Additionally, despite a reluctance in government circles,29 there appears to be growing pressure to push for legislation to introduce a minimum unit price initiative.30 Support for such a measure may also be seen in a recent Ministry of Justice report.31 In relation to the segregation of alcohol sales, it should be noted that the New Zealand Medical Association (NZMA) has already called for a ban on the sale of alcohol from supermarkets.32 In addition, research from New Zealand has amply demonstrated the high level of exposure of children to alcohol in everyday environments that only serves to normalise alcohol,33 a product that is ‘no ordinary commodity’.34
Ford et al recently discussed the ongoing and problematic nature of alcohol misuse in New Zealand.1 Like many other Western countries, New Zealand liberalised its sale and supply of liquor legislation towards the end of the 20th Century, starting with the 1989 Sale of Liquor Act.2–3 Over time this legislation and subsequent amendments permitted a significant expansion in the number and types of premises permitted to sell alcohol, a reduction in the age to legally purchase alcohol from 20 to 18, and allowed Sunday trading in alcohol.2–3 The outcome of this deregulation has included an increase of more than 100% in the number of alcohol outlets in New Zealand, increasing from 6,000 to 14,000 over a decade, and a growing state of widespread unease concerning the negative impact of alcohol on society in New Zealand.4
The adverse global impact of alcohol is significant,5 and New Zealand is no exception.4,6,7 It must be remembered that any routine assessments of the impact of alcohol on morbidity and mortality may overlook the role of alcohol as a facilitator and risk factor for both domestic violence and suicide. The inequitable negative impact of alcohol-related morbidity and mortality among Māori is also a particular issue of concern.8-10
Ireland has an equally problematic relationship with alcohol,11–17 and has traditionally been subject to a host of negative stereotypes and caricatures internationally around this issue.17–19 Per capita alcohol consumption in Ireland is a significant issue of concern.20–22 However, such population-based averages lead to a gross underestimation of the extent of the problem in Ireland as just over one in five (20.6%) Irish adults are, for religious or other reasons, teetotal. Amended per capita calculations of alcohol consumption therefore indicate that in 2015, adults that consumed alcohol in Ireland drank on average the equivalent of 46 bottles of gin/vodka. Heavy episodic (‘binge’) drinking is a particular concern in Ireland. World Health Organization (WHO) research indicates that on this measure Ireland was second only to Austria out of 194 countries and significantly ahead of the UK.21
Similar to New Zealand, Ireland significantly deregulated its controls around alcohol in the early years of the 21st Century. Despite the growing and indisputable evidence11–16 of the negative and costly impact of alcohol on Irish society, successive governments have demonstrated remarkable ambivalence towards effective regulation of alcohol.23–24 However, the beginning of a turning point towards a more responsible approach to alcohol may be seen with the explicit inclusion of alcohol in Ireland’s Drug strategy in 2009.25
More recently, after more than 1,000 days of debate and in the face of significant opposition from representatives from rural constituencies, Ireland’s parliament (the Dáil) has just passed a new alcohol Bill which paved the way for a range of more stringent control measures.26–27 These include minimum unit pricing, mandatory cancer warnings and the spatial segregation of alcohol sales in shops.26
Given both the negative impact on morbidity and mortality attributable to alcohol and the high level of public unease about this issue, it may be an opportune time for New Zealand to once again seriously reconsider similar initiatives. New Zealand’s Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 enacted some, but not all of the impressively comprehensive Law Commission report Alcohol in Our Lives: Curbing the Harm.4 Thus former opportunities for more stringent protections may have been wasted, however now is the time for action.27 Recent research in New Zealand has highlighted the failure of a voluntary code of warnings on alcohol.28 Additionally, despite a reluctance in government circles,29 there appears to be growing pressure to push for legislation to introduce a minimum unit price initiative.30 Support for such a measure may also be seen in a recent Ministry of Justice report.31 In relation to the segregation of alcohol sales, it should be noted that the New Zealand Medical Association (NZMA) has already called for a ban on the sale of alcohol from supermarkets.32 In addition, research from New Zealand has amply demonstrated the high level of exposure of children to alcohol in everyday environments that only serves to normalise alcohol,33 a product that is ‘no ordinary commodity’.34
Ford et al recently discussed the ongoing and problematic nature of alcohol misuse in New Zealand.1 Like many other Western countries, New Zealand liberalised its sale and supply of liquor legislation towards the end of the 20th Century, starting with the 1989 Sale of Liquor Act.2–3 Over time this legislation and subsequent amendments permitted a significant expansion in the number and types of premises permitted to sell alcohol, a reduction in the age to legally purchase alcohol from 20 to 18, and allowed Sunday trading in alcohol.2–3 The outcome of this deregulation has included an increase of more than 100% in the number of alcohol outlets in New Zealand, increasing from 6,000 to 14,000 over a decade, and a growing state of widespread unease concerning the negative impact of alcohol on society in New Zealand.4
The adverse global impact of alcohol is significant,5 and New Zealand is no exception.4,6,7 It must be remembered that any routine assessments of the impact of alcohol on morbidity and mortality may overlook the role of alcohol as a facilitator and risk factor for both domestic violence and suicide. The inequitable negative impact of alcohol-related morbidity and mortality among Māori is also a particular issue of concern.8-10
Ireland has an equally problematic relationship with alcohol,11–17 and has traditionally been subject to a host of negative stereotypes and caricatures internationally around this issue.17–19 Per capita alcohol consumption in Ireland is a significant issue of concern.20–22 However, such population-based averages lead to a gross underestimation of the extent of the problem in Ireland as just over one in five (20.6%) Irish adults are, for religious or other reasons, teetotal. Amended per capita calculations of alcohol consumption therefore indicate that in 2015, adults that consumed alcohol in Ireland drank on average the equivalent of 46 bottles of gin/vodka. Heavy episodic (‘binge’) drinking is a particular concern in Ireland. World Health Organization (WHO) research indicates that on this measure Ireland was second only to Austria out of 194 countries and significantly ahead of the UK.21
Similar to New Zealand, Ireland significantly deregulated its controls around alcohol in the early years of the 21st Century. Despite the growing and indisputable evidence11–16 of the negative and costly impact of alcohol on Irish society, successive governments have demonstrated remarkable ambivalence towards effective regulation of alcohol.23–24 However, the beginning of a turning point towards a more responsible approach to alcohol may be seen with the explicit inclusion of alcohol in Ireland’s Drug strategy in 2009.25
More recently, after more than 1,000 days of debate and in the face of significant opposition from representatives from rural constituencies, Ireland’s parliament (the Dáil) has just passed a new alcohol Bill which paved the way for a range of more stringent control measures.26–27 These include minimum unit pricing, mandatory cancer warnings and the spatial segregation of alcohol sales in shops.26
Given both the negative impact on morbidity and mortality attributable to alcohol and the high level of public unease about this issue, it may be an opportune time for New Zealand to once again seriously reconsider similar initiatives. New Zealand’s Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 enacted some, but not all of the impressively comprehensive Law Commission report Alcohol in Our Lives: Curbing the Harm.4 Thus former opportunities for more stringent protections may have been wasted, however now is the time for action.27 Recent research in New Zealand has highlighted the failure of a voluntary code of warnings on alcohol.28 Additionally, despite a reluctance in government circles,29 there appears to be growing pressure to push for legislation to introduce a minimum unit price initiative.30 Support for such a measure may also be seen in a recent Ministry of Justice report.31 In relation to the segregation of alcohol sales, it should be noted that the New Zealand Medical Association (NZMA) has already called for a ban on the sale of alcohol from supermarkets.32 In addition, research from New Zealand has amply demonstrated the high level of exposure of children to alcohol in everyday environments that only serves to normalise alcohol,33 a product that is ‘no ordinary commodity’.34
The full contents of this pages only available to subscribers.
Login, subscribe or email nzmj@nzma.org.nz to purchase this article.